The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

Not trying to pick on you, my man. I know the PF is kind of a "fellowship of the kindred a-holes to each other," which is why I rarely post here, but I thought your post neutral and agreeable enough for me to respond to with my thoughts.

I guess it is at some level, semantics. I don't think I would use your word, "accepted," because I take that to mean passive acquiescence even in the face of injustice. I do think "followed" sums up my feelings, because we can follow a bad law or bad outcome while still not "accepting" it and while we work to change the mechanisms that caused what we believe to be an unjust outcome.

I think the common ground we share here is agreement that there has to be a system of rules, and there has to be a broad societal consensus that we will abide by those rules, even if the result is (or is simply perceived to be) unfair, unjust or unequitable, otherwise there will be anarchy. These rules have to be followed by all, and where there are flaws in the rules, we should all acknowledge them and work to remediate those flaws without regard for who is the "winner" and who is the "loser." Unfortunately, because of a lust for power, it is easier for politicians to weaponize whatever rules lead to outcomes they want than it is to actually work for the common good of all. In a nation split 52-48 on virtually every issue, that kind of tribalism, real or perceived, will ultimately lead to vengeance, disunity, and destruction.

Cheers,

RW
Precisely. Well done. Most get too hung up in the semantics to realize maybe their views aren’t that different after all. You didn’t.

Sorry, let me be a little more “PF” for you.

You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about but that’s no surprise as you’re clearly a “insert name here” worshipper and a horrible person just like your idol “repeat name here”.

Now you feel like you had a true foray into the PF. Cheers back Ritz!
 
Precisely. Well done. Most get too hung up in the semantics to realize maybe their views aren’t that different after all. You didn’t.

Sorry, let me be a little more “PF” for you.

You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about but that’s no surprise as you’re clearly a “insert name here” worshipper and a horrible person just like your idol “repeat name here”.

Now you feel like you had a true foray into the PF. Cheers back Ritz!
Oh dear, I will have to take my thinned-skin self back to the baseball forum now!! 🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad and hUTch2002
The Dems are not quite in Stalin’s league yet. Let’s see if Trump makes it to the election alive.

More MAGA nonsense.....People who think the gangster is being treated unfairly clearly are not very bright---or just choose to ignore the facts that daily drop on their little heads like anvils.
 
More MAGA nonsense.....People who think the gangster is being treated unfairly clearly are not very bright---or just choose to ignore the facts that daily drop on their little heads like anvils.
lol. When the latest show trial verdict is overturned on appeal I fully expect your agreement with the decision.
 
T

Turrible I say. It's just as amazing as the dems hypocrisy.
They both are running neck in neck race to the bottom.
True. but the MAGAs are winning that race. Because they're following their blindfolded flight leader in a crash dive straight to the ground. Being the liar he is, he's claiming engine failure rather than his donning a blindfold.
 

"Hunter Biden, of course, is entitled, as was Donald Trump, to the presumption of innocence and to a trial by a jury of his peers," Jeffries said during an appearance on NBC’s "Meet the Press."

Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens

"Hunter Biden, of course, is entitled, as was Donald Trump, to the presumption of innocence and to a trial by a jury of his peers," Jeffries said during an appearance on NBC’s "Meet the Press."

Lol.
Delay it until after Puddinhead is out of office. Then that scumbag won't have daddy's pardon in his pocket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens

"Hunter Biden, of course, is entitled, as was Donald Trump, to the presumption of innocence and to a trial by a jury of his peers," Jeffries said during an appearance on NBC’s "Meet the Press."

Lol.

Hunter, much like Trump, would be guilty/not guilty depending on the venue. In a politically motivated case, a jury of your peers isnt a jury full of people who voted against you (or your father in Hunter's case).
 
Hunter, much like Trump, would be guilty/not guilty depending on the venue. In a politically motivated case, a jury of your peers isnt a jury full of people who voted against you (or your father in Hunter's case).
Anything short of jail time for Hunter will be fuel for the Trump campaign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
Biden wants to tax capital gains at 50%. Let that sink in and think what that is going to do to the stock market. But that only affects hedge fund traders, right?
Biden leads the country to civil war similar to trump. Itll take a third option to spare us from the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune at this point. Both of the top ticket candidates are poison pills.
 
Delay it until after Puddinhead is out of office. Then that scumbag won't have daddy's pardon in his pocket.
A President can proactively issue a pardon before a conviction like Ford famously did for Nixon. Expect a full pardon for Hunter to be Biden’s last official act before leaving the Oval Office in January 2025
 

VN Store



Back
Top