The Hunter Biden Thread

#5,954
#5,954
TheDeeble said:
It sounds to me like people believing the federal govt is working to protect Biden are suggesting they, the prosecution and defense, were hiding their intent in the "ambiguous" parts and hoped the judge would not press them on details. If pressed about fara violations publicly the prosecution did not want to admit they would be included.

I'm not a laywer so I don't know for sure. It looks suspicious to me, but I'd also have a hard time believing both sides could come to a plea agreement and not understand for over a month what was being agreed to. It was only discovered upon questioning by the judge. (if there really was no immunity shenanigans going on as has been suggested). It looks suspicious to those people that critical portions of the agreement were on a separate document separate from her purview.

From the earlier posted article:


New details emerge in Hunter Biden plea agreement

My question, if the plea agreement had gone through and a year from now the DOJ wanted to charge Hunter with FARA violations, how many hurdles would they have to jump through to get that done when Hunter's attorney's would claim he was immune from any charges regarding his dealings with Ukraine/China.

- adding these just so I or anyone else doesn't have to go back and look up the plea documents

https://www.politico.com/mwg-intern...CIgJcPGCjfDutOZyMrRx3qm9r0AxtO0EnQd7olKk4,&dl
https://www.politico.com/mwg-intern...fs8gDd8EDCnVBJSaHKU0PQBaXdbUw4qq4h9sVkKdc,&dl
Click to expand...

The whole agreement seemed like mobster like concessions associated with it with Garland playing the secret insider as the key to try to get it done.

The prosecutor and the defense was in on it. A couple of basic questions by the judge blew the whole thing to smithereens. The prosecutor then had to admit Hunter was still being investigated for FARA violations otherwise Hunter would've been subject to congressional subpoena.
 
#5,959
#5,959
HammondB3Vol said:
I got a feeling this guy is gonna be a no show.
Click to expand...

Notice the POTUS took a week off so the can assess the potential damage of Archer's testimony without having to answer questions.

So now the corrupt Biden Administration is attempting to take down Archer. Watch their lemmings try to explain this away. Each one that does deserves to be backhanded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne and AM64
#5,961
#5,961
BreatheUT said:
Notice the POTUS took a week off so the can assess the potential damage of Archer's testimony without having to answer questions.

So now the corrupt Biden Administration is attempting to take down Archer. Watch their lemmings try to explain this away. Each one that does deserves to be backhanded.
Click to expand...
I’m gonna wait until I hear Archer’s story, if we ever get to hear it……
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#5,962
#5,962
Archer will never make it to Capitol Hill. If he shows, he’ll be arrested before he’s able to enter the building. Interesting the DOJ/2nd Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated his conviction ahead of the 2020 election and is now trying to impose a report to jail date of “NOW, this very instant” knowing he’s been scheduled to appear before Congress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, davethevol and StarRaider
#5,963
#5,963
Vol737 said:
Archer will never make it to Capitol Hill. If he shows, he’ll be arrested before he’s able to enter the building. Interesting the DOJ/2nd Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated his conviction ahead of the 2020 election and is now trying to impose a report to jail date of “NOW, this very instant” knowing he’s been scheduled to appear before Congress.
Click to expand...
I don’t think he will make it to Capitol Hill either. I think he’ll take his story to the grave. It probably won’t matter; democrats would say that its not evidence of wrongdoing anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, SpaceCoastVol, davethevol and 3 others
#5,964
#5,964
Even if arrested he could still testify, just from jail or in person with cuffs and police around...happens from time to time
 
#5,973
#5,973
AM64 said:
What the IRS really needs is simplified tax code. Then it's easier not to make mistakes; of course, then it's also harder to justify/hide stuff that politicians put in the tax code to protect and repay their sleazier side of the electorate.
Click to expand...
No, that is what Americans need. The IRS needs it to be as complicated as possible in order to justify their existence and keep people under the thumb of the .gov
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, UT_Dutchman, whodeycin85 and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top