Tennessee's Anti-LGBTQ LT. Governor, Randy McNally, Loves Naked Pics of Gay Man

#151
#151
scooty_vol said:
I agree but it is the government's job to protect innocent people from harm, including kids. . When I say government, I'm referring to the local government, the local government should have more power than the federal government because the people should be able to hold them more accountable than a federal government. I know this isn't the case, but that would be better. The Bible does mention how the government should work, it's says the church should play a roll, as well as local government with the federal gov having the least power. Our country used to have this style but it is the opposite now
Click to expand...
The Constitution says what role the bible should play in our govt
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeMojo
#152
#152
scooty_vol said:
I agree but it is the government's job to protect innocent people from harm, including kids. . When I say government, I'm referring to the local government, the local government should have more power than the federal government because the people should be able to hold them more accountable than a federal government. I know this isn't the case, but that would be better. The Bible does mention how the government should work, it's says the church should play a roll, as well as local government with the federal gov having the least power. Our country used to have this style but it is the opposite now
Click to expand...

Its not any level of governments job to protect people from harm.

Now for the mouth breathers I’m not talking about external threats from a foreign power or terrorist
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeMojo
#154
#154
hog88 said:
Its not any level of governments job to protect people from harm.

Now for the mouth breathers I’m not talking about external threats from a foreign power or terrorist
Click to expand...

The government role is to deal with criminals, arrest criminals.
 
#156
#156
scooty_vol said:
It doesn't say what you think it does. Either way, looking at what your government is doing now, I'd say the Biblical intent for government is better.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure it says nothing about involving the bible in our govt. It has no place
 
#157
#157
utvolpj said:
I'm pretty sure it says nothing about involving the bible in our govt. It has no place
Click to expand...
All it says is "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"

At the time of ratification, many of the states actually did have religious establishment laws, most of which were repealed in the first half of the 19th century. But not one was declared unconstitutional. It would seem unlikely the authors of the Constitution would have been unaware of their own states' laws and ignored them while drafting the First amendment.

For the record, I am against the establishment of religion by individual states.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf and hog88
#158
#158
utvolpj said:
I'm pretty sure it says nothing about involving the bible in our govt. It has no place
Click to expand...

It should have a place. We're seeing the results of a government that does reject the Bible.

I believe many people like you, given the choice, would rather see a corrupt government than one that gives the slightest credence to the Bible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and whodeycin85
#159
#159
scooty_vol said:
It should have a place. We're seeing the results of a government that does reject the Bible.

I believe many people like you, given the choice, would rather see a corrupt government than one that gives the slightest credence to the Bible.
Click to expand...

I just want the .gov to follow the constitution, that should be it's Bible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#160
#160
GroverCleveland said:
All it says is "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"

At the time of ratification, many of the states actually did have religious establishment laws, most of which were repealed in the first half of the 19th century. But not one was declared unconstitutional. It would seem unlikely the authors of the Constitution would have been unaware of their own states' laws and ignored them while drafting the First amendment.

For the record, I am against the establishment of religion by individual states.
Click to expand...

The founding fathers set laws in place to defend religion, the left, as with everthing, twisted it through lies and propaganda that religion has no place in government. Of course when people say religion, they mean Christianity. It is ultimately a battle against Christianity, not religion
 
#162
#162
scooty_vol said:
The founding fathers set laws in place to defend religion, the left, as with everthing, twisted it through lies and propaganda that religion has no place in government. Of course when people say religion, they mean Christianity. It is ultimately a battle against Christianity, not religion
Click to expand...

The FF didn't set anything in place to defend religion, the set the BORs in place to defend the citizens FROM religion. They saw how the European monarchs used religion to justify their positions and actions and did not want that here.
 
#164
#164
scooty_vol said:
It should have a place. We're seeing the results of a government that does reject the Bible.

I believe many people like you, given the choice, would rather see a corrupt government than one that gives the slightest credence to the Bible.
Click to expand...
The govt has always rejected the bible in favor of the constitution. As it should

The bible should not be used to govern.
 
#165
#165
utvolpj said:
The govt has always rejected the bible in favor of the constitution. As it should

The bible should not be used to govern.
Click to expand...

Yeah, those pesky morals, as I say, many of you would rather see children be attacked, with the government's blessing, than follow the Bible. The results speak for themselves, our current state speaks for itself. The results of our rejection of the Bible speaks for itself
 
#167
#167
hog88 said:
The FF didn't set anything in place to defend religion, the set the BORs in place to defend the citizens FROM religion. They saw how the European monarchs used religion to justify their positions and actions and did not want that here.
Click to expand...
Eh, not so sure here @hog88. I would say the BOR was in place to defend the citizens from FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MANDATED religion and to also protect religion from the federal government.
 
#168
#168
GroverCleveland said:
Eh, not so sure here @hog88. I would say the BOR was in place to defend the citizens from FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MANDATED religion and to also protect religion from the federal government.
Click to expand...

That's fair. I agree that nothing in the constitution prevented states from establishing a religion but in doing so they couldn't use that state religion to violate the other sections of the BORs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
#169
#169
scooty_vol said:
Both are repulsive but if you're looking at percentages, the majority would be homosexuals, if you took a poll the vast majority that support pedophilia would be homosexuals. They already have a debased mind so that would naturally (or unnaturally) be the next progression
Click to expand...
Simply not true. The vast majority of child sex abusers are heterosexual. Furthermore, pedophilia has little to do with sexuality. Child abuse is abhorrent and perpetrators should face severe punishment. I think we all agree. There is no need to perpetuate tired, wholly false stereotypes.

Groups like NMBLA have attempted several times to associate with the LGBTQ community and are always roundly rejected.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top