The Democratic Party cheated the 2020 election

[tim]

I don’t necessarily call this proof but it is interesting
View attachment 328366

Maybe even suspicious...

 

[vol445]

Maybe even suspicious...

If it’s true then yes definitely fraud. But I haven’t verified it yet.

See that’s calling it like it is not how you wanna see it. Some should try that. Not aimed at you Tim at all

 

[tim]

If it’s true then yes definitely fraud. But I haven’t verified it yet.

See that’s calling it like it is not how you wanna see it. Some should try that. Not aimed at you Tim at all

I know. Some of these things deserve an unbiased explanation and in this day it’s hard to find someone who isn’t. The censoring doesn’t help and in fact it hurts because the censors are biased. We’re all f’d

 

[vol445]

It was posted by a Georgia representative on the forensic analysis they ran on one of the voter machines

26% would make a huge difference in Atlanta

 

[vol445]

Vanderburgh Democratic activist Reed faces felony election fraud charge

 

[loggervol]

No proof, lies all lies I say. Lol

 

[Wafflestomper]

Have you ever questioned the thought about "liberal media" and "conservative media"? Isn't news based on fact, and opinion on moral and political prejudice? Shouldn't news be the same regardless of the journalist - basically invariant - not the same as how people "interpret" fact? What is happening now is that "news" isn't news, rather it is opinion passed off as a factual description of events. News, for example, might be an uninterpreted and unedited video showing interesting after hours activity in a supposedly closed down vote counting operation. Opinion is the postulated explanation about what the activity is nefarious or benign. News is that the facts in question are or are not being investigated by competent authority - opinion may be whether there needs to be investigation or just that simple feel good words by people involved are adequate.

News is what it is because that's what people want; there is no objective standard for what news ought to be. If people demanded facts with no opinion outfits like Fox News and CNN wouldn't exist as we know them. But news outlets could report nothing but facts and still mislead people. For example, by only reporting some pertinent facts instead of all of them.

 

[AM64]

It was posted by a Georgia representative on the forensic analysis they ran on one of the voter machines

26% would make a huge difference in Atlanta

The other big point is that the recount, which I understood was supposedly a hand count, wasn't out of line with the initial count. That would either mean this story is false or there was some very funny business going on during the recount. If what we thought was a hand count was simply feeding the ballots back through the tabulator, then that was a wasted effort - just going through the motions to get the same results.

 

[AM64]

News is what it is because that's what people want; there is no objective standard for what news ought to be. If people demanded facts with no opinion outfits like Fox News and CNN wouldn't exist as we know them. But news outlets could report nothing but facts and still mislead people. For example, by only reporting some pertinent facts instead of all of them.

That's very true, but eventually someone would get around to asking the disturbing questions about why news outlets were only reporting part of the facts. Basically lying by omission.

 

[loggervol]

The other big point is that the recount, which I understood was supposedly a hand count, wasn't out of line with the initial count. That would either mean this story is false or there was some very funny business going on during the recount. If what we thought was a hand count was simply feeding the ballots back through the tabulator, then that was a wasted effort - just going through the motions to get the same results.

Yes, they just recounted the votes. There was no signature verification or audits.

 

[loggervol]

But, they did find votes for Trump that were “accidentally” not counted.

 

[AM64]

Yes, they just recounted the votes. There was no signature verification or audits.

What I meant is that if the software was giving Biden a 20% bonus, a hand count shouldn't do the same. That's why I'm curious if the recount was simply stuffing the same input into the tabulators or doing a real manual count - assuming bureaucrats running election commissions can count.

On top of that is the verification of mail in ballots - presumably a lot of those should never have made it to the tabulating software because of issues like improper signatures, etc.

 

[loggervol]

What I meant is that if the software was giving Biden a 20% bonus, a hand count shouldn't do the same. That's why I'm curious if the recount was simply stuffing the same input into the tabulators or doing a real manual count - assuming bureaucrats running election commissions can count.

On top of that is the verification of mail in ballots - presumably a lot of those should never have made it to the tabulating software because of issues like improper signatures, etc.

Agree, that’s why they need to do a complete audit and vetting of machines and mail in ballots.

 

[Danl]

What I meant is that if the software was giving Biden a 20% bonus, a hand count shouldn't do the same. That's why I'm curious if the recount was simply stuffing the same input into the tabulators or doing a real manual count - assuming bureaucrats running election commissions can count.

On top of that is the verification of mail in ballots - presumably a lot of those should never have made it to the tabulating software because of issues like improper signatures, etc.

