The Hunter Biden Thread

[VolinWayne]

No, it won't suffice. Yes, it's been around for three years and it's been debunked for three years as well. Everybody (the US and the EU) wanted Shokin fired specifically because he wasn't investigating corruption. By Biden pressuring to have him fired, he actually made it more likely Burisma would be investigated not less likely. Talk about having your head in the sand.

Haha yeah it's been "debunked". You guys are unbelievable

 

[OrangeBoro]

Haha yeah it's been "debunked". You guys are unbelievable

Aka, they don’t care because it’s a democrat

 

[TN Ribs]

Haha yeah it's been "debunked". You guys are unbelievable

Yes, many times over. Biden was executing US policy by withholding aid - nothing more, nothing less. Facts matter.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Yes, many times over. Biden was executing US policy by withholding aid - nothing more, nothing less. Facts matter.

Post your evidence that it's been debunked. Where in the media was this debunked?
Cold TN Ribs thinks he can just say it was debunked w/out showing proof it was just BS.
LMAO .... you're a child. We're to just take this lunatic's word bc he says it's been debunked ...

 

[OrangeBoro]

Post your evidence that it's been debunked. Where in the media was this debunked?

CNN and MSNBC told him so

 

[lawgator1]

Grassley, Comer allege bribery scheme involving Biden and demand documents from FBI

Grassley: Burisma executive who allegedly paid Biden has audio recordings of conversations with Joe, Hunter

Biden has acknowledged that when he was vice president, he successfully pressured Ukraine to fire prosecutor Viktor Shokin. At the time, Shokin was investigating Burisma Holdings, and at the time, Hunter had a highly-lucrative role on the board receiving thousands of dollars per month. The then-vice president threatened to withhold $1 billion of critical U.S. aid if Shokin was not fired.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/chuck-grassley-fbi-joe-biden/2023/07/20/id/1127877/

GRASSLEY DROPS BOMBSHELL! FD-1023 Form Released, Burisma Chief 'Coerced' by Joe; Report

That does not answer my question.

Where is a link to this audio of a one billion dollar bribe?

Are you hiding now?

No.

My posts of today are directed to a very specific post itt, wherein there is a link to some poorly identified tweet claiming that audio of a phone call has been leaked (to someone, we don't know who) wherein Biden says he will pay $1 billion for the prosecutor to be fired. This is a separate and distinct claim from all of the inferences drawn from other publicly available video or audio.

I am asking for some kind of follow up. Who is behind the tweet? To whom was the audio of this call leaked? Is it available? So far, nada.

It sure seems like what is going on here is the typical GOP/MAGA screeching in an echo chamber wherein some source publishes a theory, speculation actually, of some event. It gets picked up in tweets as fact. Those tweets are re-tweeted as self-fulfilling prophecy. And when pressed, the posters (be in they in tweets or here) point back vaguely to prior iterations of the same exact thing as "new," or "bombshell," or the like.

Its just a never ending circle jerk of insulated nonsense. But it does generate clicks from the fools gullible enough to buy into it. Many of whom, I'm sad to say, clearly reside here.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

CNN and MSNBC told him so

His queen Madcow no less.

 

[TN Ribs]

Post your evidence that it's been debunked. Where in the media was this debunked?
Cold TN Ribs thinks he can just say it was debunked w/out showing proof it was just BS.
LMAO .... you're a child. We're to just take this lunatic's word bc he says it's been debunked ...

Do your own homework. You can find it in about two seconds. Hell, the IMF threatened to withhold $40B for the exact same reason.

 

[VolinWayne]

Post your evidence that it's been debunked. Where in the media was this debunked?
Cold TN Ribs thinks he can just say it was debunked w/out showing proof it was just BS.
LMAO .... you're a child. We're to just take this lunatic's word bc he says it's been debunked ...

And we all know that "debunked" basically means we don't like your evidence

 

[OrangeBoro]

Too bad Zelensky wouldn’t do something biden wanted so he would cutoff them off again

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

LMAO ..... but this has been debunked many times over & over it's all a lie from Repuplicans.

 

[TN Ribs]

LMAO ..... but this has been debunked many times over & over it's all a lie from Repuplicans.

You do know that Shokin was not not investigating Burisma at the time he got fired right. This is another simple fact that is easy to find but clearly you have no interest in facts or truth. Conspiracy theories make you feel better. Dude, you are in way too deep.

 

[whodeycin85]

You do know that Shokin was not not investigating Burisma at the time he got fired right. This is another simple fact that is easy to find but clearly you have no interest in facts or truth. Conspiracy theories make you feel better. Dude, you are in way too deep.

So the Burisma CeO is making it up, even tho there is a paper trail from the money,???

 

[VolinWayne]

That does not answer my question.

Where is a link to this audio of a one billion dollar bribe?






No.

My posts of today are directed to a very specific post itt, wherein there is a link to some poorly identified tweet claiming that audio of a phone call has been leaked (to someone, we don't know who) wherein Biden says he will pay $1 billion for the prosecutor to be fired. This is a separate and distinct claim from all of the inferences drawn from other publicly available video or audio.

I am asking for some kind of follow up. Who is behind the tweet? To whom was the audio of this call leaked? Is it available? So far, nada.

It sure seems like what is going on here is the typical GOP/MAGA screeching in an echo chamber wherein some source publishes a theory, speculation actually, of some event. It gets picked up in tweets as fact. Those tweets are re-tweeted as self-fulfilling prophecy. And when pressed, the posters (be in they in tweets or here) point back vaguely to prior iterations of the same exact thing as "new," or "bombshell," or the like.

