Summit of Americas... but only for certain members of America

#51
#51
Septic said:
This whole thread is a giant who gives a sh*t.

Ohnoe, the Guatemalan president is butthurt because the third world dictators weren't invited.
Click to expand...
No leader in Latin America outside of the 3 countries mentioned would have been this vocal and stood up to the US in this fashion just 5 years ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf
#55
#55
Rasputin_Vol said:
No leader in Latin America outside of the 3 countries mentioned would have been this vocal and stood up to the US in this fashion just 5 years ago.
Click to expand...

Assuming you're speculation is correct, although I'm not granting it. So what? Are we worried about how lippy a few third world dictators are getting?
 
#56
#56
Septic said:
I mean who wouldn't be boiling over with rage that Cuba, Venezuela and Guatemala declined invitations to the party?

@Rasputin_Vol is looking to distract from the current administrations successful salvage and galvanization of its alliances with our NATO and EU partners. "Pay no attention to NATO growing, look Guatemala isn't going to come to a conference."
Click to expand...

Surely you can't be serious. This White House has nothing to do with Finland and Sweden being nervous about Russia expansionism during the Biden administration. If anything, an idiot in the White House is a threat to the world.
 
#57
#57
tvolsfan said:
Yes, always. Isolationism should now be considered backwards.
Click to expand...

one's international reputation is not the same concept as isolationism. when we were fighting multiple wars in the ME to "help" we weren't exactly loved around the world.
 
#58
#58
BreatheUT said:
Surely you can't be serious. This White House has nothing to do with Finland and Sweden being nervous about Russia expansionism during the Biden administration. If anything, an idiot in the White House is a threat to the world.
Click to expand...

Who said anything about Finland and Sweden?

I think it's disingenuous to even suggest that the U.S.'s response to the supporting NATO countries through backfilling of arms as well as directly to Ukraine is not a signal that the U.S. is all in for NATO. Look - Trump was right when he questioned the sanity of NATO members who were spending money buying oil from the very country they spent billions on protecting themselves from. The current administration has signaled that we're to be counted on. And that's in stark contrast from the previous administration position and mixed messages that we may not be available if Russia attacked, or that our support was conditional.

It's cool though, I wouldn't expect the Trumpers to give an inch on not shi**ting on Biden's administration under any circumstance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#59
#59
Septic said:
Who said anything about Finland and Sweden?

I think it's disingenuous to even suggest that the U.S.'s response to the supporting NATO countries through backfilling of arms as well as directly to Ukraine is not a signal that the U.S. is all in for NATO. Look - Trump was right when he questioned the sanity of NATO members who were spending money buying oil from the very country they spent billions on protecting themselves from. The current administration has signaled that we're to be counted on. And that's in stark contrast from the previous administration position and mixed messages that we may not be available if Russia attacked, or that our support was conditional.

It's cool though, I wouldn't expect the Trumpers to give an inch on not shi**ting on Biden's administration under any circumstance.
Click to expand...


Well, the Democrats/Progressives welcomed Trump with open arms. Don't you remember?
 
#62
#62
Don't expect Biden to be interested in improving the quality of life in any areas that contribute to these caravans of illegals.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top