0nelilreb
Don’t ask if you don’t want the truth .
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 28,362
- Likes
- 45,464
The answer is yes and if the Chinese economy goes down they will have no problem taking us with them.Got to love that qualifier on the front of that tweet “ Based on what I know “ . Can China hold out until after Nov. 2020 ? We are going to see if they can I think . If he gets re-elected you’ll see them cave bigly .
India is ready to take their place. Big labor force there and they have a good work ethic.
It's really something how some people believe Americans are benefiting from Trump wrecking global trade.
No, they are not ready now. Neither is Vietnam, Cambodia or anyone else. They don't have the factories, infrastructure, internal transportation and shipping to take China's place. China has been building for decades to get where they are today.
No better time to start.No, they are not ready now. Neither is Vietnam, Cambodia or anyone else. They don't have the factories, infrastructure, internal transportation and shipping to take China's place. China has been building for decades to get where they are today. Presently China is the only option for meeting our supply needs.
Truth. Been searching through Asia and it's just bad. There are no other options.No, they are not ready now. Neither is Vietnam, Cambodia or anyone else. They don't have the factories, infrastructure, internal transportation and shipping to take China's place. China has been building for decades to get where they are today. Presently China is the only option for meeting our supply needs.
If your people aren't gainfully employed (as in manufacturing and thereby producing wealth) then eventually there is a problem with continuing to buy products made anywhere. Build at home, employ people at home, and you have markets for your goods at home. Henry Ford understood and did pretty well using that concept; too bad economists, business leaders, and politicians cant figure it out. But to make it work you have to trim union excesses and quit doing stupid schiff like setting the minimum wage.
You also have to revisit the way unemployment is figured to get a true picture of unemployment. Just because someone has moved off the "looking for a job" map doesn't mean that person is unemployable. The US labor pool is larger than the government admits.
If your people aren't gainfully employed (as in manufacturing and thereby producing wealth) then eventually there is a problem with continuing to buy products made anywhere. Build at home, employ people at home, and you have markets for your goods at home. Henry Ford understood and did pretty well using that concept; too bad economists, business leaders, and politicians cant figure it out. But to make it work you have to trim union excesses and quit doing stupid schiff like setting the minimum wage.
If you're following the Ford model you have to pay workers much more than today's minimum wage.
He believed the people building cars should be able to afford new cars.