The Impeachment Thread

[Jxn Vol]

So hearsay whistleblower Eric Ciaramella worked for Biden. Yeah that seems legitimate.

It’s more like he was blowing whistle because he knows Ukraine is a Biden minefield.

This is going to be comical.

 

[volfanjustin]

My goodness they are a brainwashed delusional bunch...almost everything is better under Trump than Obama

just further proof they had this agenda from day 1

 

[carlos86]

 

[Mick]

They’ll wear shirts saying to do that, but they won’t do it themselves.

They just want to tell others what to do.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

They’ll wear shirts saying to do that, but they won’t do it themselves.

Yeah, like it's all chalked up in there with so many high crimes & misdemeanors.....drips off the pages.

 

[VolnJC]

So hearsay whistleblower Eric Ciaramella worked for Biden. Yeah that seems legitimate.

It’s more like he was blowing whistle because he knows Ukraine is a Biden minefield.

This is going to be comical.

Not only that..he put together the Ukraine Dossier..worked with Alex Chalupa who was instrumental in the DNC collusion to dig up dirt on Trump.. he got fired for leaking calls from the White House...he's a dirt bag

 

[carlos86]

So hearsay whistleblower Eric Ciaramella worked for Biden. Yeah that seems legitimate.

It’s more like he was blowing whistle because he knows Ukraine is a Biden minefield.

This is going to be comical.

I didn't know working in the CIA or in the NSC as an analyst or briefer equaled working directly for Joe Biden.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Not only that..he put together the Ukraine Dossier..worked with Alex Chalupa who was instrumental in the DNC collusion to dig up dirt on Trump.. he got fired for leaking calls from the White House...he's a dirt bag

Obama Administration chose nothing but the BEST traitors from the list available.

 

[Septic]

I didn't know working in the CIA or in the NSC as an analyst or briefer equaled working directly for Joe Biden.

Remember that anyone not swinging from Trumps nuts to shield him from anything negative is CLEARLY is and has always been a never-trumper progressive libtard. There are no other alternatives to this belief and anyone who says different is a never-trumper progressive libtard.

 

[Septic]

Not only that..he put together the Ukraine Dossier..worked with Alex Chalupa who was instrumental in the DNC collusion to dig up dirt on Trump.. he got fired for leaking calls from the White House...he's a dirt bag

Ukraine "Dossier" is this what we're calling the telephone memo transcript now?

I think the red hats are scared of the word "dossier".

 

[carlos86]

Not only that..he put together the Ukraine Dossier..worked with Alex Chalupa who was instrumental in the DNC collusion to dig up dirt on Trump.. he got fired for leaking calls from the White House...he's a dirt bag

LOL If you "get fired from the white house" you get fired from government altogether. The guy is still working at Langley.

 

[carlos86]

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

Remember that anyone not swinging from Trumps nuts to shield him from anything negative is CLEARLY is and has always been a never-trumper progressive libtard. There are no other alternatives to this belief and anyone who says different is a never-trumper progressive libtard.

LOL......at least we have a person in the WH that does have nuts......all your loony Dim candidates have none to swing from.........much less from the dude/dudette that was in the WH before Trump.

 

[VolnJC]

What you mean CNN was wrong saying it was against the law to say the Whistleblowers name on the Senate or house floor? What is there to hide let him testify..he can go back to hiding in Schiff's basement tight afterward

 

[VolnJC]

Key word there is think..good ole 4th hand info Taylor

 

[Septic]

LOL......at least we have a person in the WH that does have nuts......all your loony Dim candidates have none to swing from.........much less from the dude/dudette that was in the WH before Trump.

Being a carnival barking buffoon is not the same thing as being tough. Trump is a tough talking wimp whose skin is so thin you'd be able to see through it if it weren't for all the Cheeto dust. Since you brought him up, I'd wager good money that Obama could best Donny in any contest up to and including throwing hands.

 

[VolnJC]

LOL If you "get fired from the white house" you get fired from government altogether. The guy is still working at Langley.

 

[Septic]

View attachment 236359

But did he lie?

Seems like everyone is coming to the mic and corroborating what he said is accurate.

At some point you need to reconcile that Trump sht the bed and instead of wasting time trying to smear the people testifying, just focus on pointing out that the deed wasn't worthy of impeachment.

Continuing to plead innocence and then having to capitulate guilt while trashing everyone not on team trump is a short sighted strategy. Citing passages that suggest nefarious crap that start with "we've learned, allegedly..." and not citing a source is the same crap you and your ilk constantly bitch about the left doing.

 

[hog88]

What you mean CNN was wrong saying it was against the law to say the Whistleblowers name on the Senate or house floor? What is there to hide let him testify..he can go back to hiding in Schiff's basement tight afterward

I can't find any evidence that the whistleblower act prevents the disclosure of the WBs identity or protects them from having to testify.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.

 

[golfballs]

This is like a damn game of telephone and why hearsay is inadmissible.

 

[Coug]

For now the Senate republicans will back Trump but give them time because they'll eventually begin turning on Trump as the impeachment rolls along. If they try to stick with Trump until the end they will lose the Senate and they won't want to do that so they'll "suddenly" turn on Trump.

 

[tvolsfan]

I can't find any evidence that the whistleblower act prevents the disclosure of the WBs identity or protects them from having to testify.

Someone please correct me if I am wrong.

In all seriousness, what need is there for whistleblower testimony? What are republicans hoping to get that they won’t get from Sondland, Taylor, etc.?

 

[evillawyer]

In all seriousness, what need is there for whistleblower testimony? What are republicans hoping to get that they won’t get from Sondland, Taylor, etc.?

Noise. This is all about creating noise. The Republicans know how they're voting. This is just about creating confusion for the public.

 

[tvolsfan]

For now the Senate republicans will back Trump but give them time because they'll eventually begin turning on Trump as the impeachment rolls along. If they try to stick with Trump until the end they will lose the Senate and they won't want to do that so they'll "suddenly" turn on Trump.

I hope you’re right. But democrats need to remember they’re running against a cult in 2020.

 

[hog88]

For now the Senate republicans will back Trump but give them time because they'll eventually begin turning on Trump as the impeachment rolls along. If they try to stick with Trump until the end they will lose the Senate and they won't want to do that so they'll "suddenly" turn on Trump.

LOL