carlos86
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2011
- Messages
- 8,776
- Likes
- 6,986
Either the information is accurate or not. In retrospect, it seems pretty stupid to have released the transcript of the phone call. They didn't have to do that. But since they did, it has given the "whistleblower" credibility. Whoever it is, knew the substance of the July 25th phone call. The only explanation is that they have a source very close to Trump.Good let’s get them under oath and questioned! You’re completely white washing the access aspect to this whole thing because it suits your agenda. Oh well get him at any cost!
You’re still white washing it. Once this is over Trump needs to run quarterly black hat ops on anybody with WH access.Either the information is accurate or not. In retrospect, it seems pretty stupid to have released the transcript of the phone call. They didn't have to do that. But since they did, it has given the "whistleblower" credibility. Whoever it is, knew the substance of the July 25th phone call. The only explanation is that they have a source very close to Trump.
Exactly. That is the bottom line.What is the point of whistle blower process? Is it to generate a legally-binding indictment?
No, it's to alert the people who oversee something that there's a problem. It's up to them to take appropriate action.
The IG deemed this complaint credible. The ADNI said the whistleblower did everything according to the process.
These arguments are dumb.
What is the point of whistle blower process? Is it to generate a legally-binding indictment?
No, it's to alert the people who oversee something that there's a problem. It's up to them to take appropriate action.
The IG deemed this complaint credible. The ADNI said the whistleblower did everything according to the process.
These arguments are dumb.
And since were being sticklers for process let’s make sure the whistleblower and his sources are on the access list for all this information. You libs just keep sweeping that all under the rug. There are laws governing unauthorized access to information also! So let’s be sure to investigate all of that!What is the point of whistle blower process? Is it to generate a legally-binding indictment?
No, it's to alert the people who oversee something that there's a problem. It's up to them to take appropriate action.
The IG deemed this complaint credible. The ADNI said the whistleblower did everything according to the process.
These arguments are dumb.
Censure wouldnt appease the far left wing of the Dems..the justice Dems...AOC and her crew didn't have many friends on the hill including Pelosi but they have a huge social media following and they had successfully turned those against Nancy...even threatening to fund candidates against centrists...read up on the Congressional Black Caucus vs Justice Dems...Nancy caved to the pressure to them and imo made a huge tactical error that might give Trump a 2nd termWouldn't it be better politically for Democrats to just censure Trump, make everybody vote and then run on that next year. ?
Fact is they won’t be satisfied with anything less than impeachment. Even for a jay walking charge at this point. There is no interest in a measured response proportional to the incident. You’d think they learned from the over reaction with Clinton’s impeachment. Yet here we are about to go thru this lunacy again. They can’t get out of their own way at this point.Wouldn't it be better politically for Democrats to just censure Trump, make everybody vote and then run on that next year. ?