Orangeslice13
Shema Yisrael
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 94,621
- Likes
- 108,711
Everybody should be concerned about voter fraud to a point. Once the processes are investigated and the numbers when found do not change the results, then there is a time to let it go. In Trump's case, it appears he went overboard and still has not let it go. Give him GA and it does not change the final outcome, but it will continue to be an issue. Integrity and reasoning are the questions, you would not give your 10 year old child a loaded weapon to play with just because they said so. Would you?You seem to be arguing in favor of Trump looking at possible voter fraud in GA in 2020, no?
Everybody should be concerned about voter fraud to a point. Once the processes are investigated and the numbers when found do not change the results, then there is a time to let it go. In Trump's case, it appears he went overboard and still has not let it go. Give him GA and it does not change the final outcome, but it will continue to be an issue. Integrity is what the question is and you would not give your 10 year old child a loaded weapon to play with just because they said so. Would you?
I understand. Reminds of the man banging his head against the wall and thinking he is successful because he thinks he is winning because the wall is bleeding. You hand him a mirror and he looks into it and still does not realize the blood is from his head. He continues to bang away.You are talking to a brick.
They've been investigating him for years. Right or wrong, that's the truth. If his announcement should trump the pursuit of justice, how does that argue against my hypothetical about simply remaining a perennial candidate?He had already announced and it is leading by a landslide in polls. Your example doesnt hold weights.
As for him pardoning himself, I dont think he can from State charges in GA. Either way, which is more important, him winning the race and gaining pardon power or the election being interfered with by prosecuting the leading opposition to the one currently in power.
Perhaps. But if it were done anywhere else in the world, we would strongly denounce an elected leader refusing to acknowledge the results of the democratic process and trying to derail the peaceful transition of power.If this was being done anywhere else in the world, America would would strongly denounce that Country.
They've been investigating him for years. Right or wrong, that's the truth. If his announcement should trump the pursuit of justice, how does that argue against my hypothetical about simply remaining a perennial candidate?
lol....You didn't see me say anything about it.I am sure J6ers held without bail would have loved their proceedings expedited but I didnt see you calling for it.
I would use different descriptors for each of those presidents but I get what you are saying. I'm not sure how we could change the process. Ultimately it is on the voter and the primaries are where we have to do better.Trump is marketing through and through ... the kind that believes there is no bad press. The one thing I'll agree with you about is that is no way to be a president. Reagan was an actor - looked like a good president. Carter was a buffoon; incompetent but acted like a nice guy. One Bush put on a good professional front but was relatively inept; the other looked like a clown out of position and inept. Clinton was a carnival barker - all charm and all con. Obama was the great divider - pandered to one group to the expense of the nation. Biden is just a fool, and that's all he'll ever be ... and that's ignoring the really bad qualities. The sad part is the electorate accepts this and doesn't demand more; the really sad part is that politicians keep the electorate divided, and an electorate divided can't demand better ... they just take the swill slopped on the plate.
lol....You didn't see me say anything about it.
I believe the discussion here is about the proceedings interfering with the election. As far as I know, there were no J6ers being held who were running for office.