The Ministry of Truth thread

Or better known as Biden's Disinformation Board with DHS.

Anyone want to give me any reason this is a good idea?

It is unAmerican for Joe Biden to be able to read Joe Biden's approval ratings so those things must be censored. It would more than likely give him another stroke, rendering him even more useless so that is why it is a good idea. It's for the good of the nation!
 
The MSM is fake news , they lie for party instead of just reporting the facts . Always a spin . 🤷‍♂️
Not all mainstream media outlets are the same. It's not fair to lump NPR, ABC News, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Christian Science Monitor with CNN, MSNBC and Axios.

... and as for the "they lie for Party instead of just reporting the facts" and the "always a spin" critique? Of course, you can say the same thing about right-wing outlets such as Fox News, The Washington Times, Newsmax, One America News and The New York Post. The right should either offer a neutral alternative or shut the hell up about the biased coverage of politics. Their own outlets are not any more objective than the ones from the left that they complain about.
 
That's funny.

But you can already see people in this thread saying the facts surrounding this can never be trusted. And it's the beauty of the typical right wing vague conspiracy approach, #1A: "proof of the conspiracy? No, but that is itself proof because the conspiracy is hiding the proof."

An unassailable, never ending circle that allows you to cling to whatever conspiracy is popular today and to feel good about the fact that you can't demonstrate any of it.
Not conspiracy theory as much as a simple question. Do you believe the government when they say things like that they are NOT spying on you? If you do, great, run along on your trusting and comfortable little sheep path. Some of us however are a bit more sceptical and cynical.
By the way, did you ever hear of n individual named Julian Assange? Asking for a friend
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
First, yes, he said he could have offered better information at the time. I thought that kind of candor would be what you want. An admission he should have done a better job.

Second, you are YET AGAIN making enormous assumptions, the most glaring of which is that the panel has the power to do anything past ordering in lunch for a working meeting.
Let me ask you, YET AGAIN - Will this “board” be issuing “guidance”? (Updates, Reports, Alerts, whatever).

Or are you intentionally ducking this question?
 
It is unAmerican for Joe Biden to be able to read Joe Biden's approval ratings so those things must be censored. It would more than likely give him another stroke, rendering him even more useless so that is why it is a good idea. It's for the good of the nation!
LOL. Biden doesn't care about his approval ratings. Only politicians who plan to run for re-election care about them. It is very unlikely that Biden runs again.

Now, Trump cared about his approval ratings. He cared a lot... and he would always call his approval ratings "fake news" or "voter suppression polls" if they were below 50%. That is true even though his percentage of the popular vote was in line with his approval ratings.
 
Well if Mayorkas said it then it must be true. He never lies. It's interesting that he said they hadn't explained the purpose of the board well enough and then didn't offer any further explanation. But as you noted earlier, let's see what they have in mind.
Everything coming out of this POS administration is a lie. I dont believe 1 dam# word that any of these morons say.
 
Not all mainstream media outlets are the same. It's not fair to lump NPR, ABC News, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Christian Science Monitor with CNN, MSNBC and Axios.

... and as for the "they lie for Party instead of just reporting the facts" and the "always a spin" critique? Of course, you can say the same thing about right-wing outlets such as Fox News, The Washington Times, Newsmax, One America News and The New York Post. The right should either offer a neutral alternative or shut the hell up about the biased coverage of politics. Their own outlets are not any more objective than the ones from the left that they complain about.

Didn’t I say MSM ? You always have to put but but but the right or Trump on everything
 
LOL. Biden doesn't care about his approval ratings. Only politicians who plan to run for re-election care about them. It is very unlikely that Biden runs again.

Now, Trump cared about his approval ratings. He cared a lot... and he would always call his approval ratings "fake news" or "voter suppression polls" if they were below 50%. That is true even though his percentage of the popular vote was in line with his approval ratings.

Is it even possible for you to post anything without a "buuut Trump"?
 
LOL. Biden doesn't care about his approval ratings. Only politicians who plan to run for re-election care about them. It is very unlikely that Biden runs again.

Now, Trump cared about his approval ratings. He cared a lot... and he would always call his approval ratings "fake news" or "voter suppression polls" if they were below 50%. That is true even though his percentage of the popular vote was in line with his approval ratings.

Ummm....... President Biden lashes out just as bad if not worse than Trump. Saying he doesn't care about approval ratings is probably just wishful thinking on your part.
 
Ummm....... President Biden lashes out just as bad if not worse than Trump. Saying he doesn't care about approval ratings is probably just wishful thinking on your part.
That is absolutely ridiculous. I just ran searches of "Joe Biden discusses his approval ratings" and "Joe Biden complains about his approval polling" and got nothing. If you do the same thing for Trump, you get page after page of links... mostly concerning Trump's tweets.

... and I stand by what I said .... Biden won't run in 2024. That has never been the plan.
 

VN Store



Back
Top