The (many) indictments of Donald Trump

#2,451
#2,451
lawgator1 said:
Question for Trumpsters: Let's assume you are right and the subjective motivation for the charges is political. Does that mean that Trump did not break the law or should not be held accountable if he did?
Click to expand...

If Trump broke the law, similar cases were prosecuted in the same way, and there was no issues with statute of limitations, then I'd be OK with it...
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85, BowlBrother85 and sonofUT62
#2,453
#2,453
sonofUT62 said:
So why has this been passed on twice? And also he didnt break tax laws or someone besides Bragg would be prosecuting him. He obviously did bad things, probably illegal. The prosecution isn’t the problem. It’s the fact that it’s blatantly being done for political benefit and no one is fooled. I detest Trump and would love to see him in Handcuffs. Can you honestly say that Biden hasn’t done anything that rises to the level of an indictable offense? Your hypocrisy is blatant.
Click to expand...
New York City does have an income tax so Bragg could prosecute that if those were the charges...
 
  • Like
Reactions: sonofUT62
#2,459
#2,459
evillawyer said:
Nothing more divisive than providing healthcare and drama free governance while black. The nerve of that guy to do those things while black.
Click to expand...

Other than being a race baiter, sending Mexicans guns to kill Americans, promote terrorism, make healthcare even more insanely expensive for those that work, etc he did alright…..he was a train wreck simply protected by the color of his skin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, UT_Dutchman, AM64 and 1 other person
#2,461
#2,461
hog88 said:
I'm going to say that this is a case of creative interpretation of the law to gain an indictment and no he didn't break the law.
Click to expand...
All 30 counts? Creative interpretation?
One of Trump's key mottos "if you're not breaking the law, you're not playing to win." (He got that one from Stone)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hunerwadel
#2,462
#2,462
ClearwaterVol said:
Jeez. It is amazing to watch people struggle to defend their cult leaders of crimes. Both sides.
Click to expand...

Joe Biden has plenty more cult followers instead of trump. The Biden Crime Family is the hot topic of the day but the media covers it up daily .... but you know this already. So, you defend your cult leader as well. It is amazing, I agree.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, UT_Dutchman and AM64
#2,463
#2,463
C-south said:
Other than being a race baiter, sending Mexicans guns to kill Americans, promote terrorism, make healthcare even more insanely expensive for those that work, etc he did alright…..he was a train wreck simply protected by the color of his skin.
Click to expand...
That post could stand is the prime example of the negative consequences of rightwing propaganda.

None of what you say is true, yet you believe it is absolutely true....all because you have been brainwashed.
 
#2,469
#2,469
lawgator1 said:
Question for Trumpsters: Let's assume you are right and the subjective motivation for the charges is political. Does that mean that Trump did not break the law or should not be held accountable if he did?
Click to expand...
I'm not a Trumper but this is a stretch. That's especially true given what NYC has shown in their pursuit of actual violent criminals. It's not about the law or safety it's a political game to get their name on the record. It's a cop working a speeding ticket while the bank nearby is being robbed and hostages shot. Sure they're both technically criminal acts but prioritize your work
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, AM64, NCFisher and 1 other person
#2,471
#2,471
lawgator1 said:
Question for Trumpsters: Let's assume you are right and the subjective motivation for the charges is political. Does that mean that Trump did not break the law or should not be held accountable if he did?
Click to expand...

Not a Trumpster but:

if the motivation for the charges is political then charges should not be brought. simple as that.

I would argue that the state abusing it's judicial power for political means is a worse scenario than a bookkeeping misdemeanor. Likewise, not bringing charges when they should be brought due to political motivation is bad scenario. The most important issue is blind justice. When it is not blind we have a much bigger problem than one individual's wrongdoing.

absent political motivation, if one (anyone including Trump) breaks the law they should be held accountable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, AM64, Gandalf and 1 other person
#2,475
#2,475
volinbham said:
Not a Trumpster but:

if the motivation for the charges is political then charges should not be brought. simple as that.

I would argue that the state abusing it's judicial power for political means is a worse scenario than a bookkeeping misdemeanor. Likewise, not bringing charges when they should be brought due to political motivation is bad scenario. The most important issue is blind justice. When it is not blind we have a much bigger problem than one individual's wrongdoing.

absent political motivation, if one (anyone including Trump) breaks the law they should be held accountable.
Click to expand...

But who decides what the motivation is? Did a crime or crimes happen? An independent grand jury thought so. Why should those crimes go unpunished? Because Trump says it’s political? What if the DA were a Republican? Would it still be political?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top