Tennessee's Anti-LGBTQ LT. Governor, Randy McNally, Loves Naked Pics of Gay Man

[jp1]

The "we just want to protect children" narrative is subterfuge.

Republicans are legislating against a lifestyle which they find unseemly ... or at least pretend to find unseemly. I think there are several Randy McNally-types in their midst. McNally is not an outlier at all, when it comes to closeted, Republican homosexuals, who target gays and lesbians with regulation. He is ashamed of what he is ... so he compensates for it by attacking gays and lesbians who have the courage to be who they really are in public. It's both jealousy and cowardice.

What even brought this piece of legislation up?

 

[scooty_vol]

I think he's wanting to shame the republicans or something ... never mind his Democrats.

Democrats are way beyond that. I believe their new focus are kids. The homosexuality is old and boring.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Drag show clubs and strip clubs are not that far apart. They've always been treated the same, adult nightlife. The law lumps the two together. It's not that complicated to me. Maybe it's not necessary. But I don't see how its a first amendment issue.

No offense but it doesn't sound like you've been to either.

 

[Weezy]

No offense but it doesn't sound like you've been to either.

I've never been to a drag show. But I think both fall under the same category. That's probably the gap here. You think drag shows are some other category, like karaoke. But to me, it's more like a strip club, inherently sexual or kink. Meant for adults. In Tennessee, you are the minority.

Whatever the gap, doesn't make it that complicated. Drag shows are classified with stripping in Tennessee now.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

I've never been to a drag show. But I think both fall under the same category. That's probably the gap here. You think drag shows are some other category, like karaoke. But to me, it's more like a strip club, inherently sexual or kink. Meant for adults. In Tennessee, you are the minority.

Whatever the gap, doesn't make it that complicated. Drag shows are classified with stripping in Tennessee now.

For now*

So you're making a comparison and basing a facet of your argument off that comparison with no firsthand knowledge of half the comparison.


Okie dokey.

This bill ain't holding up.

 

[joevol33]

No, you don't. You've demonstrated it several times by referencing transgenderism in a discussion about drag.

Just admit that you're way out of your element here, and that your world is so very small.

If you think my world is small because I don't accept men dressing as women and being around kids, then you're entitled to that opinion. Whatever you want to label it, both are playing make believe, and I'm entitled to my opinion.

 

[lawgator1]

Some interviews of the Lt. Governor out today. I am not entirely sure he is sober.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

If you think my world is small because I don't accept men dressing as women and being around kids, then you're entitled to that opinion. Whatever you want to label it, both are playing make believe, and I'm entitled to my opinion.

You are, but it's still obvious that you've lived a very sheltered existence and haven't seen much of the world.

Way worse things in far greater abundance that children are routinely exposed to, yet this triggers you quite a bit more than it should.

 

[joevol33]

You are, but it's still obvious that you've lived a very sheltered existence and haven't seen much of the world.

Way worse things in far greater abundance that children are routinely exposed to, yet this triggers you quite a bit more than it should.

Again, if you think I'm 'sheltered ' because I don't like men dressing up as women, that's on you. I'm sure you've not gotten into many things that I like, and could call you sheltered for it. You're the one that responded to my comments, so it seems you're the one triggered that I don't agree with it.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Again, if you think I'm 'sheltered ' because I don't like men dressing up as women, that's on you. I'm sure you've not gotten into many things that I like, and could call you sheltered for it. You're the one that responded to my comments, so it seems you're the one triggered that I don't agree with it.

I wouldn't even begin to compare my human experience to yours. I wager yours is a brochure compared to mine.

 

[joevol33]

I wouldn't even begin to compare my human experience to yours. I wager yours is a brochure compared to mine.

I really don't care, different things make different people happy. I wouldn't trade my family and experiences for someone who's butt hurt over men dressing up as women and hanging around kids for anything. If you think that makes you special, because you've made it clear that your problem is me saying they shouldn't be around kids, then that speaks a lot about your perversion. I'd honestly like to know why you, and the left, thinks it's so important for men to dress up like women, and hang around kids? It's not like I said anywhere they shouldn't play dress up, I said they don't need to be around children. You got big mad about that, said I was sheltered because I don't think they should be around kids, even trying to make my life sound so boring compared to you, because you want them around kids. It's sick man, and you're sick for even fighting for them to be around kids. If they're not pedos, then why are you so triggered defending them being around kids?

