The disney insanity continues

#726
#726
Vol8188 said:
Isn’t an education system deciding to teach 1st graders about transgenderism “government enforced culture”?
Click to expand...

I literally have said, in this thread, that I don’t have a problem with a law enforcing clearly defined consensus standards of age-appropriateness for compulsory public education. Pretty sure you responded to it.

Vol8188 said:
You could try simply pointing out the aspects of the bill you object to. But we know vague is your style
Click to expand...

I’ve already done this. I actually enumerated them and gave examples, if I recall correctly. Also in this thread.

Vol8188 said:
What do you believe needs to be openly taught to 5-7 year old kids that is being limited by this bill?
Click to expand...
What part of “I’m literally not advocating for Talking to anyone about anything, donkeylust. So, I’m pretty sure there was nothing creepy for me to realize.

I’m actually advocating for parents being able to choose how their kids are educated.” Are you struggling with? That was also from this thread and you also responded to it.

This is why I say you’re too stupid to bother with. Think about how many people I call stupid and think about the fact that you’re one of the few that are too stupid to be bothered with. Let that sink in. Then try to do better.
 
#727
#727
n_huffhines said:
You can explain polyamorism without any reference to sex. The Bible explains polyamorism...Godly men had concubines. Is it creepy that the Bible explained that?

BTW, pansexuality and polyamorism are very different. So maybe we're not understanding what you mean to say.
Click to expand...

To say that discussing polyamory with a 4 year old isn't an attempt to talk about sex seems like trying to get by on a technicality. There is no plausible explanation for having that discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, -GiveHim6-, norrislakevol and 5 others
#729
#729
VolStrom said:
I am far from illiterate, but you seem to have driven down a path that no one else has, nor wants to.
Click to expand...

I don’t know what’s past illiterate, I thought it stopped there, but it would make sense that there’s like a reverse literacy where you take the wrong meaning from everything you read. I didn’t realize it was a thing and that you had been diagnosed. I apologize for making fun of you for it.
 
#731
#731
RockyTop85 said:
I don’t know what’s past illiterate, I thought it stopped there, but it would make sense that there’s like a reverse literacy where you take the wrong meaning from everything you read. I didn’t realize it was a thing and that you had been diagnosed. I apologize for making fun of you for it.
Click to expand...
Your entire focus of children and sexuality set off red flags to me. I think you have mental issues regarding children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caculator, norrislakevol, OL SMOKEY and 1 other person
#733
#733
ClearwaterVol said:
The bill is broader than the non-existent problem. It's funny that republicans who supposedly want less laws now support a law that is horribly written and will do nothing but encourage litigation.
Click to expand...
The crown act is horribly written and will encourage litigation? Wow, for once I think we agree
 
#735
#735
SamRebel35 said:
To say that discussing polyamory with a 4 year old isn't an attempt to talk about sex seems like trying to get by on a technicality. There is no plausible explanation for having that discussion.
Click to expand...

If they're just talking about sex, then I have problem with it. IDK why a teacher would bring this up, but teachers get asked some funny questions and I don't want it to be illegal for a teacher to offer a tiny, innocent explanation as to why some people have more than 2 parents.

I didn't know polyamorism was even a part of this debate. I live in the polygamist region of the United States and there is a huge stigma that these poor kids have to deal with. A teacher acting like it's not a big deal can have a pretty big and positive impact on those kids who feel like weirdos, I'd imagine.
 
#736
#736
RockyTop85 said:
I don’t know what’s past illiterate, I thought it stopped there, but it would make sense that there’s like a reverse literacy where you take the wrong meaning from everything you read. I didn’t realize it was a thing and that you had been diagnosed. I apologize for making fun of you for it.
Click to expand...

Watching you yell at your computer is both pathetic and hilarious.

You tell all those mean ole donkey lusting illiterates! Get em Rocky!
 
