bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 73,786
- Likes
- 49,554
Fair but there are plenty of mid major players that find success at the P5 level. I just think it’s a little unfair to judge him off of past players’ success rate. Besides them being from a mid-major conference, they share no similarities.I'm not talking about game. My point was Key was a solid shooter at the mid major level, then he got here and couldn't play. Same thing with EJ Anosike.
K State was carried by a P5 transfer.
Texas was as well.
These mid major bums don't translate to this level.
Go look at UCONN’s transfers, you know, the team that won the whole thing in dominating fashion.I'm not talking about game. My point was Key was a solid shooter at the mid major level, then he got here and couldn't play. Same thing with EJ Anosike.
K State was carried by a P5 transfer.
Texas was as well.
These mid major bums don't translate to this level.
UConn transfers aren't really as indicative of what we can expect as the actual transfers Barnes has taken. People seem offended that some of us think Gainey is a poor scholarship take. Barnes hasn't really torn it up in the portal to this point. You yourself said that your opinion changed if he was scholarship. Now we have a somewhat credible news source saying he will be. Hopefully he's wrong, but if he's not, it's disappointing.Go look at UCONN’s transfers, you know, the team that won the whole thing in dominating fashion.
Gained scored 24 @ Clemson and 13 @ south carolina
If he’s a bench piece/role player…I don’t see how he’s a bad addition? Especially as a 40% career 3 pt shooter
How do you figure? The OP said these mid majors guys don’t translate, yet UCONN (the national champions) had mid major transfers, that’s all I was saying. If you want to debate that then go ahead, but that’s all I was saying.UConn transfers aren't really as indicative of what we can expect as the actual transfers Barnes has taken.
It's the player + the coach. What mid major transfer has been successful Herr under Barnes? I remember we took a really good transfer guard named Daniel, he wasn't very good either.Fair but there are plenty of mid major players that find success at the P5 level. I just think it’s a little unfair to judge him off of past players’ success rate. Besides them being from a mid-major conference, they share no similarities.
You also have to factor that he will have better players around him here to practice against and play with. Plus he won't have to be the guy here and won't have the pressure to force up shots to keep his team in the game.He was 18-57 vs high majors last year, 31 percent from the field. 4-`17 from 3 vs high majors, 23 percent from there. Competition matters a great deal.