 

[MercyPercy]

I really don't care, different things make different people happy. I wouldn't trade my family and experiences for someone who's butt hurt over men dressing up as women and hanging around kids for anything. If you think that makes you special, because you've made it clear that your problem is me saying they shouldn't be around kids, then that speaks a lot about your perversion. I'd honestly like to know why you, and the left, thinks it's so important for men to dress up like women, and hang around kids? It's not like I said anywhere they shouldn't play dress up, I said they don't need to be around children. You got big mad about that, said I was sheltered because I don't think they should be around kids, even trying to make my life sound so boring compared to you, because you want them around kids. It's sick man, and you're sick for even fighting for them to be around kids. If they're not pedos, then why are you so triggered defending them being around kids?

Do you think they're pedos?

 

[joevol33]

Do you think they're pedos?

I think it's odd that they specifically want to be around children while dressing up as women. I find it even more odd that some people are only mad about people trying to keep them away from children. Are they all? Likely not, but absolutely some are. Heck, you have people who get jobs in schools, churches, day care, etc just because they are perverted towards kids. You can't tell me that some pervert wouldn't use this as their opportunity. Again though, I don't understand the fight, it's not about their right to dress as women, he's mad because I said they shouldn't be doing it around kids.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

I think it's odd that they specifically want to be around children while dressing up as women. I find it even more odd that some people are only mad about people trying to keep them away from children. Are they all? Likely not, but absolutely some are. Heck, you have people who get jobs in schools, churches, day care, etc just because they are perverted towards kids. You can't tell me that some pervert wouldn't use this as their opportunity. Again though, I don't understand the fight, it's not about their right to dress as women, he's mad because I said they shouldn't be doing it around kids.

Clearly that has to be why I'm mad.

Dumbass.

 

[joevol33]

Clearly that has to be why I'm mad.

Dumbass.

Here's me saying they shouldn't be around kids, then you responding that I'm sheltered. If there's another reason, you haven't been crying about it, only upset over the kids. You went as far as saying kids have been around worse things. That's your words, in English. And please stop calling me names behind your keyboard, it's so scary 

 

[n_huffhines]

There are plenty of laws protecting children from perverts (both straight and gay), and that's good with me. You do you, though.

So disingenuous

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Here's me saying they shouldn't be around kids, then you responding that I'm sheltered. If there's another reason, you haven't been crying about it, only upset over the kids. You went as far as saying kids have been around worse things. That's your words, in English. And please stop calling me names behind your keyboard, it's so scary View attachment 541098

You are sheltered. Small man, small world.

Actually i've stated that you, along with everyone else in support of the nanny state here, don't actually give a **** about the kids. This is just a vessel for your aversion to homosexuality, drag, and transgender. It's the disingenuous nature of your disdain that causes me to utterly dismiss any possibility you want an honest discussion.

I've also stated several times that I wouldn't bring my kids to a drag show. I'm just not going to support the government telling people how to raise their kids more than I already do, because I, unlike you, favor small government.

 

[joevol33]

You are sheltered. Small man, small world.

Actually i've stated that you, along with everyone else in support of the nanny state here, don't actually give a **** about the kids. This is just a vessel for your aversion to homosexuality, drag, and transgender. It's the disingenuous nature of your disdain that causes me to utterly dismiss any possibility you want an honest discussion.

I've also stated several times that I wouldn't bring my kids to a drag show. I'm just not going to support the government telling people how to raise their kids more than I already do, because I, unlike you, favor small government.

Again, not once have I said anything about the government being right. I'm absolutely conservative in my views, and have said multiple times I don't even think the government should ban abortion. If you're gonna accuse, then back it up. Quote me one time saying anything against gay people, just once. I'm not accusing you if anything that I haven't quoted your exact words. We can't have a discussion because you just throw out false statements and call names, that's all you have. One of my daughters friends is gay, spent the night here Tuesday, does all the time. We never treat her bad, ever. You don't know crap about me, you're mad because of my opinion, and making stuff up in your head. I don't know if it's because of your news, social media, or what, but nothing you're saying is true, except I don't think grown men dressing as women should be around kids. Now if you can quote me saying anything, I don't like gays, I want more government, I agree with this law, anything, then do it. If not, stop making stuff up, and stick with the facts of our conversation. It's pretty sad, you know nothing about my life, what I do, and you're trying to say I don't have one based on nothing except I don't agree with them being around kids. Literally man, anyone with a tad of compression can see that. We're not going to agree, you can think I have a boring life, I don't care. Just stick with my words like I am you, nothing you're accusing me of is true, at all.

