The Impeachment Thread

#3,876
#3,876
Totally normal

https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/2...rement-of-first-hand-whistleblower-knowledge/

Intel Community Secretly Gutted Requirement Of First-Hand Whistleblower Knowledge
Federal records show that the intelligence community secretly revised the formal whistleblower complaint form in August 2019 to eliminate the requirement of direct, first-hand knowledge of wrongdoing.
By Sean Davis









05242018-DUCF-ICIG-DNI.jpg



09242019-DCUG-ICIG-DNI.jpg







Sean Davis is the co-founder of The Federalist.
Photo CIA.gov
2018 Anti-Trump Coup CorruptionDirector of National IntelligenceDisclosure of Urgent Concern Donald TrumpICIG Intelligence intelligence agenciesintelligence communityIntelligence Community Inspector General LeakerMay 24 Russian collusion UkraineVolodymyr Zelensky Whistleblower
Copyright © 2019 The Federalist, a wholly independent division of FDRLST Media, All Rights Reserved.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hayezb
#3,878
#3,878

Attachments

  • 20190928_191236.jpg
    20190928_191236.jpg
    110.8 KB · Views: 4
  • 20190928_191309.jpg
    20190928_191309.jpg
    188.1 KB · Views: 5
  • 20190928_191215.jpg
    20190928_191215.jpg
    211.6 KB · Views: 4
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77 and hjeagle1vol
#3,879
#3,879
ajvol01 said:
Totally normal

https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/2...rement-of-first-hand-whistleblower-knowledge/
Click to expand...
It was revised between May of 2018 and August of 2019. Saying that it was revised in August gives the impression that it was done just in order to suit this complaint... that is obviously not the case. And it is normal. Once again, clearly this "whistleblower" was obviously privy to the content of the July 25th phone call between Trump and Zelensky. The complaint got much more right than wrong. "Hearsay", though inadmissable in a court of law, isn't always just gossip. It can sometimes be accurate. The Inspector General, Michael Atkinson, concluded in his preliminary report that the "whistleblower's" complaint was both "serious" and "credible".
 
#3,881
#3,881
BowlBrother85 said:
It was revised between May of 2018 and August of 2019. Saying that it was revised in August gives the impression that it was done just in order to suit this complaint... that is obviously not the case. And it is normal. Once again, clearly this "whistleblower" was obviously privy to the content of the July 25th phone call between Trump and Zelensky. The complaint got much more right than wrong. "Hearsay", though inadmissable in a court of law, isn't always just gossip. It can sometimes be accurate. The Inspector General, Michael Atkinson, concluded in his preliminary report that the "whistleblower's" complaint was both "serious" and "credible".
Click to expand...
Wrongo it says on the form was revised August 2019 and the CIA refused to say which date and why it was revised
 

Attachments

  • 20190928_192056.jpg
    20190928_192056.jpg
    59.6 KB · Views: 1
#3,882
#3,882
VolnJC said:
Wrongo it says on the form was revised August 2019 and the CIA refused to say which date and why it was revised
Click to expand...
It was revised between May of 2018 and August of 2019.... and either the "whistleblower's" information is accurate or not. Whoever it is, obviously had a good source. The information in that complaint was spot on.
 
#3,885
#3,885
VolnJC said:
the form itself says revised August 2019 pull it up and see for yourself
Click to expand...
I have and that is when it concluded. The revision began in May of 2018. And once again, the bottom line is that the "whistleblower's" information was accurate. The transcript of the phone call confirmed that.
 
#3,886
#3,886
BowlBrother85 said:
It was revised between May of 2018 and August of 2019. Saying that it was revised in August gives the impression that it was done just in order to suit this complaint... that is obviously not the case. And it is normal. Once again, clearly this "whistleblower" was obviously privy to the content of the July 25th phone call between Trump and Zelensky. The complaint got much more right than wrong. "Hearsay", though inadmissable in a court of law, isn't always just gossip. It can sometimes be accurate. The Inspector General, Michael Atkinson, concluded in his preliminary report that the "whistleblower's" complaint was both "serious" and "credible".
Click to expand...
The update date on the form says August 2019. Stop acting like it doesn’t. Every standard damn government form has standardized marking and revision requirements
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajvol01
#3,889
#3,889
BowlBrother85 said:
The revisions began in May of 2018. Whistleblower's info = Right as Rain.
Click to expand...
Who said that? The CIA spokesperson declined to say when it started...the date is on the form is August 2019 and the transcript also proved the whistleblower was wrong on at least 3 complaints
 

Attachments

  • whistleblower-complain-revision-1.jpg
    whistleblower-complain-revision-1.jpg
    153.9 KB · Views: 3
#3,891
#3,891
VolnJC said:
Who said that? The CIA spokesperson declined to say when it started...the date is on the form is August 2019 and the transcript also proved the whistleblower was wrong on at least 3 complaints
Click to expand...
Both "The Federalist" and "National Review" (hardly liberal outlets) have similar articles up now and they both begin with "Between May of 2018 and August of 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct first hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings." Now, let's face it... this is an attempt to discredit the messenger, because the message itself was spot on. The whistleblower, whoever it is, obviously had a source who was privy to the July 25th phone call between Trump and Zelensky. They knew that investigating the Bidens had been discussed. That wasn't just a lucky guess.

"The Federalist" article was posted by ajvol01... it is contained up above in post #3,876.
 
#3,892
#3,892
BowlBrother85 said:
Both "The Federalist" and "National Review" (hardly liberal outlets) have similar articles up now and they both begin with "Between May of 2018 and August of 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct first hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings." Now, let's face it... this is an attempt to discredit the messenger, because the message itself was spot on. The whistleblower, whoever it is, obviously had a source who was privy to the July 25th phone call between Trump and Zelensky. They knew that investigating the Bidens had been discussed. That wasn't just a lucky guess.
Click to expand...
So in July when the call was made the earlier version was in effect and they had to update it to the Aug 19 form for the complaint to be legal if you can't see that as an issue plus all the stuff he got wrong I can't help you..you are too far gone into government sheep mode
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, ajvol01 and NorthDallas40
#3,893
#3,893
VolnJC said:
So in July when the call was made the earlier version was in effect and they had to update it to the Aug 19 form for the complaint to be legal if you can't see that as an issue plus all the stuff he got wrong I can't help you..you are too far gone into government sheep mode
Click to expand...
The "whistleblower" got a hell of a lot more right than wrong.
 
#3,895
#3,895
VolnJC said:
So in July when the call was made the earlier version was in effect and they had to update it to the Aug 19 form for the complaint to be legal if you can't see that as an issue plus all the stuff he got wrong I can't help you..you are too far gone into government sheep mode
Click to expand...
It was still in effect but it was in the process of being revised... a process that had begun over a year earlier.
 
#3,898
#3,898
NorthDallas40 said:
The whistleblower got nothing right. He was a parrot. And his need to know access is in question and he needs to tell the investigators his sources. And they all need to be put under oath and questioned
Click to expand...
It has been reported that the "whistleblower" is anxious to speak to Congress. I'm sure they did disclose the sources to the Inspector General, Michael Atkinson... and once again, Atkinson concluded that the complaint was both "serious" and "credible".
 
#3,900
#3,900
BowlBrother85 said:
It has been reported that the "whistleblower" is anxious to speak to Congress. I'm sure they did disclose the sources to the Inspector General, Michael Atkinson... and once again, Atkinson concluded that the complaint was both "serious" and "credible".
Click to expand...
Good let’s get them under oath and questioned! You’re completely white washing the access aspect to this whole thing because it suits your agenda. Oh well get him at any cost!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst and VolnJC
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top