The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

[Sea Ray]

Lack of a decent alternative is why he won.

Being the least smelly piece of sh*t doesn't change the fact that it's still sh*t.

My guess is that you'd call any viable candidate a smelly fish. What if it was DeSantis? Greg Abbott? Mayor Pete? My guess is no one is wonderful enough to satisfy you

 

[Orangeslice13]

How is deregulation short sighted and unsustainable?

In and of itself it’s not.
The previous application was.

 

[Orangeslice13]

My guess is that you'd call any viable candidate a smelly fish. What if it was DeSantis? Greg Abbott? Mayor Pete? My guess is no one is wonderful enough to satisfy you

It’s every election.
The best person doesn’t exist. The person who won only did so because the other side ran a bad candidate

 

[TheDirector]

Trump can become the first in history to lose the popular vote 3 times. If the trend remains constant, Trump will lose by 9 million votes in '24.

Come on guys. Move away from Trump. He's poison.

Anyone heard from this guy in a while?

 

[utvolpj]

Anyone heard from this guy in a while?

If you're truly interested you could just click their username and find out

 

[Septic]

My guess is that you'd call any viable candidate a smelly fish. What if it was DeSantis? Greg Abbott? Mayor Pete? My guess is no one is wonderful enough to satisfy you

I was on record as supporting and willing to vote for Nikki Haley.

 

[Sea Ray]

I was on record as supporting and willing to vote for Nikki Haley.

She lost my vote when she suggested getting registered with the federal gov't before being able to access the internet

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[jmacvols1]

 

[OHvol40]

How is this benefitting the public?

 

[jmacvols1]

How is this benefitting the public?

we don't need corrupt people in public office. Law suits brought against Trump were corrupt with no merit but brought to "get Trump".

We don't need corrupt people involved in lawfare against the public.

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

I was on record as supporting and willing to vote for Nikki Haley.

I wasn't just willing, I did vote for her in the Tennessee primary. It was a lost cause. Nevertheless, she was probably the best candidate of the whole bunch, either side

 

[OHvol40]

we don't need corrupt people in public office. Law suits brought against Trump were corrupt with no merit but brought to "get Trump".

We don't need corrupt people involved in lawfare against the public.

It was a rhetorical question. It doesn’t benefit anyone but Trump.

 

[jmacvols1]

It was a rhetorical question. It doesn’t benefit anyone but Trump.

I think it will benefit the Rep candidate in the next Presidential election. If these corrupt people in the DOJ were successful in removing Trump off the ballet then the DOJ then controls who the Rep can run for President. If Trump Jr runs, then they go after him and remove him off the ballet. If any leftist in the DOJ dislike who the Reps run for President, then they will go after them with lawfare.

It benefits the Reps while hurting the Dems and their unlawful lawfare against Reps.

 

[jmacvols1]

 

[Orangeburst]

Lawfare..now time for the pain.

 

[Orangeburst]

we ever see the IG interview with Biden?
freakin prosecuting Trump while having classified docs in his garage.
cant make this up..

 

[StarRaider]

 

[StarRaider]

 

[NCFisher]

How is this benefitting the public?

By getting rid of those with no regard for rule of law, including the ones who "were just doing my job" instead of upholding their oath. That part about defending the Constitution is real.

How can that not benefit the public?

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Jack Smith, Former Special Counsel Who Investigated Trump, Raises Eyebrows By Disclosing $140K 'Gift'​

Former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith accepted $140,000 worth of free legal services in the last weeks before he resigned.

Smith ran two criminal investigations into Donald Trump, both of which were dropped after his election victory, as a sitting president can't be prosecuted.

Smith resigned on January 10 after Trump boasted he would fire Smith 'within two seconds' of taking office if he won the election.

Before he stepped down, Smith retained outside counsel from Peter Koski at Covington & Burling - the biggest law firm in Washington DC.

Smith's final public disclosure report included the pro bono legal services under the gifts and travel reimbursements section.



Why Smith needed outside counsel is unclear, but he retained Koski, himself a former DoJ official, amid Trump's escalating rhetoric against political enemies.

Donald Trump nemesis Jack Smith discloses $140K 'gift'

Jack ran two criminal investigations into Donald Trump, both of which were dropped after his election victory as a sitting president can't be prosecuted.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

The grift continues

 

[Sgt_Nick_Fury]

Jack Smith, Former Special Counsel Who Investigated Trump, Raises Eyebrows By Disclosing $140K 'Gift'​

Former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith accepted $140,000 worth of free legal services in the last weeks before he resigned.

Smith ran two criminal investigations into Donald Trump, both of which were dropped after his election victory, as a sitting president can't be prosecuted.

Smith resigned on January 10 after Trump boasted he would fire Smith 'within two seconds' of taking office if he won the election.

Before he stepped down, Smith retained outside counsel from Peter Koski at Covington & Burling - the biggest law firm in Washington DC.

Smith's final public disclosure report included the pro bono legal services under the gifts and travel reimbursements section.

View attachment 722448

Why Smith needed outside counsel is unclear, but he retained Koski, himself a former DoJ official, amid Trump's escalating rhetoric against political enemies.

Donald Trump nemesis Jack Smith discloses $140K 'gift'

Jack ran two criminal investigations into Donald Trump, both of which were dropped after his election victory as a sitting president can't be prosecuted.

www.dailymail.co.uk

That doesn't seem legal somehow, does that seem legal, to get paid personal gifts to prosecute someone? I think there's a name for that.