 

[DinkinFlicka]

Again, not once have I said anything about the government being right. I'm absolutely conservative in my views, and have said multiple times I don't even think the government should ban abortion. If you're gonna accuse, then back it up. Quote me one time saying anything against gay people, just once. I'm not accusing you if anything that I haven't quoted your exact words. We can't have a discussion because you just throw out false statements and call names, that's all you have. One of my daughters friends is gay, spent the night here Tuesday, does all the time. We never treat her bad, ever. You don't know crap about me, you're mad because of my opinion, and making stuff up in your head. I don't know if it's because of your news, social media, or what, but nothing you're saying is true, except I don't think grown men dressing as women should be around kids. Now if you can quote me saying anything, I don't like gays, I want more government, I agree with this law, anything, then do it. If not, stop making stuff up, and stick with the facts of our conversation. It's pretty sad, you know nothing about my life, what I do, and you're trying to say I don't have one based on nothing except I don't agree with them being around kids. Literally man, anyone with a tad of compression can see that. We're not going to agree, you can think I have a boring life, I don't care. Just stick with my words like I am you, nothing you're accusing me of is true, at all.

"Tad of compression"

Lol

You compared trans to drag earlier. You have ignorant views of the LGBTQ community. When you only say they shouldn't be around kids without stating your opinion of the bill in a discussion about the bill, then one can only be led to believe you support the bill. If you don't, I'll own that mistake.

You also accused me of defending children's attending drag shows when I have stated the opposite multiple times. Don't act as though I'm the only one baselessly accusing you of being a mental vegetable here.

 

[LadyVolette]

I think he's wanting to shame the republicans or something ... never mind his Democrats.

He’s wanting to stir up sh!t but nobody gives a sh!t

 

[LadyVolette]

Democrats are way beyond that. I believe their new focus are kids. The homosexuality is old and boring.

I think that’s where it’s headed TBH.. grooming.. and if I were a gay person, which I’m not.. I would make sure they put a stop to all of these alphabet letters before it gets to that point

 

[whodeycin85]

I think that’s where it’s headed TBH.. grooming.. and if I were a gay person, which I’m not.. I would make sure they put a stop to all of these alphabet letters before it gets to that point

Sad part is many in the gay community do not support child sexualization..but any person that identifies under the alphabet mafia is given a gas as acceptable behavior..

 

[joevol33]

"Tad of compression"

Lol

You compared trans to drag earlier. You have ignorant views of the LGBTQ community. When you only say they shouldn't be around kids without stating your opinion of the bill in a discussion about the bill, then one can only be led to believe you support the bill. If you don't, I'll own that mistake.

You also accused me of defending children's attending drag shows when I have stated the opposite multiple times. Don't act as though I'm the only one baselessly accusing you of being a mental vegetable here.

I said either, doesn't matter which one, doesn't need to be at schools. If that's ignorant to you, then oh well. I also, in response to someone else, said in this thread that I don't agree with the bill. I'm not for more governance.

 

[LadyVolette]

Sad part is many in the gay community do not support child sexualization..but any person that identifies under the alphabet mafia is given a gas as acceptable behavior..

I think the majority of gay people find child sexualization as repugnant, but there are definitely some fringe wackos who are want to legitimize the pedo stuff, I have no doubt.. and when you do that, it makes other people think you are all on board with it, because that is how it looks

 

[sonofUT62]

I think the majority of gay people find child sexualization as repugnant, but there are definitely some fringe wackos who are want to legitimize the pedo stuff, I have no doubt.. and when you do that, it makes other people think you are all on board with it, because that is how it looks

There are definitely straight people trying to normalize pedophilia. It’s certainly not something limited to the gay community. Should we ban strip clubs because sometimes lunch ladies like to get it on with 13 year old boys? It’s just a bad law, it’s going to get struck down and it’s super embarrassing.