hUTch2002
Wait til next year!
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2018
- Messages
- 19,473
- Likes
- 22,245
I thought you were an attorney. If you have the evidence on your side and the burden of proof is on the other side why would you want to subject a witness to unnecessary examination? There you go making assumptions as to Trump’s reasoning again.There are two, and only two, possibilities as to the significance of Sondland's testimony and the now infamous "nothing to see here" text.
Either the text is genuine and authentic, in which case Trump would desperately want the guy to testify. He'd be ecstatic to have it happen.
Or.
The text is either not his, or was CYA and not genuine when word started to get out about what Trump was doing, in which case Trump would try to block his testimony.
Trump blocked the testimony, so ......