gatorhater_35
vn guru in waiting
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2007
- Messages
- 664
- Likes
- 0
During his Heisman-winning junior year, he made an acrobatic one-handed sideline interception against the Michigan State Spartans. Woodson had two interceptions in the game.[6] In a game against Ohio State, he returned a punt for a touchdown, made an interception in the end-zone, and had a 37-yard reception that led to Michigan's only offensive touchdown of the game. The win lifted Michigan to the Rose Bowl.[7]
Manning was great, but the voters, for once, had a shot at voting in a defensive player, and they did. It wasn't a total travisty.
Except for the fact that:
1) A large chunk of Heisman votes were in before Ohio State played Michigan
2) Woodson in 97 was nowhere close to Champ Bailey in 98 (who got no Heisman talk)
3) Woodson was nowhere to be found in Heisman talk until there was less than a month left in the season, and
4) The media snobs refused to believe that quality football existed in the SEC
then yes, your post is accurate. The fact that Woodson's interception got the hype that it did is lunacy, although probably not any more than Lavar Arrington jumping over the center and being talked about as a "great player" as a result.
That is really my point as well. Troy Smith was not the best player in college football last year. Darren McFadden was. Darren McFadden is the best player in college football again this year, but because of Arkansas' record, he will likely get shafted.
The Heisman winner, more often than not, has been the MVP on a team that goes undefeated or plays for the National Championship. The precedent says that it is the best player that plays for the team with the best record.
it did not pretty well validate anything. the award has nothing to do with a pro career, otherwise it would be awarded retroactively. In such case, many of the winners over the past 20 years would have been called to send it back.Paul Hornung's pro career pretty well validated his Heisman. He did play on a very poor college team.