I thought that Georgia did a complete hand recount of each and every ballot in the state wherein each ballot was counted by not one, but two, individual human beings and utilizing no machines to scan any ballot.

Hand recount moves ahead under interpretation of Georgia election rules

 

[loggervol]

I thought that Georgia did a complete hand recount of each and every ballot in the state wherein each ballot was counted by not one, but two, individual human beings and utilizing no machines to scan any ballot.

Hand recount moves ahead under interpretation of Georgia election rules

Echo, echo, echo, echo

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Court Rules No Evidence Georgia's Voting Law Discriminates Against Black Voters

“Plaintiffs have not shown, at least at this stage of the proceedings, that any of the provisions have a disparate impact on black voters,” U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee wrote in an order issued Wednesday. The jurist also wrote that the court “cannot find that Plaintiffs have presented enough evidence to show that the Legislature foresaw or knew that S.B. 202 would have a disparate impact on minority voters.”

The Biden administration and the Democrat-affiliated groups also “failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits as to their claims that the provisions” of the election law "intentionally discriminate against black voters in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Fifteenth Amendment and Section 2 of the [Voting Rights Act]," the judge ruled.

The plaintiffs, in their lawsuit, sought to prevent the law's enforcement pertaining to drop boxes as well as the distribution of food, water, and other gifts to voters who are waiting at polling locations. The law also set a deadline to submit applications for absentee ballots, among other measures.

 

[Sea Ray]

Court Rules No Evidence Georgia's Voting Law Discriminates Against Black Voters

“Plaintiffs have not shown, at least at this stage of the proceedings, that any of the provisions have a disparate impact on black voters,” U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee wrote in an order issued Wednesday. The jurist also wrote that the court “cannot find that Plaintiffs have presented enough evidence to show that the Legislature foresaw or knew that S.B. 202 would have a disparate impact on minority voters.”

The Biden administration and the Democrat-affiliated groups also “failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits as to their claims that the provisions” of the election law "intentionally discriminate against black voters in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Fifteenth Amendment and Section 2 of the [Voting Rights Act]," the judge ruled.

The plaintiffs, in their lawsuit, sought to prevent the law's enforcement pertaining to drop boxes as well as the distribution of food, water, and other gifts to voters who are waiting at polling locations. The law also set a deadline to submit applications for absentee ballots, among other measures.

Wasn't that the reason that Atlanta lost the All Star game?

 

[lawgator1]

Surprised to see Ras constantly equating Russian interests to GOP interests, or seeking just to curry favor with GOP posters here on Volnation.

 

[turbovol]

News is what it is because that's what people want; there is no objective standard for what news ought to be. If people demanded facts with no opinion outfits like Fox News and CNN wouldn't exist as we know them. But news outlets could report nothing but facts and still mislead people. For example, by only reporting some pertinent facts instead of all of them.

CNN has always been far more a legit news operation than Fox. CNN in fact was practically nothing but news for years--and was rather boring until Fox came along with its slate of opinion shows and GOP propaganda. It was run from its inception and for many years by a former and prominent GOP operative. CNN has never been run by a Democratic operative.

Fox found a nice market peddling conservative opinion and feigned indignation about liberals to old, conservative Americans. Virtually nobody took the fox "news" operation seriously. If you want real lnews, read AP, Reuters or AFP new stories or major newspapers or a few reputable magazines. Most Americans have never read a good newspaper in their lives--even before the internet--and are not smart enough to separate fact from propaganda, which involves doing some reading/research and having some critical thinking skills. Since the digital revolution things have got even worse, as American nitwits get what they think is news from cable TV, Facebook, Instagram and loads of "infotainment" sites.

Conservatives and Republicans have never liked serious news media because they are anti-intellectual to begin with and because they don't like stories that they perceive to be negative generally or negative about them, if they are public figures. There's a reason that there is almost no such thing as a exceptional conservative newspaper. The WSJ is about the only one--but it's business newspaper. Republicans/conservatives tend to object to reportorial or investigative scrutiny far more than Democrats, partly if not mostly because news reporters tend to be educated and pretty smart and they are prone to asking pointed questions. As a result, Republicans developed a habit of blaming negative news stories about them on the "liberal media"--trying to deflect attention from their corruption or malfeasance. The gangster, of course, took this to a new and dangerous level of with his constant FRAUDULENT charges of "fake news." The only fake is the gangster--lifelong con man/self-promoter. There was nothing fake about any of it--the gangster is deeply corrupt and has done a million and one dishonest things.

