hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,605
- Likes
- 162,867
Well this is interesting Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute
The judge noted a president could destroy any record he wanted during his tenure and his only responsibility was to inform the Archives.
As to whether records a president concluded were personal can be forcibly seized after he leaves office, the court concluded it was unreasonable to force NARA to go get the tapes
"Because the audiotapes are not physically in the government's possession, defendant submits that it would be required to seize them directly from President Clinton in order to assume custody and control over them," Jackson noted. "Defendant considers this to be an 'extraordinary request' that is unfounded, contrary to the PRA's express terms, and contrary to traditional principles of administrative law. The Court agrees."
You have a warped sense of emotionality and justice. I worked as a prosecutor for years. Do you think I hated everyone I prosecuted? I don't hate Trump despite his being a dirt bag. He just deserves his punishment.Yeah... it is. LOL.
But keep telling yourself it isn't either when it is clearly both.
You have a warped sense of emotionality and justice. I worked as a prosecutor for years. Do you think I hated everyone I prosecuted? I don't hate Trump despite his being a dirt bag. He just deserves his punishment.
Well well now, curiouser and curiouser eh? FBI Unit Leading Mar-a-Lago Probe Earlier Ran Discredited Trump-Russia Investigation
The FBI division overseeing the investigation of former President Trump's handling of classified material at his Mar-a-Lago residence is also a focus of Special Counsel John Durham's investigation of the bureau's alleged abuses of power and political bias during its years-long Russiagate probe of Trump.
The FBI's nine-hour, 30-agent raid of the former president's Florida estate is part of a counterintelligence case run out of Washington – not Miami, as has been widely reported – according to FBI case documents and sources with knowledge of the matter. The bureau's counterintelligence division led the 2016-2017 Russia "collusion" investigation of Trump, codenamed "Crossfire Hurricane."
Although the former head of Crossfire Hurricane, Peter Strzok, was fired after the disclosure of his vitriolic anti-Trump tweets, several members of his team remain working in the counterintelligence unit, the sources say, even though they are under active investigation by both Durham and the bureau's disciplinary arm, the Office of Professional Responsibility. The FBI declined to respond to questions about any role they may be taking in the Mar-a-Lago case.
This was all about 1/6 and finding something, anything to pin the riot on Trump. I’ll bet the house that this is another case of the FBI lying to another judge to obtain a warrant.
Well well now, curiouser and curiouser eh? FBI Unit Leading Mar-a-Lago Probe Earlier Ran Discredited Trump-Russia Investigation
The FBI division overseeing the investigation of former President Trump's handling of classified material at his Mar-a-Lago residence is also a focus of Special Counsel John Durham's investigation of the bureau's alleged abuses of power and political bias during its years-long Russiagate probe of Trump.
The FBI's nine-hour, 30-agent raid of the former president's Florida estate is part of a counterintelligence case run out of Washington – not Miami, as has been widely reported – according to FBI case documents and sources with knowledge of the matter. The bureau's counterintelligence division led the 2016-2017 Russia "collusion" investigation of Trump, codenamed "Crossfire Hurricane."
Although the former head of Crossfire Hurricane, Peter Strzok, was fired after the disclosure of his vitriolic anti-Trump tweets, several members of his team remain working in the counterintelligence unit, the sources say, even though they are under active investigation by both Durham and the bureau's disciplinary arm, the Office of Professional Responsibility. The FBI declined to respond to questions about any role they may be taking in the Mar-a-Lago case.
Not against Donald Trump personally, no .... but he is required to testify against Trump's real estate company, and his deal can be voided if he doesn't answer truthfully. Also, Weisselberg won't be sentenced until after the trial.He is not testifying against Trump