The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#11,902
#11,902
Boston Vol said:
Well Mick, let me help you out. You keep using the word “convicted” for a civil trial. There are no convictions in civil court.
Click to expand...

He lost the case, Earl. How's that? The jury found against him, and the judge affirmed that he "raped" her.

You and the rest of MAGA would do well to stop embarrassing yourselves and accept the reality of the gangster.

Mountains of evidence in multiple cases and incidents over many, many years that the man is a con man and vicious liar, a rampant lawbreaker,
corrupt to the bone, antidemocratic, a serious mental case and all-around horrible human being....and MAGA are like: "The Dems claimed
that he didn't brush his teeth on the morning of Jan. 6 and that may be wrong!"
 
#11,903
#11,903
whodeycin85 said:
How many time Rudd triumphs policy get overturned by three SCOTUS fur being unconstitutional??? Biden has had several, but he supports it??
Click to expand...
you are drifting from the original conversation. Can you prove that Trump will not attempt to flip the Constitution on it's backside? There is enough there to state he will...
 
#11,905
#11,905
Sudden Impact said:
you are drifting from the original conversation. Can you prove that Trump will not attempt to flip the Constitution on it's backside? There is enough there to state he will...
Click to expand...
can you prove he did or will do?? So far there is nothing that hasn't been attempted and leglly done before, and I'm referring the the election because that is your go to....you brought up that Biden supported the constitution considering he has tried to circumvent it several times only to be shot down and UNCONSTITUTIONAL seems the exact opposite of supporting it....
 
#11,906
#11,906
whodeycin85 said:
can you prove he did or will do?? So far there is nothing that hasn't been attempted and leglly done before, and I'm referring the the election because that is your go to....you brought up that Biden supported the constitution considering he has tried to circumvent it several times only to be shot down and UNCONSTITUTIONAL seems the exact opposite of supporting it....
Click to expand...
Difference in an Amendment vs a complete disregard. I guess you are ok with an aristocracy or a dictatorship. Trumps Goal. He needs to be create a climate that serves not divides. if narcissistic behavior is your thing go for it.
 
Last edited:
#11,907
#11,907
Sudden Impact said:
Produce it, but like you stated doesn't make any difference. She did some major damage
Click to expand...
It was refuted with hours of her testimony by the SS.... but MSM barely claim it's a campaign to discredit her even though she wasn't present when it supposed to have happened...even the driver discredited... but truth didn't matter after a lie had run through our society
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#11,908
#11,908
whodeycin85 said:
It was refuted with hours of her testimony by the SS.... but MSM barely claim it's a campaign to discredit her even though she wasn't present when it supposed to have happened...even the driver discredited... but truth didn't matter after a lie had run through our society
Click to expand...
Sworn Testimony? no, had the opportunity but refused...pictures came out as well....you have a selective memory
 
#11,911
#11,911
Sudden Impact said:
Difference in an Amendment vs a complete disregard. I guess you are ok with an aristocracy or a dictatorship. Trumps Goal. He needs to be create a climate that serves not divides. if narcissistic behavior is your thing go for it.
Click to expand...
What did he do???? You still have not mentioned anything while I've pointed out Bidens unconstitutional policies....not to mention his current role with Hunter....student loans executive order is not a amendment..btw ruled unconstitutional..In case you were unsure
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#11,914
#11,914
whodeycin85 said:
According to NBC she was under oath..meaning sworn testimony...


Hutchinson stands by all of the testimony she provided yesterday, under oath
Click to expand...
She was under oath...SS at first refused and denied it. Pictures came out and one Engle? confirmed what she stated
 
#11,915
#11,915
turbovol said:
He lost the case, Earl. How's that? The jury found against him, and the judge affirmed that he "raped" her.

You and the rest of MAGA would do well to stop embarrassing yourselves and accept the reality of the gangster.

Mountains of evidence in multiple cases and incidents over many, many years that the man is a con man and vicious liar, a rampant lawbreaker,
corrupt to the bone, antidemocratic, a serious mental case and all-around horrible human being....and MAGA are like: "The Dems claimed
that he didn't brush his teeth on the morning of Jan. 6 and that may be wrong!"
Click to expand...
You think I’m maga? I would never vote for Donald Trump under any circumstances. I just find it ironic that you continually insult other people’s intelligence when you don’t know the difference between being convicted and being found liable. Hopefully the helps you out Earl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GordonC and volfanhill
#11,918
#11,918
turbovol said:
He just got convicted of sexual abuse in the Jean Carroll case. More to come....

Jury finds Donald Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation in E. Jean Carroll case​

By Maureen Chowdhury, Tori B. Powell, Mike Hayes and Elise Hammond, CNN
Updated 10:00 p.m. ET, May 9, 2023
Click to expand...

You need to learn the differences and stop making yourself look stupid.
 
#11,921
#11,921
Sudden Impact said:
Do your own research? You are the one that does not know Or needs proof. Google is your friend…
Click to expand...
Funny i googled it and all.i can find is where she refers to trump being in the "beast"....when he in the SUV...also SS specifically came out an said he didn't grabbed for the wheel...both people involved were disposed, but the committee didn't have them testify during the hearing..if they collaborated her story they would have....the fact you can't point to a link..shows me tour just repeating what MSM is telling..smh
 
#11,922
#11,922
turbovol said:
Migrators? They're called migrants. Anyone who applies for asylum at our border has to be processed. That's our system. Most asylum requests are denied, but certainly not all. You do realize that if we didn't accept immigrants into America we'd have virtually no workers in 40 years?
Click to expand...

Yeah, about those huge lines millions long headed back south across the border.
 
#11,923
#11,923
turbovol said:
Migrators? They're called migrants. Anyone who applies for asylum at our border has to be processed. That's our system. Most asylum requests are denied, but certainly not all. You do realize that if we didn't accept immigrants into America we'd have virtually no workers in 40 years?
Click to expand...

That’s fine. Apply for asylum, while staying in Mexico until the matter is resolved
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top