#738
#738
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst and Rickyvol77
#739
#739
Wireless1 said:
NOBODY? thanks @Franklin Pierce

'Polyamorous, Gender-Fluid, Witch' Crows About Teaching Four-Year-Olds About 'Crazy'


ce78a122-ac62-451d-b0d5-aaa58df4e56f-860x475.jpg



As the left-wing media continues to insist that untold numbers of teachers across America don’t “teach” young children about gender identity, sexuality, and other such things they have zero right to drop on our kids, “educators” who do exactly all of the above continue to come forward and admit they do.

Except preschool teacher “Lois Schwartz” doesn’t just admit it, he/she brags about doing so, including in a recent TikTok video posted to Twitter by Libs of TikTok, which scours the internet for left-wing craziness, as reported by The Post Millennial.

Man, y’all thought me teaching the children about me being poly was crazy! But, not only that, but they also know that I’m gender-fluid!

At one point last year, I had explained to them that I was not Miss Lois or Mr. Lois. It’s just Lois because I’m not a boy or girl. And this was all well and good until October, when I also explained to them that I’m pagan, so I am also a witch.
Nice touch busting out the pagan witch thing, presumably right before Halloween, don’t you think? And no way would any of this “crazy” confuse the hell out of a “normal” four-year-old growing up in a “normal” family with traditional beliefs.

Lois also bragged about how “woke” his/her students are. No kidding? A captive group of young kids being told by a teacher they presumably like that everything they’ve learned about boys and girls and moms and dads is wrong?

'Polyamorous, Gender-Fluid, Witch' Crows About Teaching Four-Year-Olds About 'Crazy'
Click to expand...
That "IT" needs to be burned at the stake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TrumpedUpVol and norrislakevol
#741
#741
VolStrom said:
Your entire focus of children and sexuality set off red flags to me. I think you have mental issues regarding children.
Click to expand...
I’m super concerned about the opinion of people who read this thread and thinks I’m focused on children and sexuality.
 
Last edited:
#744
#744
Grand Vol said:
Looks riveting...

I'll peruse it later.

Still doesn't answer the question as to why people are butthurt they can't teach sex to 2nd graders.
Click to expand...

There’s no point in trying to answer that question, but best of luck trying to find somebody to take “I didn’t read the law or anything you or anybody else has said about the law but now demand that you answer questions about my made-up version of the law” seriously.
 
#745
#745
Vol8188 said:
Watching you yell at your computer is both pathetic and hilarious.

You tell all those mean ole donkey lusting illiterates! Get em Rocky!
Click to expand...
This guy: nobody is even saying there needs to be a nanny state to protect parents from sending their kids to private schools they don’t agree with. How weird that you even bring that up.
Also this guy: I side with the people to asking if you’re a registered sex offender for saying that outlawing certain curriculum in private schools is an unnecessary nanny state.
 
#746
#746
RockyTop85 said:
This guy: nobody is even saying there needs to be a nanny state to protect parents from sending their kids to private schools they don’t agree with. How weird that you even bring that up.
Also this guy: I side with the people to asking if you’re a registered sex offender for saying that outlawing certain curriculum in private schools is an unnecessary nanny state.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what the statements of other posters have to do with your conduct. You personally attack everyone who disagrees with you, regardless.

And yes, this is still a weird hypothetical which is why you hide behind the word "if" when I called you out for it rather than attempting to argue the absurd claim.

RockyTop85 said:
If you guys are going to start advocating for the nanny state to mandate that ****** parents can’t (intentionally or unintentionally) send their kids to preschools that teach about gender fluidity or polyamorism, then can we at least dispense with the parental rights ******** and admit that this is just a different type of forced indoctrination?
Click to expand...
 
#747
#747
Definitely getting legit pedo vibes from one poster in particular in here. Arguing perversion and corruption of children with such gusto and hostility means somebody is hitting too close to home advocating against that disgusting stuff.

Millstones, millstones, where are the millstones?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, TN-POSSUM, Rickyvol77 and 5 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top