VolBalls33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 2,076
- Likes
- 5,339
Lynx Sign Guard Odyssey Sims - Minnesota Lynx
"MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL – The Minnesota Lynx today announced the team has signed guard Odyssey Sims to a training camp contract. In subsequent moves, the Lynx have waived guards Layshia Clarendon, Crystal Dangerfield and Yvonne Turner along with forwards Rennia Davis and Kayla Jones and center Hannah Sjerven. Per team policy, terms of Sims’ deal were not released."
Wow. It is brutal out here.
There's a chance that Minny will swoop in and take at least one of those players off the waivers as a hardship exemption or something, but it will likely be one of the PGs.From Rookie of the Year to off the team just two years later... life comes at you fast.
What's your favorite memory from the Rennia Davis-Lynx era?
Because when I think of the WNBA I don't think of Griner. She is not the face of the league....A lot of folks on here are very negative towards BG and it seemed you wanted someone to say she broke a law instead of just saying it was a nightmare.
So now my question- why did you ask when you knew the answer?
No, my question was when someone mentioned a nightmare for BG you asked what that might be when you clearly knew what the issue was - breaking some countries laws. So why ask when you knew what had happened.Because when I think of the WNBA I don't think of Griner. She is not the face of the league....
The subject was support for the WNBA ...If you wish to carry the Griner banner that's on you. She is not the face of the league.No, my question was when someone mentioned a nightmare for BG you asked what that might be when you clearly knew what the issue was - breaking some countries laws. So why ask when you knew what had happened.
As an aside anyone who breaks Russian laws is okay with me.
The quote was "the ongoing Griner nightmare" lots of good going on with the league.Why bring her into the equation???No, my question was when someone mentioned a nightmare for BG you asked what that might be when you clearly knew what the issue was - breaking some countries laws. So why ask when you knew what had happened.
As an aside anyone who breaks Russian laws is okay with me.
Atlanta wasn't unique, teams were bought and sold in other cities and the same things happened in them. They were so worried about losing the NBA's financial support that they wouldn't step out on a limb and get aggressive in growth. All I could do was watch it happen. I offered to step in and help, but the aim was buy and sell, not buy and grow.
Seems that it still has that same mentality. Too scared of taking risks to grow.
A lot of folks on here are very negative towards BG and it seemed you wanted someone to say she broke a law instead of just saying it was a nightmare.
So now my question- why did you ask when you knew the answer?
Answering that you don’t consider BG the face of the WNBA or even a significant player does not explain why you did not accept someone calling her arrest a nightmare. You responded to that post by asking what did she do to get arrested? You asked this when you already knew it was a drug related arrest. This seems like an attempt to throw shade on BG.I have about four times ..you just don't like the answer.....what are you after???
Answering that you don’t consider BG the face of the WNBA or even a significant player does not explain why you did not accept someone calling her arrest a nightmare. You responded to that post by asking what did she do to get arrested? You asked this when you already knew it was a drug related arrest. This seems like an attempt to throw shade on BG.
After this lengthy back and forth I am wondering if your question was related to the use of the word nightmare not the arrest? As in why was this a nightmare versus why was there an arrest. We obviously are not on the same page here.
A law passed by Congress in 2020 established 11 criteria for such a designation, any one of which can be a sufficient basis to secure the detainee’s release, including “credible information indicating innocence of the detained individual,” “credible reports that the detention is a pretext for an illegitimate purpose,” or a conclusion that U.S. “diplomatic engagement is likely necessary.”
The WNBA announced
on May 3 that it will feature Griner's initials and jersey number (No. 42) on the sideline of all WNBA courts this season. The league also granted the Mercury roster and salary cap relief so they can carry a replacement player. Griner will continue to be paid her full salary.
"As we begin the 2022 season, we are keeping Brittney at the forefront of what we do through the game of basketball and in the community," WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert said in a statement. "We continue to work on bringing Brittney home and are appreciative of the support the community has shown BG and her family during this extraordinarily challenging time."
The top 5 most ambitious NIL collectives
Hopefully some of that 25 million will go to recruit and also some deals for present Lady Vols.
Please don't misquote me .. I asked what is the nightmare.......her arrest has little to do with the status of the WNBA......my quote was "apparently using drugs"...... Not saying she is innocent or guilty..thus the word apparently.......which in my opinion has nothing to do with the status of the league.Answering that you don’t consider BG the face of the WNBA or even a significant player does not explain why you did not accept someone calling her arrest a nightmare. You responded to that post by asking what did she do to get arrested? You asked this when you already knew it was a drug related arrest. This seems like an attempt to throw shade on BG.
After this lengthy back and forth I am wondering if your question was related to the use of the word nightmare not the arrest? As in why was this a nightmare versus why was there an arrest. We obviously are not on the same page here.
Your just a fountain of misinformation.... The subject at hand was the status of the League. I used the term apparently niether saying guilty or innocent....And the Griner "nightmare" has really nothing to do with the subject at hand..Just a couple of follow-up points on Memvol44's "different page"
The United States government has offficially classified Brittany Griner as "wrongfully detained."
U.S. now considers Griner 'wrongfully detained'
From the NYT, here are the conditions that lead to such a classification:
While Memvol44 is free to not consider Griner "the face of the WNBA," it is more consequential that WNBA does:
Last but not least, anyone who objects to the appellation "nightmare" being used in reference to someone who has been arrested and wrongfully detained by a country with an abhorrent human rights record and that is currently committing war crimes, well, they really need to re-assess their priorities.