mr.checkerboards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 58,376
- Likes
- 98,435
1-5 in the lineup didn’t produce collectivelyIt’s funny how one way or another, everybody always ends up in FACTS CITY sooner or later.
Imagine wanting to get a return on a good product. Did you enjoy losing Freddie and Dansby for nothing?
You’re gonna be really surprised by this, but he didn’t sign a 1 yr $2mn dollar deal.Dansby had a 124 wRC in the second half. I wonder why? Those losers stunk and he had a lot of care free no pressure at bats. First half was terrible per usual
I bang on one through nine regularly because the “easily best team in the league” is in fact not remotely close to being the best team in the league.1-5 in the lineup didn’t produce collectively
6-9 we’re all dfa guys or guys who should be
But sure blame the guy making peanuts hitting 9th. It’s not his fault he was signed as a backed and they rolled with him as a starter for a second year. There was nothing wrong with his production last year out of the 9 spot and both of you clowns were wrong. Nobody said it was a good idea to run him back this year. What time yall philles play?
Bringing Dansby back isnt about the offensive production it's about having a leader in the clubhouse.
- Austin Riley has 9 years left on his contract
- Acuña has 4 years left.
Why would you trade those years away and who would you get that could match their production?
Dansby has hit .243 the past 2 years in Chicago, he wouldn’t have solved our offensive problems this year