The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

It is very apparent that many of you forgot your Civics from high school. I blame the 17th amendment for this.

The Connecticut compromise set up our bicameral Congress since the founders could not agree on whether the people or the states should have the ability to make the laws. One part is supposed to represent the people (House) while the other represents the states (Senate). The House numbers for each state would be determined by the Census and reapportioned based on the population. The Senate would always consist of 2 senators from each state that were appointed by the State legislatures. This was done to show that all states were equal. This compromise was mirrored in the Electoral college.

The 17th Amendment (1913) changed how this works. We no longer allow the State legislatures to appoint Senators. It was claimed there was too much corruption in the States to allow this to continue and that it would be better for the people to pick the Senators. You could argue that this change was needed at the time, but it could also be argued that the corruption is worse now when it comes to the popular election of Senators.

In the 100+ years since the amendment, most Americans do not realize how much power was taken away from the States by this one amendment. We only see the Federal government as this all-powerful body that rules over the States. This was never the intent of the founders.

The idea that someone's vote counts more than someone else's vote based on the State they live in is ridiculous. It shows you have no knowledge of how our country was created and designed. If you want to get rid of the Electoral College than you are in essence in favor of getting rid of all States and just having one centralized Federal Government. No State governments would be needed any longer as we would no longer be independent states joined together by a constitution. Instead of doing something so ridiculous, maybe we should repeal the 17th Amendment so the Americans can actually understand how our government was designed and how it is supposed to work.
 
it's not BS, but it is becoming is irrelevant. The city populations will soon overwhelm the rest of the country, and what will be more relevant will be getting that demographic to vote for you. The politicians won't give a **** what the country folk want or need.

Should "country folk" have more or less pull than cities (aka where people live)?
 
It is very apparent that many of you forgot your Civics from high school. I blame the 17th amendment for this.

The Connecticut compromise set up our bicameral Congress since the founders could not agree on whether the people or the states should have the ability to make the laws. One part is supposed to represent the people (House) while the other represents the states (Senate). The House numbers for each state would be determined by the Census and reapportioned based on the population. The Senate would always consist of 2 senators from each state that were appointed by the State legislatures. This was done to show that all states were equal. This compromise was mirrored in the Electoral college.

The 17th Amendment (1913) changed how this works. We no longer allow the State legislatures to appoint Senators. It was claimed there was too much corruption in the States to allow this to continue and that it would be better for the people to pick the Senators. You could argue that this change was needed at the time, but it could also be argued that the corruption is worse now when it comes to the popular election of Senators.

In the 100+ years since the amendment, most Americans do not realize how much power was taken away from the States by this one amendment. We only see the Federal government as this all-powerful body that rules over the States. This was never the intent of the founders.

The idea that someone's vote counts more than someone else's vote based on the State they live in is ridiculous. It shows you have no knowledge of how our country was created and designed. If you want to get rid of the Electoral College than you are in essence in favor of getting rid of all States and just having one centralized Federal Government. No State governments would be needed any longer as we would no longer be independent states joined together by a constitution. Instead of doing something so ridiculous, maybe we should repeal the 17th Amendment so the Americans can actually understand how our government was designed and how it is supposed to work.

Woodrow Wilson is considered one of the worst POTUS in history.
 

Trump Prosecutors Release Jury Screening Questions Ahead Of Landmark Trial​


A New York Court hearing former President Donald Trump’s upcoming hush money trial released questions for prospective jurors Monday.

The questions delve into various aspects of the jurors’ lives, notably their affiliations with groups either in support of or opposition to groups such as the QAnon movement, Proud Boys, Oathkeepers, Three Percenters, Boogaloo Boys, and Antifa are highlighted. Furthermore, the court asked about their views on a former president facing criminal charges in state court and their opinions regarding Trump’s treatment in the criminal case.

The questions included in the questionnaire included media consumption habits and social media preferences.

 

Trump Prosecutors Release Jury Screening Questions Ahead Of Landmark Trial​


A New York Court hearing former President Donald Trump’s upcoming hush money trial released questions for prospective jurors Monday.

The questions delve into various aspects of the jurors’ lives, notably their affiliations with groups either in support of or opposition to groups such as the QAnon movement, Proud Boys, Oathkeepers, Three Percenters, Boogaloo Boys, and Antifa are highlighted. Furthermore, the court asked about their views on a former president facing criminal charges in state court and their opinions regarding Trump’s treatment in the criminal case.

The questions included in the questionnaire included media consumption habits and social media preferences.



You realize that these are not automatically asked, right ?
 
That in no way answers the point that two EC votes for each Senator warps the value of votes by persons within those states and gives people living in less populous states more of a say in who is POTUS than people in more populous states.

It is a permanent distortion of the math, premised upon a tremendously different set of concerns 230 years ago than exist today.
That’s because (surprise, I know) Senators do not represent “the people” - they represent “the states”.

And all States are equal. Bummer, I know…

California’s overwhelming advantage in population is reflected in its 52 other EC votes.

California - 52
Wyoming - 1

Just shocking that you believe a system that would just hand every presidential election to the Democrats as “more modern, more fair”. Shocked, I tell ya.
 
Now I could support something like that. Just not a fan of a new system that completely upends the apple cart and puts either party at a distinct advantage

1712636803016.png

With the current model, the last 10 presidential elections are split.

Democrats - 5
Republicans - 5

I’m not in favor of any new model that tips it 8-2…
 
That’s because (surprise, I know) Senators do not represent “the people” - they represent “the states”.

And all States are equal. Bummer, I know…

California’s overwhelming advantage in population is reflected in its 52 other EC votes.

California - 52
Wyoming - 1

Just shocking that you believe a system that would just hand every presidential election to the Democrats as “more modern, more fair”. Shocked, I tell ya.


And that does not answer why we use Senate seats NOW to determine EC votes. It's a complete artifice whose justification ended well over a century ago.
 
The concept of a Republic is an artifice of a bygone era, that is no longer justified?
It just comes with the arrogance of the modern leftist. They know better than the idiots that came before them.

I mean, Ben Franklin couldn’t even use Google! Print media?? That’s for dirt people. No no. The 1st amendment is outdated because we have hate speech now. The 2nd amendment is no longer needed because our police force, the one we are constantly trying to defund, have plenty of guns to protect us. In fact, we should just let AI create a new constitution for us based on our current needs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77
It just comes with the arrogance of the modern leftist. They know better than the idiots that came before them.

I mean, Ben Franklin couldn’t even use Google! Print media?? That’s for dirt people. No no. The 1st amendment is outdated because we have hate speech now. The 2nd amendment is no longer needed because our police force, the one we are constantly trying to defund, have plenty of guns to protect us. In fact, we should just let AI create a new constitution for us based on our current needs.
There was plenty of hate speech at the time of the founding when the BoR was crafted.
The rate of dissemination has simply increased.

We also had firearms at the time the BoR was crafted.
The rate of fire has simply increased.

If the Founders could not have envisioned the advancements in firearms, surely they could not have foreseen the advancements in communications. 🤔
 

VN Store



Back
Top