The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

Migrators? They're called migrants. Anyone who applies for asylum at our border has to be processed. That's our system. Most asylum requests are denied, but certainly not all. You do realize that if we didn't accept immigrants into America we'd have virtually no workers in 40 years?

No one has an issue with asylum seekers or immigrants utilizing the proper channels. It's the hordes of unchecked illegal immigrants that are flooding across the border.

These sanctuary cities are going to learn the hard way what fiscal responsibility means when they go broke trying to take care of these folks.

The government owes its tax paying citizens a secure border, at a minimum. I don't remember voting on allowing illegal immigrants to use taxpayer funded goods and services and until it's voted on by the electorate and approved - it ought to be considered theft. Biden and the Dem leaders of these sanctuary cities are idiots for allowing this.
 
No one has an issue with asylum seekers or immigrants utilizing the proper channels. It's the hordes of unchecked illegal immigrants that are flooding across the border.

These sanctuary cities are going to learn the hard way what fiscal responsibility means when they go broke trying to take care of these folks.

The government owes its tax paying citizens a secure border, at a minimum. I don't remember voting on allowing illegal immigrants to use taxpayer funded goods and services and until it's voted on by the electorate and approved - it ought to be considered theft. Biden and the Dem leaders of these sanctuary cities are idiots for allowing this.

They're not flooding across the border. The people who've been sent to various cities around the country were legally processed at the border.
 
They're not flooding across the border. The people who've been sent to various cities around the country were legally processed at the border.

Legally processed can't work until asylum is granted. They are a huge burden on the cities they squat in and taxpayers shouldn't be forced to eat the cost.

They are flooding across the border.


140,000 in the first 20 days of this month. An average of almost 7,000 a day.
 
Taxpayers $$$$ is the bottom line. Schools, medical insurance premiums, housing, jails, prisons and policing in general. The list goes on and on. Drugs and Income Taxes. We seem to penalize the US Systems and Corporations by allowing them to come into our country.
Instead of letting them drain our system, build airports at the borders, take their information and fly them immediately back to their country of origin. Give them a telephone number and take their contact information. Tell them you will contact them when they can enter the country. This would be better than flying them to NY & FL.

Tell them if they show up the second time. They will be automatically denied. They are draining our resources and if you fly them back to the start point immediately then it is much cheaper than allowing them into the US
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol and AM64
No one has an issue with asylum seekers or immigrants utilizing the proper channels. It's the hordes of unchecked illegal immigrants that are flooding across the border.

These sanctuary cities are going to learn the hard way what fiscal responsibility means when they go broke trying to take care of these folks.

The government owes its tax paying citizens a secure border, at a minimum. I don't remember voting on allowing illegal immigrants to use taxpayer funded goods and services and until it's voted on by the electorate and approved - it ought to be considered theft. Biden and the Dem leaders of these sanctuary cities are idiots for allowing this.
This^. And there is a difference between SECURE and CLOSED.
 
Legally processed can't work until asylum is granted. They are a huge burden on the cities they squat in and taxpayers shouldn't be forced to eat the cost.

They are flooding across the border.


140,000 in the first 20 days of this month. An average of almost 7,000 a day.

If they're apprehended then they are not "flooding across the border." The fact that they are being caught puts the lie to the assertion
that the border is "open" when, in fact, the border is secure.

Has migration become a problem? Are they too many migrants at the
border. Yes and yes. Are new solutions needed? Perhaps. It is comprehensive problem for not just the U.S. but European countries as well.
But the U.S. border is most definitely not open.
 
I always get a kick out of dumbfounded Republicans like Marsha Blackburn who recently complained about a bunch of illegal immigrants getting caught crossing the border with drugs. We apprehend the criminals and she's bitching about it on Twitter, for no other reason than to stir up fear in her dumbed downed supporters. She knows better
 
  • Like
Reactions: lostsheep

Fani Willis Made a Serious Error in Donald Trump Case: Legal Analyst​

The Georgia indictment of Donald Trump is completely unnecessary and only adds to claims of a Democratic Party "pile on", a former prosecutor and legal analyst has said.

Elie Honig was reacting to the indictment of Trump by Fani Willis, a Democrat and the elected District Attorney for Fulton County, Atlanta.

