The JB Incident

#6
#6
  • Like
Reactions: jonnon111
#12
#12
Good luck and good bye to JB.
Overrated at every position he ever played. Not saying he was bad, but the plays he didn't make (becauzse he was out of position and undisciplined in his decision making) are what cost us the 21 Ole Miss game, so we are even.
Lets not pretend Rattlor beat us that night because we were missing JBs stellar coverage skills.

Wish hum the best, but CJH didn't suspend him because of something insignificant. Remember he even had to earn his way back on to a CJP coached team full of cheating coaches, so he was always a wild card.
 
#16
#16
Good luck and good bye to JB.
Overrated at every position he ever played. Not saying he was bad, but the plays he didn't make (becauzse he was out of position and undisciplined in his decision making) are what cost us the 21 Ole Miss game, so we are even.
Lets not pretend Rattlor beat us that night because we were missing JBs stellar coverage skills.

Wish hum the best, but CJH didn't suspend him because of something insignificant. Remember he even had to earn his way back on to a CJP coached team full of cheating coaches, so he was always a wild card.
Overrated? LMFAO! Tell me you don't know jack about football without telling me. He'll be playing on Sunday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GetYouSomeofThat
#17
#17
Hmm.. there may be more to the story? We will probably never really know
There was an incident between he and Hooker. Heupel chose sides, instead of handling the issue fairly like a coach should. The defense saw what went down and was mad their guy got suspended and Hooker didn't.
 
#18
#18
if i was the GM, i would want some ownership. I think its safe to assume Heup didn’t punish a player for no reason. His denial only reinforces the perception that he is not accountable.

I think JB will be like a 7th round special teamer for someone risky / dumb. Probably the Cleveland Browns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JarFly and onevol74
#21
#21
if i was the GM, i would want some ownership. I think its safe to assume Heup didn’t punish a player for no reason. His denial only reinforces the perception that he is not accountable.
No, he punished one but not the other, when both were wrong.
 
#23
#23
There was an incident between he and Hooker. Heupel chose sides, instead of handling the issue fairly like a coach should. The defense saw what went down and was mad their guy got suspended and Hooker didn't.
Dear God! We did not lose this game because he was not on the field and the defense felt slighted by Heupel. NOBODY played well!!! Except for SC. Watch the game again
 
#24
#24
The USC loss was due to a player thinking he was bigger than the team. Unfortunately UT has experienced attitudes like that too many times.
Well maybe he was??

I mean without him they did absolutely smash us...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MT_Vol

VN Store



Back
Top