Tankers Attacked In Gulf: Price of Oil Up

Wasnt medicare Reagan? What about Iraq? Did you attempt to look clever by only posting part of my post ..when I clearly asked in this millennium what repubs have done?? You know...the last 20 years? There are kids at UT that weren't even BORN when any of the things you mentioned were passed by repubs...

Nice try tho...hahahahaha
 
Wasnt medicare Reagan? What about Iraq? Did you attempt to look clever by only posting part of my post ..when I clearly asked in this millennium what repubs have done?? You know...the last 20 years? There are kids at UT that weren't even BORN when any of the things you mentioned were passed by repubs...

Nice try tho...hahahahaha
Both Medicare part D and the invasion of Iraq were in 2003. Not sure how many 15yo are at UT but I have to believe it's not many.
 
Nah..except that I was also specifically talking to LG...are you a female gator fan pretending to be a lawyer? Or just a mod looking for an argument as usual? Just checking...
 
Nah..except that I was also specifically talking to LG...are you a female gator fan pretending to be a lawyer? Or just a mod looking for an argument as usual? Just checking...
Well I wasnt the one hurling insults and making claims that are easily proven false. The GOP doesn't care about debt like you attempted to claim. I don't care who your post was directed to
 
You know corporate welfare doesn't count. Can't include that.

We have taken our “cooperate welfare” and ordered 3 new trucks (300k plus each), purchased 2 new mini excavators, new skid steer, dump truck and equipment trailer along with adding 6 new positions.

Give me more “welfare” and I’ll put more people to work.
 
We have taken our “cooperate welfare” and ordered 3 new trucks (300k plus each), purchased 2 new mini excavators, new skid steer, dump truck and equipment trailer along with adding 6 new positions.

Give me more “welfare” and I’ll put more people to work.
I never said it didn't benefit everyone. The question is how much it benefited the super wealthy. And at what cost.
 
Not much navy left for England..so you can count on more US ships headed there now in addition to the carrier flotilla that's already nearby. Open season will soon be declared in these puny Iranian fastboats . They are morons seemingly intent on starting a real shooting war. If any of those UK ships crew are harmed or not immediately released the UK will likely begin airstrikes. Patience has to be nearly gone by now. Hopefully cooler heads prevail...
Wait... The UK started this by hijacking an Iranian oil tanker in the Straits of Gibraltar. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, we are allowing the UK to cry victim?

LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pacer92
Wait... The UK started this by hijacking an Iranian oil tanker in the Straits of Gibraltar. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, we are allowing the UK to cry victim?

LOL
The UK claimed enforcement of sanction violations. If they prove that it’s a valid detention. Iran has claimed some ambiguous international maritime law violation. If they prove it fine. If they don’t they are the ones actually hijacking a vessel not the UK.
 
The UK claimed enforcement of sanction violations. If they prove that it’s a valid detention. Iran has claimed some ambiguous international maritime law violation. If they prove it fine. If they don’t they are the ones actually hijacking a vessel not the UK.
Sanctions? You really don't understand, do you? Who is the UK or America or anybody to tell a sovereign nation who they can and cannot trade with? If the UK or America doesn't want to purchase Iranian products, that is their right to decide that. But they have ZERO right to hijack a commercial vessel in international waters. Iran still has a right to free trade. Anything that hinders that free trade (especially the hijacking of a commercial tanker) can be seen as an act of war. And you damn well know that I'm right.
 
Sanctions? You really don't understand, do you? Who is the UK or America or anybody to tell a sovereign nation who they can and cannot trade with? If the UK or America doesn't want to purchase Iranian products, that is their right to decide that. But they have ZERO right to hijack a commercial vessel in international waters. Iran still has a right to free trade. Anything that hinders that free trade (especially the hijacking of a commercial tanker) can be seen as an act of war. And you damn well know that I'm right.
I understand perfectly. Also if you’re right then an appeal to the international maritime court should easily prevail no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreyWolf1129
Sanctions? You really don't understand, do you? Who is the UK or America or anybody to tell a sovereign nation who they can and cannot trade with? If the UK or America doesn't want to purchase Iranian products, that is their right to decide that. But they have ZERO right to hijack a commercial vessel in international waters. Iran still has a right to free trade. Anything that hinders that free trade (especially the hijacking of a commercial tanker) can be seen as an act of war. And you damn well know that I'm right.

Good Lord, Ras. If Iran nuked Israel, your argument would be "Who is the UK or America to tell Iran that they cannot provide high-intensity nuclear energy to any other nation?"
 
Good Lord, Ras. If Iran nuked Israel, your argument would be "Who is the UK or America to tell Iran that they cannot provide high-intensity nuclear energy to any other nation?"
Good Lord, Wolf. You actually compared a retaliatory strike against the UK to an unprovoked attack on Israel...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pacer92

VN Store



Back
Top