evillawyer
Kung Fu Kamala, B*tches!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 31,876
- Likes
- 21,087
Actually is applied to his time in office which is where the immunity effects...basically he cant be held responsible for activities during his presidency that people may not like...the question is does his action regarding the election fall under that....my guess is the SCOTUS will decide if it's not thrown out by thenThere is no such thing as “presidential immunity” in the constitution. It is only DOJ policy that states that the sitting president cannot be indicted while in office. But that doesn’t apply after the president leaves office.
So if a sitting pres murders someone on live TV on the white house lawn before the end of his term he can't ever be prosecuted for it?Actually is applied to his time in office which is where the immunity effects...basically he cant be held responsible for activities during his presidency that people may not like...the question is does his action regarding the election fall under that....my guess is the SCOTUS will decide if it's not thrown out by then
I believe it for things done in purview of his job...other wise Obama and Bush could be tried for the murder of Americans overseas...your smart enough to understand the difference..Trumps argument is that he was acting under his purview to challenge the election results....if I'm understanding it correctly..now given this far it hasn't been placed in criminal charges only civil...we will have to seeSo if a sitting pres murders someone on live TV on the white house lawn before the end of his term he can't ever be prosecuted for it?
Yea but Jenna is a tearful Christian who would have never done this if she had done her due diligence .Another guilty plea this morning. That's three. And each is obligated to filly cooperate against Trump. To tell the truth abiut his lies, his efforts to undermine the election results.
Trump's goose is cooked. He won't plea because he can't bring himself to do so. And when he gets convicted, .... man, that is going to be one ugly day for the GOP.
Wouldn't challenging election results fall within his purview as a candidate and not as the president?I believe it for things done in purview of his job...other wise Obama and Bush could be tried for the murder of Americans overseas...your smart enough to understand the difference..Trumps argument is that he was acting under his purview to challenge the election results....if I'm understanding it correctly..now given this far it hasn't been placed in criminal charges only civil...we will have to see