VolBalls33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 2,057
- Likes
- 5,277
That’s probably the dumbest suggestion I’ve ever read! Absolutely impossible in terms of logistics.I think another step NCAA should take after doing a great job adding portal system is to schedule teams just like pros instead of allowing coaches to pick who they want to play. Scheduling schools is another way to make the game tougher. Some coaches dosen't like to play anyone then makes it harder and risky to injury for teams that don't mind playing anyone.
The conference schedule is already made by the NCAA and conference as are the tournament schedules at the end of the season. No one will ever do anything about the non conference schedule that will always be the choices of the coach and school. What the NCAA needs to do is grade the non conference schedules fairly and award teams that play the top schedules and penalize those that don't when it come to tournaments.Impossible but not dumb. All sports rules when ncaa started was some ppl that made them right and it was looked into be4 someone said yes lets do it.
Agreed. First of all, the conference eats up half the season. Second, the NCAA is like the Federal government - never give it more power than you have to. Third, a coach needs flexibility according to the team. A second year coaches needs ( Kim) are different than an entrenched (Dawn) coach. A money laden team like a Tennessee or SCar has different scheduling ability than a PAC team. Fourth, I could go on and on but I, kk just fall back on the second reasonThat’s probably the dumbest suggestion I’ve ever read! Absolutely impossible in terms of logistics.
The conference schedule is already made by the NCAA and conference as are the tournament schedules at the end of the season. No one will ever do anything about the non conference schedule that will always be the choices of the coach and school. What the NCAA needs to do is grade the non conference schedules fairly and award teams that play the top schedules and penalize those that don't when it come to tournaments.
Marta will most likely contribute and be better as she has matured. But she isn't going to be a Horston, a RJ, or a Key. If and a big if UT would just about go undefeated with 4 All SEC players.
I wouldn’t be shocked if she has as good a career as Horston and Key. Marta is a talented player. She was All-SEC freshman team for a reason. Lots of opposing coaches had things to say about her as a freshman and she wasn’t even totally healthy.
She can play inside out, handle, shoot the 3, defend and has a great transition game. She can also set the offense up and take someone 1-1 with success. She’s going to contribute in a major way as she progresses so long as she stays healthy.
In my opinion, the only reason Marta or Puckett isn’t starting is because the LVs landed the most explosive scorer in WCBB Rickea Jackson. Both are good enough to start for several ranked teams. Hollingshead as well is a starter caliber player coming off the bench.
The one and only area of Marta's game that isn't phenomenal is, to my eye anyway, that she isn't very quick. She gets the job done for the most part, but it remains to be seen how she'd fare if opposing coaches stick their quickest defender on her.
But OMG! I think she may be this season's Keyen Green as far as leadership is concerned. In the Carson-Newman game she was the one always directing teammates and talking to them on the floor. And when she shoots she KNOWS it's going in. You can see that in her body language. I could not be happier knowing we've got three full seasons of Marta Suarez to look forward to.
One thing that stands out in the tons of new video content we are getting about the players and program (shoutout to @Volfan2012 for sharing those videos) is how poised and articulate our girls are when discussing basketball. Marta stands out as someone with a coach's eye for the game. Jordy and Tess also embody the poised leadership roles. Really excited to see more as the season goes on!The one and only area of Marta's game that isn't phenomenal is, to my eye anyway, that she isn't very quick. She gets the job done for the most part, but it remains to be seen how she'd fare if opposing coaches stick their quickest defender on her.
But OMG! I think she may be this season's Keyen Green as far as leadership is concerned. In the Carson-Newman game she was the one always directing teammates and talking to them on the floor. And when she shoots she KNOWS it's going in. You can see that in her body language. I could not be happier knowing we've got three full seasons of Marta Suarez to look forward to.
Bird wasn't quick either....She could be our Larry bird!!The one and only area of Marta's game that isn't phenomenal is, to my eye anyway, that she isn't very quick. She gets the job done for the most part, but it remains to be seen how she'd fare if opposing coaches stick their quickest defender on her.
But OMG! I think she may be this season's Keyen Green as far as leadership is concerned. In the Carson-Newman game she was the one always directing teammates and talking to them on the floor. And when she shoots she KNOWS it's going in. You can see that in her body language. I could not be happier knowing we've got three full seasons of Marta Suarez to look forward to.
I go back and forth between Walker starting versus Marta or Puckett. Walker, according to Coach, is one of the best defenders on the team. I think having her leadership and defense to hold down the other teams' smaller guards is critical for us at the start of any game. I imagine Walker will be that 5th starter for those reasons.
I'm not convinced that's the best starting lineup, either. I'd like to see if the team does better with another rebounder/post scorer in the starting lineup, such as Franklin or Hollingshead. But the coach knows a ton more basketball than me, so I'm ok with it either way.
Agree on all points, but I think KJH thinks Walker brings a calm maturity and focus to get the game started on the right foot. Also, her motor is always on high and that helps set a tone. But we probably got a good indication how that will go when Walker got subbed out just 5 mins into the game last Sunday. It was Darby who subbed against C-N, but I also think eventually it will be Marta or Puckett getting the majority of those mins.I'm not convinced that's the best starting lineup, either. I'd like to see if the team does better with another rebounder/post scorer in the starting lineup, such as Franklin or Hollingshead. But the coach knows a ton more basketball than me, so I'm ok with it either way.
Agree on all points, but I think KJH thinks Walker brings a calm maturity and focus to get the game started on the right foot. Also, her motor is always on high and that helps set a tone. But we probably got a good indication how that will go when Walker got subbed out just 5 mins into the game last Sunday. It was Darby who subbed against C-N, but I also think eventually it will be Marta or Puckett getting the majority of those mins.
Walker is like a good baseball utility player; there's alot she does well and can be inserted in lots of different situations so I think she gets plenty of important mins.
At first at least, I see Franklin/Hollingshead as relief for Key, and very high quality relief at that.