Honig said that Trump has already faced a federal indictment for allegedly attempting to steal the 2020 election and that the indictment covers seven states, including Georgia.

Honig is the author of Hatchet Man, a ferocious attack on Trump's former attorney general, Bill Barr, and has been a frequent critic of the former president.


Speaking on the legal podcast, "Cafe", Honig said the Georgia charges are "unnecessary and, if anything, lend fuel to Trump's claims...that this is just a Democratic Party pile on."

Honig said that Department of Justice federal attorney Jack Smith has already charged Trump with an "effort to steal the election nationwide and in seven states in particular, including Georgia.

"So why is [the Atlanta indictment] in the greater good and why is it promoting public confidence in the fairness of this [process] to have one of those seven state prosecutors pile on with a charge of her own? I don't think it serves any greater good," he said.

He claimed it was a partisan indictment by Willis.

 

Donald Trump suing ex-MI6 spy Christopher Steele at High Court​

The former US president is bringing a data protection claim against Mr Steele and his company Orbis Business Intelligence.​



750M would be about correct
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
RICO charges for all. Glad to see the splc attorney charged. Maybe the splc should label themselves as a hate organization? Thoughts?

They used to do good but have been off the rails for quite a while.
 
Huh, Trump Judge Chutkan is a lying scumbag....who would have guessed it. If she would lie about something so easy to prove, what wont she do in this trial to ensure the verdict she wants? Welcome to DC Courts.


IT'z ALl RiGgEd!

Trump is always the victim.

Laughing Hehe GIF - Laughing Laugh Hehe - Discover & Share GIFs
 
  • Like
Reactions: lostsheep
Republicans against Trump

@RpsAgainstTrump
·
4h

General Mark Milley, the outgoing chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff SLAMS Trump in his retirement speech:“We don't take an oath to a king, or queen, or a tyrant or a dictator. And we don't take an oath to a wannabe dictator…”


Everybody who has ever worked for the gangster hates the man and knows he's a dangerous lowlife. When the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs verbally disembowels somebody, you know he's vile and unAmerican.
 
So he now has a reason to appeal under ineffective counsel. I'm no lawyer but that's my initial reaction
I don't know if that would fly. This is hardly a public defender-type situation and he'd also probably have to show they didn't discuss it.
 
Habba Dabba Do sighting! one benefit of all these legalities for Trump
 
Last edited:
He certainly has ineffective counsel if his lawyer(s) approved this statement. This coming right after learning that it's a bench trial.

Very stable genius.

 
He certainly has ineffective counsel if his lawyer(s) approved this statement. This coming right after learning that it's a bench trial.

Very stable genius.



Certainly an interesting strategy. Sh*t on the judge in every case and then try and claim there was bias in the verdict and sentence.

Can't wait to see how this plays out.
 
Certainly an interesting strategy. Sh*t on the judge in every case and then try and claim there was bias in the verdict and sentence.
He's used to crying and the GOP in Congress coming to his rescue. Not happening this time.
 
He certainly has ineffective counsel if his lawyer(s) approved this statement. This coming right after learning that it's a bench trial.

Very stable genius.


His lawyers are definitely a mixed bag. The fact he's had a number of lawyers leave his counsel is indicative of his unwillingness to follow their advice. No President EVER has had as much turnover with administrators and legal counsel. It's amazing his followers are either ignorant of this irrefutable fact, OR, they emphatically rationalize it in some whataboutism manner
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sudden Impact
He's used to crying and the GOP in Congress coming to his rescue. Not happening this time.

He must think that the court of public opinion is going trump an actual court ruling, that's the only thing I can come up with.

Working on that quintuple- undermine the media, undermine the government, undermine law enforcement, undermine the electorate and undermine the judiciary.

ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED: DICTATORSHIP - everyone and anything that can hold you accountable is labeled as "RIGGED."
 
I don't know if that would fly. This is hardly a public defender-type situation and he'd also probably have to show they didn't discuss it.
I think he's got a case


Alina Habba, one of the attorneys representing Trump in the case, said Trump wanted a jury in the case.

"I know my client did want a jury, and we did want that," she said.

She did not explain why they did not ask for one.
 

VN Store



Back
Top