Pacer92
Youneverknow
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 15,847
- Likes
- 18,597
This speaks volumes to who wants division...
There is no doubt as to who is pushing racial division.
Here's the story.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...nt-ceremony/6tGHbUjyz8vLvDNVZwzidL/story.html
This speaks volumes to who wants division...
That is racist, yes. I have no problem saying that. The problem is when people then start saying, "I got called a cracker the other day...so that puts me in the same position as all these people of color who are 'complaining,' and allows me to invalidate what they're saying."
It's not the tune of slavery, it's the tune of racism, which you and I both know didn't expire in 1865.
Student organizers said the event, called Black Commencement 2017, is the first universitywide ceremony for black students at Harvard and is designed to celebrate their unique struggles and achievements at an elite institution that has been grappling with its historic ties to slavery.
Last year, Drew Faust, university president, and Representative John Lewis, a Georgia Democrat who is a civil rights icon, unveiled a plaque commemorating four slaves who had been owned by Harvard presidents. The university also agreed to redesign the Harvard Law School shield, which was modeled on the family crest of an 18th-century slaveholder.
Woods said the black graduation ceremony will recognize that history, as well as the challenges that black students face today
If we want to "solve" the race problem, we first have to address it. Part of addressing it is examining the whitewashed version of history that we teach. I don't think that aspect of it should really offend anyone.
If we want to "solve" the race problem, we first have to address it. Part of addressing it is examining the whitewashed version of history that we teach. I don't think that aspect of it should really offend anyone.
If we want to "solve" the race problem, we first have to address it. Part of addressing it is examining the whitewashed version of history that we teach. I don't think that aspect of it should really offend anyone.
lol what about history would you like changed?
And for the record: Afrocentrism is a horribly inaccurate and racist ideology
lol what about history would you like changed?
And for the record: Afrocentrism is a horribly inaccurate and racist ideology
I didn't see Nash espousing Afrocentrism.
The separatism, having to have a 'separate' commencement is going back to the days of "separate but equal" segregation. Will we have segregated "safe spaces" now?
While it is going back to segregation, people on the left don't see it as a bad thing since the evil White devil isn't the one forcing them to do it. By them doing it on their own accord it becomes empowering..or something similarly as stupid.
lol what about history would you like changed?
And for the record: Afrocentrism is a horribly inaccurate and racist ideology
...aaaaand that's why racism will never die.
The problem is when race is addressed, you know, like everyone says how they "want to talk about it"..when it is "talked" about, reality kicks in and a lot of people who want to examine a "whitewashed history" have a hard time coming to terms with reality. They often find it difficult to separate fact from fantasy thus they get excited and start calling people "ignint", and start howling about racism that, racist this, White supremacy, whitewashed history, etc, etc, etc.
Whitewashing of history is an issue if you never made it past middle school. If you did, maybe you should have paid more attention in your history classes.