The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

Wow... for the 3rd time, friend... you're not paying attention. Time to step aside.



If the point is being missed (for the third time), friend - maybe you aren't making it very clear.

Was it the "fact" of you suggesting that there was collusion between all the corrupt federal judges? Were you clearing up your point by trying to deflect to hunters laptop?

Do a better job of presenting your position, otherwise I'll keep carving you up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
If the point is being missed (for the third time), friend - maybe you aren't making it very clear.

Was it the "fact" of you suggesting that there was collusion between all the corrupt federal judges? Were you clearing up your point by trying to deflect to hunters laptop?

Do a better job of presenting your position, otherwise I'll keep carving you up.

I already have. Take care, bro.
 
I already have. Take care, bro.

Your dodging the question is noted, friend.

dodge-the-matrix.gif
 
I can absolutely say that there is no legally verified evidence of widespread election fraud.....
You cannot assume this without audits being done. Going to court should have never been necessary...do the audits for they are the only way to tell if fraud took place. If Biden got 81 million legit votes as Dems claim then Dems should have no fear of audit....but they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
You cannot assume this without audits being done. Going to court should have never been necessary...do the audits for they are the only way to tell if fraud took place. If Biden got 81 million legit votes as Dems claim then Dems should have no fear of audit....but they do.

I don't have to assume. You are the one leveling the claims of fraud, it's up to you to support the claim with legally verified and recognized evidence. Until you present that, your claim is just that, a claim.

The fact that there has been three years of "claims" and zero verifiable evidence of widespread voter fraud makes me assume there isn't any.

Since you've planted your flag here - aren't you excited about Donny asking for a speedy trial so he can out all of the evidence he has and prove the world wrong before the election?
 
Like I said in the previous post here, you guys don't accept fact based as evidence. So asking anyone to "prove" anything is simply a different way for you to say "nu uh."

You deplorables are about to be in for a rude awakening when you discover that trumps winning on Twitter doesn't equate to winning a tial based on evidence and facts.

I will enjoy my seat right here on the first row. I'll be the one pointing and laughing.

Most of us have problems with fictional fact based fact. And in the last few year the amount of fictional fact has grown significantly. Five or so ago the DOJ and FBI were making a career of investigating fictional fact ... looks like they still are. Funny thing: when the fictional fact became an embarrassment some of it oddly disappeared, phones wiped themselves, phones and computers died; it was like a biblical electronic plague.
 
Most of us have problems with fictional fact based fact. And in the last few year the amount of fictional fact has grown significantly. Five or so ago the DOJ and FBI were making a career of investigating fictional fact ... looks like they still are. Funny thing: when the fictional fact became an embarrassment some of it oddly disappeared, phones wiped themselves, phones and computers died; it was like a biblical electronic plague.
Lots of people believe "fictional fact based fact." From pee tape people to Ferrari driving SKITL server kraken people.
 
Lots of people believe "fictional fact based fact." From pee tape people to Ferrari driving SKITL server kraken people.

Considering the 81M (allegedly) I probably should have said many of us have a problem with fictional fact based fact; or probably many rational people have a problem with fictional fact based fact.
 
JD FOSTER: This Proves That Trump’s Prosecutors Are Playing Politics, And It Has Nothing To Do With His Charges

"If Trump were willing (I heard this notion so it’s not original with me), then he should change his mind and tear up the bail agreement. Show up, be arrested, and then be taken to jail. The Secret Service would immediately invoke their federal authority and force the county to empty out the jail to ensure the former President’s safety. Then watch the thousands, then tens of thousands, then more and more come to the jail to protest. Even MSNBC would be forced to cover it."

"Or, more likely, watch the Court and Willis squeak like little mice and say, never mind, Mr. Trump. See you in a few weeks. There would be plenty of embarrassment, but not for Trump."

"This is in no way a defense of Donald Trump. It is yet another indictment of our justice system run amok in political mud. And it is a call to American jurists to remember that the rule of law only prevails when lady justice holds the scales, blindfold securely in place. If the jurists who know best won’t police the system, then those who know far less will, and then we really will want a blindfold."
 
I don't have to assume. You are the one leveling the claims of fraud, it's up to you to support the claim with legally verified and recognized evidence. Until you present that, your claim is just that, a claim.

The fact that there has been three years of "claims" and zero verifiable evidence of widespread voter fraud makes me assume there isn't any.

Since you've planted your flag here - aren't you excited about Donny asking for a speedy trial so he can out all of the evidence he has and prove the world wrong before the election?
Without audits to PROVE results then you are assuming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Without audits to PROVE results then you are assuming.

Unfortunately there's no way to do an audit because of the way mail in ballots are done. Once the outer envelope is thrown away, you can no longer verify it. If you were going to design a way to cheat and cover you're tracks, you'd do it exactly the way our country does it.
 
If you believe J6 was an insurrection but don't believe that church was a major fire.... Then your a hypocrite
I just told you the facts, again you have a choice to believe a pastor's account vs Trump's account. Pretty obvious that you can't accept reality and you have chosen wrong once again. Or maybe the Pastor lied.
 
I just told you the facts, again you have a choice to believe a pastor's account vs Trump's account. Pretty obvious that you can't accept reality and you have chosen wrong once again. Or maybe the Pastor lied.
The pastor stated it was a fired that destroy led the nursery and there was smoke and water damage to the rest...I can't find an exact number but easily 50k in damage...so not a small amount of damaged it the fact is political people exaggerate in order to gain favor...when the Dems do it your over there getting off more then EL...when Trump does it you act like he personally insulted your family honor...your a hypocrite plain and simple. That's the facts
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Unfortunately there's no way to do an audit because of the way mail in ballots are done. Once the outer envelope is thrown away, you can no longer verify it. If you were going to design a way to cheat and cover you're tracks, you'd do it exactly the way our country does it.
elections are supposed to be done in a way where they can be audited. Any election in any state/district that cannot be audited then those votes should be thrown out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and jwilliams
The pastor stated it was a fired that destroy led the nursery and there was smoke and water damage to the rest...I can't find an exact number but easily 50k in damage...so not a small amount of damaged it the fact is political people exaggerate in order to gain favor...when the Dems do it your over there getting off more then EL...when Trump does it you act like he personally insulted your family honor...your a hypocrite plain and simple. That's the facts
Did the Pastor state that it was Fire Bombed? Trump stated it was?
Nice name calling, you have no idea. Tough guy.
You got into the conversation late as well but the Original Church was the upside down Bible and the Photo OP which was used. Not damaged at all.
All you cultist do is fine one incident completely unrelated to the conversation and blow it up like Chicken Littles through misdirection.
Sorry as well for you because you show that you are a product of your own environment.
 

VN Store



Back
Top