And both a little more indicative of the actual quality of the defense as well. Certainly they can improve, but I think they've been pretty solid all things considered. They've forced a good amount of turnovers, they've made plays when they've needed to make plays. That's all you can ask for with an offense that's as good as ours. Once they kind of turn a corner and improve, we'll be perennial title contenders.That’s a fair point. Either one is better than looking at yards.
That's total defense.
our rush defense is like 14th or something like that.
our pass defense is bad. don't look it up.
Scoring defense - points allowed is 43rd.
Have you watched him play in other games? It could be UT's coverage schemes or techniques. However he threw balls into tight windows in the UT game that he hasn't been able to repeat in in any other game. He was literally more accurate in that game. Again, I'm sure that's a function of what UT did on D. But UT was not his lightest competition.No, but TN has made teams LOOK LIKE good passing teams. We made Anthony Richardson look like a Heisman contender.
everyone on espn keeps going on and on about derek mason and ok st's defense though....101 Memphis 7 515 2937 5.70 26 28 419.6
102 ULM 7 470 2949 6.27 28 34 421.3
103 Michigan St. 7 499 2956 5.92 24 24 422.3
104 Tennessee 6 466 2552 5.48 16 17 425.3
105 Middle Tenn. 7 526 2985 5.67 28 30 426.4
106 Florida 7 504 3005 5.96 23 24 429.3
107 UTSA 7 514 3008 5.85 23 25 429.7
108 Indiana 7 544 3013 5.54 26 28 430.4
109 SMU 6 455 2592 5.70 22 22 432.0
110 Oklahoma St. 6 478 2624 5.49 21 21 437.3
But it doesn’t seem like it does it? Is this true?![]()
Stats are pretty misleading sometimes.101 Memphis 7 515 2937 5.70 26 28 419.6
102 ULM 7 470 2949 6.27 28 34 421.3
103 Michigan St. 7 499 2956 5.92 24 24 422.3
104 Tennessee 6 466 2552 5.48 16 17 425.3
105 Middle Tenn. 7 526 2985 5.67 28 30 426.4
106 Florida 7 504 3005 5.96 23 24 429.3
107 UTSA 7 514 3008 5.85 23 25 429.7
108 Indiana 7 544 3013 5.54 26 28 430.4
109 SMU 6 455 2592 5.70 22 22 432.0
110 Oklahoma St. 6 478 2624 5.49 21 21 437.3
But it doesn’t seem like it does it? Is this true?![]()
That is the key stat of college football today. Net points per drive. a.k.a., net points per possession.
CJH said early on "We will never win the time of possession." We know his game plan is predicated on an aggressive, fast moving offense. Our run defense is one of the top in the nation. This puts the pressure on our opponents to play offense outside of their comfort zone in order to stay in the track meet. Our pass D is meant to be very aggressive too, with an emphasis placed on turnovers. Bend, don't break. The more time opposing offenses have the ball, the more time they have to make mistakes. His system works the math and probability of maximization. Once our pass D catches up, it will truly be game over. Ohio State could match up well with us if they are playing their A game. This year is very exciting. Can you imagine what will happen when CJH gets his personnel in Knoxville?
Seriously? Did you watch the UT Florida game?Have you watched him play in other games? It could be UT's coverage schemes or techniques. However he threw balls into tight windows in the UT game that he hasn't been able to repeat in in any other game. He was literally more accurate in that game. Again, I'm sure that's a function of what UT did on D. But UT was not his lightest competition.
You can probably convince me that the defensive gameplan and playcalling weren't good.