NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,198
- Likes
- 83,313
Yep we definitely inferred different meanings! I read it as York throwing a BS call on the whole statement chain. And again... there will be follow on interviews by both the House and the Senate so we’ll see!View attachment 228652
I think you need to read it again.
That thread is about how ICIG explained that they had to change the form because the prior form could be seen as unlawfully discouraging or prohibiting legitimate whistleblower complaints. The prior form was illegal. They had to change it. They explained this in their statement. Then ICIG blamed the illegal form on the people who were there before them.
The last sentence (“it looked fishy, but it was really okay”) was written in the voice of an ICIG, who has just explained why they changed the form.
And I really need to get some work done...