The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#4,082
#4,082
BowlBrother85 said:
It is how Trump was taught to speak, by a mafia lawyer, when he is attempting to coerce others to commit crimes on his behalf.
Click to expand...

And AGAIN how is that a crime? Also Theres the part where he was “allegedly “taught this by a Mafia lawyer. If this was a guy claiming to have taught this to Chuck Schumer you would talk about what a crook he was and how he couldn’t be trusted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#4,083
#4,083
BowlBrother85 said:
It is heavily implied .... Raffensperger understood what Trump was asking him to do, and he considered the call to be threatening in nature.
Click to expand...

I don’t know where you live but I’m assuming it’s not Georgia. Raffensperger is a weasel with a charm level somewhere above Eric Swallwell and less than Dick Cheney. In what way did he feel threatened? That an outgoing President was going to crush him politically. Trump tried to destroy Thomas Massie and Massie won 85% of his primary. Nobody is scared of Trump. But a little **** like Raff would claim that he is to get some media attention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, AM64 and whodeycin85
#4,084
#4,084
Vol8188 said:
Who wanted someone to look into voter fraud? I’m okay with that.
Click to expand...
You would not pretend to be this naive if it concerned a Democrat either.

1) During the phone call, Raffensperger tells Trump that he has ALREADY investigated each of the allegations of fraud, which Trump is alluding to, and there was no validity to any of them, including his allegations against Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. Trump tells Raffensperger that thousands of dead people voted. Raffensperger corrects him by saying that it was only 4.

2) If Trump only cared about uncovering fraud, he would not have been so specific about how many votes he needed to be "found". It was 11,780. This was not a random number either, as Trump even acknowledges. It was what he needed to win. That was the purpose of the phone call; not fraud ... but overturning the outcome of the election.
 
#4,085
#4,085
sonofUT62 said:
I don’t know where you live but I’m assuming it’s not Georgia. Raffensperger is a weasel with a charm level somewhere above Eric Swallwell and less than Dick Cheney.
Click to expand...
You are speaking those words out of political tribalism. Raffensperger wouldn't play ball. That is why you don't like him.

He was easily re-elected in November, by the way. So, it would seem that not everyone in the state of Georgia agrees with you.
 
#4,087
#4,087
BowlBrother85 said:
You would not pretend to be this naive if it concerned a Democrat either.

1) During the phone call, Raffensperger tells Trump that he has ALREADY investigated each of the allegations of fraud, which Trump is alluding to, and there was no validity to any of them, including his allegations against Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss. Trump tells Raffensperger that thousands of dead people voted. Raffensperger corrects him by saying that it was only 4.

2) If Trump only cared about uncovering fraud, he would not have been so specific about how many votes he needed to be "found". It was 11,780. This was not a random number either, as Trump even acknowledges. It was what he needed to win. That was the purpose of the phone call; not fraud ... but overturning the outcome of the election.
Click to expand...

Again .... redundance clearly made. You like to type all that out over & over?
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85 and AM64
#4,088
#4,088
BowlBrother85 said:
You are speaking those words out of political tribalism. Raffensperger wouldn't play ball. That is why you don't like him.

He was easily re-elected in November, by the way. So, it would seem that not everyone in the state of Georgia agrees with you.
Click to expand...

There’s zero political tribalism. And I could care less if he played ball.
I’m a registered Member of a 3rd party and am pretty open about my hatred for Trump. But Brad the Brat is no better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#4,094
#4,094
hUTch2002 said:
True but I’m not trying to “wash away the stain” of how you view things. How you think about something is up to you. I accept you and I have different views and, if the chips were down and you and I had to run this country, I’m sure we could find a way to make it work. The way you’re coming across is that my thinking is broken and must be eradicated.
Click to expand...
Fair enough. I agree, I think you and I could compromise and work through our differences because you do not view me as the enemy who is intent on destroying the America that we both know and love. There are many on here who claim I, and others like me, are the enemy, are trying to destroy the country, and need to be defeated. Those are the stains I'm attempting to remove.

Full disclosure: just got back form Sweetwater Brewery.....comedy night on the first and third Thursday of each month, and I've had about three to many.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002
#4,098
#4,098
Vol8188 said:
I’ve posted them 3 times now. Go ahead. What’s the “threat”
Click to expand...
"And you are going to find that they are - which is totally illegal, it is more illegal for you than it is for them because, you know what they did and you're not reporting it. That's a criminal, that's a criminal offense. And you can't let that happen. That's a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer. And that's a big risk."

Do you not understand what Trump is saying?
"You can't let that happen."
"It is more illegal for you than it is for them."
"That's a big risk to you and your lawyer. And that's a big risk.'
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top