That's racist!

[ButchPlz]

Has nothing to do with their sexuality, based on the statement being scrutinized I would say intellect is fair game.

This comment itself? No.

But there's a reason the nuclear family structure has been what it is for centuries. Combine a kid/kid(s) missing important parental influences in their life with this level of outright idiocy and the kid/kid(s) is/are probably doomed.

 

[KB5252]

This comment itself? No.

But there's a reason the nuclear family structure has been what it is for centuries. Combine a kid/kid(s) missing important parental influences in their life with this level of outright idiocy and the kid/kid(s) is/are probably doomed.

I haven't seen studies to establish my opinions as fact but I'm sure a kid with two dad's or two mom's would fare better than a kid with a single parent who works all the time and left them to their own devices.

The point is their sex/sexuality has little to do with the parenting job they will or can do.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

There is already a push for “Brown” as well.

So we could end up with Black, white, Brown, & Native. There by implying that “white” is somehow different or unique, set apart from the rest?

Can’t make this stuff up.

But then all those that are capitalized will complain and then.....

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Idiocracy

Brandon's cabinet:

 

[StarRaider]

 

[85SugarVol]

Lol. The “whites”

 

[Rickyvol77]

Lol another BS “study” based on a misconceived notion

 

[volinbham]

Brandon's cabinet:

water? you mean like out of the toilet?

 

[volinbham]

Lol another BS “study” based on a misconceived notion

This is interesting - only the position that blacks are more violent than whites is considered a negative racial stereotype but the position that whites are more violent than blacks is not considered a negative racial stereotype.

 

[Rickyvol77]

This is interesting - only the position that blacks are more violent than whites is considered a negative racial stereotype but the position that whites are more violent than blacks is not considered a negative racial stereotype.

View attachment 410870

And only one of those is backed up by actual statistics

 

[MG1968]

View attachment 407142

She makes Stacey Abrams look downright svelte.

 

[SamRebel35]

This is interesting - only the position that blacks are more violent than whites is considered a negative racial stereotype but the position that whites are more violent than blacks is not considered a negative racial stereotype.

View attachment 410870

First, what an odd way to ask the question. "Most" whites vs. "Most" blacks???

Apparently, the sensible people who think that neither majority is more violent than the other majority prefer Carson to Jeb Bush too, and nearly prefer him to Obama. So how is liking Ben Carson supposed to be some racist dog whistle position? And don't you find it equally odd that the very progressive white people who think that "most whites are more violent than most blacks" prefer a crusty old white establishment republican to Ben Carson? You know you're in clown world when the white guy more likely to vote for a black guy is considered MORE racist than the white guy who has the black guy dead last as a candidate.

 

[SamRebel35]

And only one of those is backed up by actual statistics

I think you're falling prey to the likely intentionally confusing wording of the question. I don't think you will find any statistics that show "Most blacks" are more violent than "Most whites". You might find that most violent crimes are committed by "x" group. You might find that "x" group has a larger percentage of violent crimes per capita. What you won't find is a statistic that validates any claims about the violence of the majority of group "x" vs. the majority of group "y".

 

[FLVOL_79]

This is interesting - only the position that blacks are more violent than whites is considered a negative racial stereotype but the position that whites are more violent than blacks is not considered a negative racial stereotype.

View attachment 410870

You know data is bogus and slanted when they don't capitalize Whites but do blacks.

 

[SamRebel35]

The more I think about this article, the more ridiculous it becomes. The author primarily relies on confusion to help connect the dots in order to draw a line between voting for a black republican and being a "white supremacist". They single out the Wall Street Journal for mocking the notion that "white supremacists" would elect a black candidate. Then they say, "Actually, being prejudiced doesn't preclude someone for voting for a black candidate". As if having some prejudices is the same as being a white supremacist.

 

[McDad]

The more I think about this article, the more ridiculous it becomes. The author primarily relies on confusion to help connect the dots in order to draw a line between voting for a black republican and being a "white supremacist". They single out the Wall Street Journal for mocking the notion that "white supremacists" would elect a black candidate. Then they say, "Actually, being prejudiced doesn't preclude someone for voting for a black candidate". As if having some prejudices is the same as being a white supremacist.

Those who see the world through race-colored glasses have concluded malignant racism is at the heart of all decisions.
Vote for black candidate = racism
Vote against black candidate = racism
Vote for nobody = racism

These race based reprobates are the opposite of what MLK died for.

 

[SamRebel35]

Interesting quote from the article:

Put another way: Racially prejudiced white voters are not opposed to Black candidates simply because they are Black, but because they believe that most Black candidates will fight for “those people” and not “people like us.”

In summary, white people who lump themselves into an identity group will vote based on who they think will help their perceived group the most, even if it is a black guy. And this is somehow prejudiced or even an indication of "white supremacy"? Can we draw the same conclusions about prejudice and "black supremacy" when a black person who lumps themselves into an identity group votes based on who they think will help their perceived group the most? Yeah, probably not. Double standard to the max.

 

[Sandman 423]

Those who see the world through race-colored glasses have concluded malignant racism is at the heart of all decisions.
Vote for black candidate = racism
Vote against black candidate = racism
Vote for nobody = racism

These race based reprobates are the opposite of what MLK died for.

yeah, but they are quite profitable.

 

[Hoosier_Vol]

 

[TNVOLNAVY]

Whites are being hunted.

AbateHate.com

 

[Rickyvol77]

Video captures 15-year-old girl getting sucker punched during O.C. basketball game | KTLA
no shocker here

 

[RDU VOL#14]

Video captures 15-year-old girl getting sucker punched during O.C. basketball game | KTLA
no shocker here

Former NBA player Corey Benjamin’s daughter drilled that girl . Apparently the mom told her daughter to do it or incited it.

 

[KB5252]

Former NBA player Corey Benjamin’s daughter drilled that girl . Apparently the mom told her daughter to do it or incited it.

Lawsuit coming I'm sure. That's a sad example of a mother.

 

[Vol423]

This is just ridiculous. It reminds me of when the liberals used to use the term Global Warming. They later changed it to Climate Change because they couldn't explain how Global Warming could lead to some of the coldest winters on record.

 

[Vol423]

The more I think about this article, the more ridiculous it becomes. The author primarily relies on confusion to help connect the dots in order to draw a line between voting for a black republican and being a "white supremacist". They single out the Wall Street Journal for mocking the notion that "white supremacists" would elect a black candidate. Then they say, "Actually, being prejudiced doesn't preclude someone for voting for a black candidate". As if having some prejudices is the same as being a white supremacist.

They also completely fail to even consider the idea that Republicans preferred Ben Carson to both Obama and Jeb Bush because Ben Carson was far more conservative than either Obama or Jeb Bush. Ben Carson aligned with their political preferences regardless of his race. Therefore, he had Republican support. Those racist Republican bastards!