lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,736
- Likes
- 42,919
I was waiting for you to post this after it broke yesterday LG. When I saw it had made MSNBC last night when I was channel surfing I knew it was a matter of time. Is condemnation really needed? The law was broken and those responsible should be punished accordingly.
Not sure that's good enough.
According to some on here, the lack of outrage by Muslims to 9/11 was proof that Islam is evil and was complicit in the terrorism of 9/11.
By the same logic, all Christians are obligated to disavow this act of terrorism. If not, Christianity is logically to blame.
That is, according to the logic of some on here.
Not sure that's good enough.
According to some on here, the lack of outrage by Muslims to 9/11 was proof that Islam is evil and was complicit in the terrorism of 9/11.
By the same logic, all Christians are obligated to disavow this act of terrorism. If not, Christianity is logically to blame.
That is, according to the logic of some on here.
Posted via VolNation MobileLet me get this straight, you are lumping setting fire to construction equipment to the mass destruction of lives and leveling entire city blocks of a major city?
You actually think they deserve equal condemnation? A couple of idiotic rednecks as opposed to a highly organized and financed operation like we saw on 9-11. They deserve equal treatment?
Not sure that's good enough.
According to some on here, the lack of outrage by Muslims to 9/11 was proof that Islam is evil and was complicit in the terrorism of 9/11.
By the same logic, all Christians are obligated to disavow this act of terrorism. If not, Christianity is logically to blame.
That is, according to the logic of some on here.
Let me get this straight, you are lumping setting fire to construction equipment to the mass destruction of lives and leveling entire city blocks of a major city?
You actually think they deserve equal condemnation? A couple of idiotic rednecks as opposed to a highly organized and financed operation like we saw on 9-11. They deserve equal treatment?
Here's how I see it, if they were Christian zealots carrying out attacks in the name of Christ then they must be condemned by those of the Christian faith. If they were just some idiotic kids or drunken rednecks (much more likely given the scope of the damage) nothing more needs to be said beyond punish them according to the law.
We should just wait for the police to do their work and as details become known we can figure out which group is obligated to condemn their own.
Not sure that's good enough.
According to some on here, the lack of outrage by Muslims to 9/11 was proof that Islam is evil and was complicit in the terrorism of 9/11.
By the same logic, all Christians are obligated to disavow this act of terrorism. If not, Christianity is logically to blame.
That is, according to the logic of some on here.
First, of course I am not equating the two qualitatively. I am just trying to point out that it is simply incorrect to assume that all people who might share the faith or the general politics of perpetrators are responsible for the acts of the fringe.
I just hope that everyone would take a deep breath and realize the level of fear and hate out there is high right now, has been spooled up by some very irresponsible grandstanding people, and realize it does not take much to push some people over the line between debate and protest versus lighting stuff on fire.
Please show evidence that this was an act of Christians on behalf of some perverted view of Christianity. Likewise with political affiliation and link to motivation.
If it was designed to intimidate then it was terrorism. If not it was vandalism. Either way it was wrong.
About 2 years ago, 3 dumb arse college kids here burned down 9 or 10 Baptist churches. Turns out they were just D-bags looking for attention. It wasn't terrorism but deservedly so they are sitting in jail right now.