volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,654
- Likes
- 23,620
Setting up Trump's defense that this was all Giuliani and Sonderland run amuck?
So he didn't tell the "truth" the 1st time but the "amended" testimony is the real deal or "truth"
Lol 2.9% is pretty close to 3Are you suggesting that 2.5% is something to be proud of? Trump promised 3% last year, and he once ridiculed Obama for the same number. Every indicator shows an economy that is slowing down. We may not reach the point of a recession, but the economy is definitely cooling off.
Are you suggesting that 2.5% is something to be proud of? Trump promised 3% last year, and he once ridiculed Obama for the same number. Every indicator shows an economy that is slowing down. We may not reach the point of a recession, but the economy is definitely cooling off.
Lol 2.9% is pretty close to 3
View attachment 236190
All those words to avoid saying yes or no.
Sounds like Volker echoed the trumps defense that Ukraine didn't know military aide was being held up. If so, that's a sticky point when making the argument that it was a "this for that"...........as a request without threat of consequence is just a request (however un-American and distasteful as it may be).
My guess is that pretty soon (if they haven't already) they'll start to figure out that it's every man for himself in clown show. Unless your name starts with Tr and ends with ump, you are at real risk of being hung out to dry or being used as a patsy, I have a feeling that Giuliani thought he was a part of the family and thus an untouchable.
Compare what Trump has been able to achieve with a mature economy with what either Bernie or Warren will do. Hold on to your ass if a democrat gets elected because your but will be handed to you.Coming from the strongest economy in history with record unemployment, 3% should be a fv<king embarrassment. And you're here touting it as a feature and benefit to Trumps economic chops? gtfo.
Keep in mind that the next - or at least the end game - position of Trump and his ilk is going to be the following:
"There's nothing wrong with quid pro quo."
He might wrap it into a sentence so that it comes out something like this, but it's all the same:
"I never did quid pro quo. It was a PERFECT call. But even if I did do quid pro quo, there's nothing wrong with that."
Guaran F-ing Teed.
He should just stick with there was no quid pro quo, at least from my administration.Keep in mind that the next - or at least the end game - position of Trump and his ilk is going to be the following:
"There's nothing wrong with quid pro quo."
He might wrap it into a sentence so that it comes out something like this, but it's all the same:
"I never did quid pro quo. It was a PERFECT call. But even if I did do quid pro quo, there's nothing wrong with that."
Guaran F-ing Teed.