Tennessee/Indiana to Play Public Charity Exhibition in TBA

Just comparing yesterday's lineups and performance to what has transpired over the last month or two, I'd encourage everyone to assume something close to nothing. Indiana played a tight rotation (missing some guys too) and played to win. We played a hodgepodge of lineups to see how things fit, and still played IU tight to the buzzer.
This context always helps and is always appreciated.

Its becoming more evident (to me at least) that this exhibition was not really one that we were really looking to win. I think if that were the case, we wouldn't have seen all of the lineups that we saw out on the floor... especially against a ranked Indiana team.

We typically don't see CRB & staff play as many players as he did in a non-conference game against any ranked opponent.

ZZ would've played PG the whole game.
Boswell wouldn't have been on the floor only up 4 pts with ~ 8 mins remaining in the 2nd half and highly doubt Lanier will be on the bench to close out these type of games as well.

It was definitely a tough watch especially without the context but I think this will help the team 10x more than a win with a limited rotation.
 
I didn't watch the game yesterday because I was at friend's house watching the Bears- Commanders game. He is from Chicago so I was afraid to ask to change the channel.

Sounds almost like Barnes just put them out there and let them play. It was a freaking exhibition anyway. Will take time for the team to gel
 
I didn't watch the game yesterday because I was at friend's house watching the Bears- Commanders game. He is from Chicago so I was afraid to ask to change the channel.

Sounds almost like Barnes just put them out there and let them play. It was a freaking exhibition anyway. Will take time for the team to gel
I think that’s exactly what we saw Barnes do yesterday and was exactly what he wanted to accomplish. The team is still finding its identity and Barnes is putting in different looks to see what he has.

I watched it last night and we certainly didn’t look great, but if you noticed the rotations (which were fairly random), I’m certain it wasn’t designed to put the balls to the wall and win. Think it was more “let’s try this and see what we get” and more “here’s the plan, let’s see if this group can execute” approach - which is exactly what these exhibitions are made for, particularly against a good opponent like Indiana.

Think we’ve got some really good pieces in place and I’m excited to see this team come together. Defensively, I think we will be better than last year, offensively probably a step back. You can’t just replace Knecht and Santi/James in an instant. These guys have to play together and get some experience before we start seeing what they can do.
 
My biggest concern coming out of this game is that we only have 1 point guard on the entire roster. ZZ having to play 37 min in an exhibition game tells me there is no one else can run point effectively.
It’s a bit of a concern for sure. Barnes will probably have to build some guys up in that role under the fire of the season. But to think anyone is going to be able to run PG like ZZ is where I’ll struggle trying to accept, he’s just that good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FeelVol
It’s a bit of a concern for sure. Barnes will probably have to build some guys up in that role under the fire of the season. But to think anyone is going to be able to run PG like ZZ is where I’ll struggle trying to accept, he’s just that good.

When ZZ is out the strategy will be to burn minutes and not give up more points than can be scored. Gaines, Mashack, Boswell, or whoever won’t replicate ZZ. They’ll have to adjust with a modified style of play.
 
My biggest concern coming out of this game is that we only have 1 point guard on the entire roster. ZZ having to play 37 min in an exhibition game tells me there is no one else can run point effectively.
I agree and an even bigger concern is next year. Do we go the high school route or get a true PG in the portal. Either way you are breaking in a PG new to the program and system.
 
I don’t see any difference from last years team if that says anything. We are good but not championship good, and anyone saying otherwise are lying to themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CAVPUT
I agree and an even bigger concern is next year. Do we go the high school route or get a true PG in the portal. Either way you are breaking in a PG new to the program and system.

I would think the expectation or goal is to bring Boswell along throughout an entire season of practice where he could fill ZZ’s shoes to some degree and then supplement with a portal PG.
 
For an exhibition game, saw both positive and negative which is too be expected. During the last few minutes of the game, only Zeigler seemed willing to take a shot and that in and of itself is a problem. As a facilitator he did create a nice look for Mashack which he buried from top of the key and at least he got the FT line often but he really shouldn't be our # 1 option at the end of the game and hope that gets fixed and we can run better halfcourt offense. Myles clearly outplayed him and thought ZZ was forcing too much throughout the game. His shooting % was poor and had 5 of our 15 turnovers. Barnes talks about players understanding their roles well and that includes Zeigler.