 

[BreatheUT]

Court Rules No Evidence Georgia's Voting Law Discriminates Against Black Voters

“Plaintiffs have not shown, at least at this stage of the proceedings, that any of the provisions have a disparate impact on black voters,” U.S. District Judge J.P. Boulee wrote in an order issued Wednesday. The jurist also wrote that the court “cannot find that Plaintiffs have presented enough evidence to show that the Legislature foresaw or knew that S.B. 202 would have a disparate impact on minority voters.”

The Biden administration and the Democrat-affiliated groups also “failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits as to their claims that the provisions” of the election law "intentionally discriminate against black voters in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, Fifteenth Amendment and Section 2 of the [Voting Rights Act]," the judge ruled.

The plaintiffs, in their lawsuit, sought to prevent the law's enforcement pertaining to drop boxes as well as the distribution of food, water, and other gifts to voters who are waiting at polling locations. The law also set a deadline to submit applications for absentee ballots, among other measures.

It was all BS from the beginning. It's a sign that for everything in life victimhood is a strength.

 

[turbovol]

Confirming my points of above:

Teenage journalist removed from Republican event by police​

Quinn Mitchell, who had credentials for New Hampshire political summit, says he was accused of being ‘tracker’ and ‘disturbance’

Teenage journalist removed from Republican event by police

Quinn Mitchell, who had credentials for New Hampshire political summit, says he was accused of being ‘tracker’ and ‘disturbance’

www.theguardian.com

New Hampshire GOP later acknowledged that an feckless volunteer had made a mistake. Classic.

 

[BowlBrother85]

It was all BS from the beginning. It's a sign that for everything in life victimhood is a strength.

True.

Why Donald Trump — and Other Powerful Men — Love to Cast Themselves As Victims

What his “lynching” comment reveals.

www.nymag.com

 

[Carl Pickens]

CNN has always been far more a legit news operation than Fox. CNN in fact was practically nothing but news for years--and was rather boring until Fox came along with its slate of opinion shows and GOP propaganda. It was run from its inception and for many years by a former and prominent GOP operative. CNN has never been run by a Democratic operative.

Fox found a nice market peddling conservative opinion and feigned indignation about liberals to old, conservative Americans. Virtually nobody took the fox "news" operation seriously. If you want real lnews, read AP, Reuters or AFP new stories or major newspapers or a few reputable magazines. Most Americans have never read a good newspaper in their lives--even before the internet--and are not smart enough to separate fact from propaganda, which involves doing some reading/research and having some critical thinking skills. Since the digital revolution things have got even worse, as American nitwits get what they think is news from cable TV, Facebook, Instagram and loads of "infotainment" sites.

Conservatives and Republicans have never liked serious news media because they are anti-intellectual to begin with and because they don't like stories that they perceive to be negative generally or negative about them, if they are public figures. There's a reason that there is almost no such thing as a exceptional conservative newspaper. The WSJ is about the only one--but it's business newspaper. Republicans/conservatives tend to object to reportorial or investigative scrutiny far more than Democrats, partly if not mostly because news reporters tend to be educated and pretty smart and they are prone to asking pointed questions. As a result, Republicans developed a habit of blaming negative news stories about them on the "liberal media"--trying to deflect attention from their corruption or malfeasance. The gangster, of course, took this to a new and dangerous level of with his constant FRAUDULENT charges of "fake news." The only fake is the gangster--lifelong con man/self-promoter. There was nothing fake about any of it--the gangster is deeply corrupt and has done a million and one dishonest things.

Go intercourse yourself

 

[BreatheUT]

True.

Why Donald Trump — and Other Powerful Men — Love to Cast Themselves As Victims

What his “lynching” comment reveals.

www.nymag.com

Lol...this single opinion piece by a leftist does not change my overall point.

Effectively your link is like JG having a 300 yard game then people jumping on the bandwagon with "now see that guy is good."

Other material from this leftist you source around the same time. Her twitter page is littered with leftist propaganda instead of someone who conducts real journalism.

 

[BowlBrother85]

Lol...this single opinion piece by a leftist does not change my overall point.

Effectively your link is like JG having a 300 yard game then people jumping on the bandwagon with "now see that guy is good."

Other material from this leftist you source around the same time. Her twitter page is littered with leftist propaganda instead of someone who conducts real journalism.

Because nobody on the right has ever made the same observation? Trump loves to play the victim. I don't see how that can be argued. He has made it an artform.

Will Trump’s obsession with being a ‘victim’ work with Republicans in 2024 race?

The ultimate indignity would, of course, be if Republicans denied him the nomination, at which point Trump would transform from I’ll-fight-and-die-for-you victim to unadorned loser.

nypost.com

^^^^ The New York Post ^^^^ .... which is one of the oldest conservative media outlets.