johnfnkelly
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2017
- Messages
- 3,873
- Likes
- 14,083
If he can hit his free throws he can help us end game with our 3 guard lineup at worst. Again he comes in as a veteran than can be a leader, and be your 2nd or 3rd guy off the bench. I think he can fit the role he will be asked to do if it comes to that. Also team chemistry is big and he will only help that.Key's numbers are somewhat promising but his film is.. not. "old man ymca" is a good way to describe his game.
Undersized, not a real explosive athlete and not a strong ball handler either.
A lot of his buckets come from bullying smaller guards in his conference. That's not gonna fly in the SEC. He's giving me guard version Anosike vibes.
If the alternative is to take another Tamba type prospect then I guess a one year rental of Key off the bench isn't the worst, assuming we bring in another lead guard.
Put up 18/4/3 against Purdue last year:Key's numbers are somewhat promising but his film is.. not. "old man ymca" is a good way to describe his game.
Undersized, not a real explosive athlete and not a strong ball handler either.
A lot of his buckets come from bullying smaller guards in his conference. That's not gonna fly in the SEC. He's giving me guard version Anosike vibes.
If the alternative is to take another Tamba type prospect then I guess a one year rental of Key off the bench isn't the worst, assuming we bring in another lead guard.
Fair enough. As times are changing with the portal, guess it makes sense that the coaching philosophy adjusts some too. Asking players who are bought in and working hard doing what you're asking to leave hasn't struck me as RB and staff's M.O. the last few years but I understand they have to do what's both best for the program and the player, in that order sometimes.Staff wants the spot
Put up 18/4/3 against Purdue last year:
36mins 18pts 8-14fg 6-9fg2pt 2-5fg3pt
His sophomore/junior/season year he played against 12 P5 teams including Loyola Chicago as one, his averages…
33.5mpg 13.7ppg 4.3rpg 2.0apg 50.3%fg 57.3-%2ptfg 38.2%3ptfg 89.5%ft
Anyone we pursue Barnes sees as a fit, so it’s not like that can preclude any conversation about the players. The guy can score and was their go-to. Known for that more so than his defense. We see what happens w players under Barnes who can’t defend at a high level. He’d have a very different role here. That’s why I think it would be an interesting fit.It’s 2 years in a row they’ve tried to add him, I’m guessing there’s something Barnes sees as a fit/is attracted to
It’s not without a landing spot and without Diboundje being on board, it’s not running him out of town type deal…Schwartz was his recruiter and the coach who knew him best so it’s a good situation for all parties.Fair enough. As times are changing with the portal, guess it makes sense that the coaching philosophy adjusts some too. Asking players who are bought in and working hard doing what you're asking to leave hasn't struck me as RB and staff's M.O. the last few years but I understand they have to do what's both best for the program and the player, in that order sometimes.
Makes sense. I see it's not exactly a negative situation, but it doesn't feel entirely positive either. Just my opinion though. Wish him the best and I trust Barnes and his team nonetheless.It’s not without a landing spot and without Diboundje being on board, it’s not running him out of town type deal…Schwartz was his recruiter and the coach who knew him best so it’s a good situation for all parties.
I don’t disagree, won’t know till it happens, guys have panned out and others have flopped…Texas Tech & Purdue are interested in him as well, so much like Anosike it isn’t just Barnes and staff interested at this level. Again what I would reiterate is that it will be nice that he likely won’t relied on in a major way, if he pans out great, if not it’s not a huge deal.Anosike had some solid outings against P5 teams as well. It's just a different grind when it's every night.
That's kind of where I'm at.Key's numbers are somewhat promising but his film is.. not. "old man ymca" is a good way to describe his game.
Undersized, not a real explosive athlete and not a strong ball handler either.
A lot of his buckets come from bullying smaller guards in his conference. That's not gonna fly in the SEC. He's giving me guard version Anosike vibes.
If the alternative is to take another Tamba type prospect then I guess a one year rental of Key off the bench isn't the worst, assuming we bring in another lead guard.
As some have also alluded to, good luck attracting a top tier transfer or recruit if you Phillips & Yuri to what currently exists…I highly doubt you are finding anyone willing to come here better than Key and that doesn’t cause a stink if they aren’t getting big minutes.
I believe it’s 200 total minutes (5x40 mins per game)Very fair...
Santi, JJJ both are going to be starting and getting north of 28 MPG. ZZ you expect to see getting 20+ as well. If ON is a 20+ guy and then you add Yuri that 1-4 minute rotation is pretty slim pickings.
160 minutes total available...
Santi - 30
JJJ - 28
ZZ - 22
Yuri - 30 (about what KC was getting)
ON - 20
130 or so minutes, not much meat left for a big time transfer...and if Phillips is here there is far, far less.
200 minutes available in a game, but yea, still slim pickings if you’re talking about adding Yuri & Phillips to the mix already.Very fair...
Santi, JJJ both are going to be starting and getting north of 28 MPG. ZZ you expect to see getting 20+ as well. If ON is a 20+ guy and then you add Yuri that 1-4 minute rotation is pretty slim pickings.
160 minutes total available...
Santi - 30
JJJ - 28
ZZ - 22
Yuri - 30 (about what KC was getting)
ON - 20
130 or so minutes, not much meat left for a big time transfer...and if Phillips is here there is far, far less.
As some have also alluded to, good luck attracting a top tier transfer or recruit if you Phillips & Yuri to what currently exists…I highly doubt you are finding anyone willing to come here better than Key and that doesn’t cause a stink if they aren’t getting big minutes.
All staffs do this but the good ones support the kid and help them with finding the right fit somewhere else.Fair enough. As times are changing with the portal, guess it makes sense that the coaching philosophy adjusts some too. Asking players who are bought in and working hard doing what you're asking to leave hasn't struck me as RB and staff's M.O. the last few years but I understand they have to do what's both best for the program and the player, in that order sometimes.