I like the fact that we really pushed tempo on offense, although we didn't create as many points off turnovers as we should. We are going to need to score easy buckets so hope they continue with tempo as our halfcourt offense may struggle unless we are hitting from the perimeter with regularity. Our defense overall was fine but our transition defense was not good. IU got 18 pts off fast breaks. I think we can be a very good rebounding team with the size and length we have on the court. Maybe offensive rebounding can get us some extra buckets. Low post scoring was almost non-existent except the times we went to Okpara. Very little driving to the basket either.

Individually: ZZ will be fine and is the heart and soul of the team. Gainey, if we can get 12 pts and only 1 TO from him every game, I would take that in a heartbeat. Mashack, played well and probably should look to generate more offense/shots than he did. Not really his nature but I think this team is going to need it. Lanier, wasn't shy that's for sure and we are going to need him to continue to be aggressive. Had some poor shot selection but for an exhibition that is forgivable. Bigger than I thought he would be. He isn't a 3-level scorer and obviously struggled today with FG % which may be attributed to higher level of competition, but it appeared he has modified his release a bit. Has a very quick shot. Need him to be consistent 15 ppg scorer so keep jacking them up when open. Carr didn't do much which was disappointing. Need something off the bench from him. Boswell won't really play this year unless we are blowing someone out, so wasn't expecting much.

In the frontcourt, Okapara is going to be better than I thought. He outplayed Ballo which was surprising. Very athletic dude and will control paint defensively. We need something from the frontcourt offensively and as of right now, he is our best option. Estrella will be capable backup in the post. Milicic is a good rebounder and is physical but wasn't looking for his shot at all. I thought we had a stretch 4 coming into the game but haven't seen it yet. If UT wants to compete for titles and do some damage in NCAA tournament, and if he wants to get a shot at next level, his mentality on offense has to change. We have to get more scoring from the frontcourt. Phillips has gotten bigger. Active and athletic who got 5 boards in 8 minutes (good) but also had 3 TOs (not good). He can give us some garbage points on put backs, running the court, etc...IMO. Hate to see it but Dubar is either a miss on the coaches' assessment OR the coaches are not using him correctly OR he just isn't buying into this role. Guy was a consistent scorer for 3 years at a very efficient rate, but he looked lost on offense and didn't play smart defensively (2 fouls in 5 minutes) and on his only shot attempt played too fast and the ball slipped out of his hands. He isn't going to create his own shot so they either need to run some action for him or I question why they even recruited him out of the portal. If you just want someone to defend and set screens, he isn't the guy. Kinda perplexing. No wonder Phillips is ahead of him in the rotation.

Overall, only an exhibition so take it what it's worth. They have some work to do on offense because they don't have "him" to bail them out anymore. Defensively we will be good, because that is UT's calling card.
Damn, did you read my mind? Lol.. I love this assessment and agree 100%… I also was indeed disappointed in Carr! I was expecting to see something different yet positive in his second year and although he didn’t play many minutes, he still didn’t look much different! And I 100% agree regarding Dubar! I hate to say it, but so far it’s giving “bust”…. (I hope I’m wrong)… I honestly think he may be an (EJ Anosike) transfer where the production does not translate on this level, but I really hope I’m wrong because I think he has the body to be a mismatch problem… Igor kind of disappointed me as well. In the sense of, I was and STILL is expecting him to be more offensive prowling than others… he should be on the block posting up and creating mismatch problems!! And lastly, yes im excited to see the growth of Okpara! I love that he did not foul out which shows maturity!! I feel his offense will improve, and his defense will be key this season! Oh and my favorite ZZ didn’t seem himself! But he’s one guy I will never worry about upping his level of play!
 
I'm glad this was just an exhibition. I'm curious how the team looks so I might try to catch some of the game tonight.
 

VN Store



Back
Top