Its just a never ending circle jerk of insulated nonsense. But it does generate clicks from the fools gullible enough to buy into it. Many of whom, I'm sad to say, clearly reside here.

Where are you coming up with "Biden says he will pay $1 billion for the prosecutor to be fired."

From the tweet
" Leaked phone conversations show VP Joe Biden leveraging a $1 billion loan for the removal of Ukraine's prosecutor general." I am pretty sure this has to do with the video I linked which you say is a different case. The only difference is the leaked call just adds evidence to what we already knew.

 

[Orangeburst]

Where are you coming up with "Biden says he will pay $1 billion for the prosecutor to be fired."

From the tweet
" Leaked phone conversations show VP Joe Biden leveraging a $1 billion loan for the removal of Ukraine's prosecutor general." I am pretty sure this has to do with the video I linked which you say is a different case. The only difference is the leaked call just adds evidence to what we already knew.

They dont care. They are pure ideologues

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

You do know that Shokin was not not investigating Burisma at the time he got fired right. This is another simple fact that is easy to find but clearly you have no interest in facts or truth. Conspiracy theories make you feel better. Dude, you are in way too deep.

Your full of hot air as usual w/your post. You still have no "linked proof" to your post showing it's debunked. lol ... we're just to take your word (a loony Dem) for it. Just you saying the subject was debunked isn't good enough. You're not very credible in your statements.

 

[C-south]

There’s more than evidence of receiving 5m from a Chinese business man who threatened that Joe would come after if he didn’t send the money. There’s bank records and text messages.

But you don’t think that’s enough to warrant an investigation?

Only fake dossiers warrant investigations.

 

[VolinWayne]

Your full of hot air as usual w/your post. You still have no "linked proof" to your post showing it's debunked. lol ... we're just to take your word for it. Just your words saying the subject being debunked isn't good enough. You're not very credible in your statements.

Oh there are articles out there that "debunk" this. They offer no proof however and it's its basically just "you must believe what we say anyway"

 

[C-south]

Yes, many times over. Biden was executing US policy by withholding aid - nothing more, nothing less. Facts matter.

Seems it was different for another guy under the same circumstances.

 

[TN Ribs]

So the Burisma CeO is making it up, even tho there is a paper trail from the money,???

Can you read? I said Shokin was not prosecuting or investigating Burisma when he got fired - this is a verifiable fact.

As for Zlochevsky, he could be lying because Congress has a transcript from 2019 where he said just the opposite:

“No one from Burisma ever had any contacts with VP Biden or people working for him during Hunter Biden’s engagement” with Burisma, Zlochevsky says in the transcript. When asked if the vice president had assisted him or his company “in any way,” Zlochevsky says no.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Oh there are articles out there that "debunk" this. They offer no proof however and it's its basically just "you must believe what we say anyway"

Corrupt Joe Biden is squeaky clean .... he didn't do nuthin illegal by getting $10 million.

 

[turbovol]

Where are you coming up with "Biden says he will pay $1 billion for the prosecutor to be fired."

From the tweet
" Leaked phone conversations show VP Joe Biden leveraging a $1 billion loan for the removal of Ukraine's prosecutor general." I am pretty sure this has to do with the video I linked which you say is a different case. The only difference is the leaked call just adds evidence to what we already knew.

Whoa. What does "leveraging a $1 billion loan" mean? A $1 billion loan to whom?

If there were /actual/ proof of Biden wrongdoing about anything, it would be a major story. There's been no actual proof of wrongdoing.
This is all another effort to smear Biden in the same way that the GOP spend two years smearing Clinton--first about Benghazi, which was a freaking
joke, and then about her emails---also a joke. She may have made a mistake about using a private server/computer for State Department business,
but the GOP spent months trying to create sinister reasons for her doing so, which was laughable. But of course the rubes lapped it all up--and let's recall in that case the FBI screwed Clinton when the Director announced--days before the election--that it was investigating Clinton's emails again,
which of course amounted to nothing but contributed heavily to her losing the election.

 

[hog88]

Whoa. What does "leveraging a $1 billion loan" mean? A $1 billion loan to whom?

If there were /actual/ proof of Biden wrongdoing about anything, it would be a major story. There's been no actual proof of wrongdoing.
This is all another effort to smear Biden in the same way that the GOP spend two years smearing Clinton--first about Benghazi, which was a freaking
joke, and then about her emails---also a joke. She may have made a mistake about using a private server/computer for State Department business,
but the GOP spent months trying to create sinister reasons for her doing so, which was laughable. But of course the rubes lapped it all up--and let's recall in that case the FBI screwed Clinton when the Director announced--days before the election--that it was investigating Clinton's emails again,
which of course amounted to nothing but contributed heavily to her losing the election.

 

[Majors]

No, it won't suffice. Yes, it's been around for three years and it's been debunked for three years as well. Everybody (the US and the EU) wanted Shokin fired specifically because he wasn't investigating corruption. By Biden pressuring to have him fired, he actually made it more likely Burisma would be investigated not less likely. Talk about having your head in the sand.

So Joe Biden in the video didn’t say what he said? Weird, video says he said what he said.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Can you read? I said Shokin was not prosecuting or investigating Burisma when he got fired - this is a verifiable fact.

As for Zlochevsky, he could be lying because Congress has a transcript from 2019 where he said just the opposite:

“No one from Burisma ever had any contacts with VP Biden or people working for him during Hunter Biden’s engagement” with Burisma, Zlochevsky says in the transcript. When asked if the vice president had assisted him or his company “in any way,” Zlochevsky says no.

Nothing but words posted again saying we should just believe what you say. No facts to back up your claim. Nothing from CNN or MSNBC or ABC backing up your talking point?