The Official “Regular Posters of the Basketball Forum” Thread

#1,154
#1,154
The Dog said:
U Don't agree ? Not because she lost to Missouri at home, just because she sucks
Click to expand...

Nope. There are far more credible women's basketball programs across the country today than there were when Pat Summitt was running the program. The SEC wasn't nearly as deep during Pat's era. Andy Freaking Landers at Georgia was the biggest competition. Mississippi State and USC were non-existant. Geno was still washing uniforms after UConn's games until Pat's last few years.

Holly is recruiting very well. Anybody would struggle in the current environment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aWhiteLoftonChism
#1,155
#1,155
Thunder Good-Oil said:
Nope. There are far more credible women's basketball programs across the country today than there were when Pat Summitt was running the program. The SEC wasn't nearly as deep during Pat's era. Andy Freaking Landers at Georgia was the biggest competition. Mississippi State and USC were non-existant. Geno was still washing uniforms after UConn's games until Pat's last few years.

Holly is recruiting very well. Anybody would struggle in the current environment.
Click to expand...
TGO, we are going to have to agree to disagree on this one.
 
#1,156
#1,156
Thunder Good-Oil said:
Nope. There are far more credible women's basketball programs across the country today than there were when Pat Summitt was running the program. The SEC wasn't nearly as deep during Pat's era. Andy Freaking Landers at Georgia was the biggest competition. Mississippi State and USC were non-existant. Geno was still washing uniforms after UConn's games until Pat's last few years.

Holly is recruiting very well. Anybody would struggle in the current environment.
Click to expand...
Let me clarify, TGO, I agree with everything u posted, but the last sentence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cardvolfan
#1,157
#1,157
She hardly sucks. TN is still highly ranked. She has multiple championships. She's done all that while having to fight her boss over stripping away the Lady Vol brand and shutting down a stand alone athletic department. She's not Pat Summitt. Only Geno can say that.
 
#1,158
#1,158
And she's won almost 75% of her games. That puts her in the elite of all UT coaches. It's higher than Phil Fulmer's and every men's basketball coach at UT except for Clevenger 100 years ago and Mauer in the 1940s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aWhiteLoftonChism
#1,159
#1,159
Thunder Good-Oil said:
She hardly sucks. TN is still highly ranked. She has multiple championships. She's done all that while having to fight her boss over stripping away the Lady Vol brand and shutting down a stand alone athletic department. She's not Pat Summitt. Only Geno can say that.
Click to expand...
Sucks was too strong of a word. I think she was the good cop to Pat's bad cop and the mentality has held her back. Kinda like Wade Houston's relationship with Louisville's Denny Crum. No where near that bad, but they have a lot similarities. Great recruiters but have that assistant coach mentality (yes, bad posting, used the same word twice in this post), which I don't think Holly can overcome. It's virtually impossible to replace a legend, especially one with 8 NCs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cardvolfan
#1,160
#1,160
The Dog said:
Sucks was too strong of a word. I think she was the good cop to Pat's bad cop and the mentality has held her back. Kinda like Wade Houston's relationship with Louisville's Denny Crum. No where near that bad, but they have a lot similarities. Great recruiters but have that assistant coach mentality (yes, bad posting, used the same word twice in this post), which I don't think Holly can overcome. It's virtually impossible to replace a legend, especially one with 8 NCs.
Click to expand...

LV fans are spoiled. If Holly gets run, things will get worse for them.
 
#1,161
#1,161
Thunder Good-Oil said:
LV fans are spoiled. If Holly gets run, things will get worse for them.
Click to expand...
They are and not if UT spends the money. By far, the most attractive job that could possibly have a coaching vacancy. But, this is the wrong thread to discuss this, anymore. I'm done and I'm agreeing to disagree
 
  • Like
Reactions: cardvolfan
#1,162
#1,162
Pat also didn't face the Title IX challenges that Holly has working against her. It was laughable for a women's coach to earn more than $100k during Pat's tenure. Now many are making a million a year or more. It's a far more competitive environment. Firing Holly would wreck the program much like what happened to the men after Dickey blew out Devoe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aWhiteLoftonChism
#1,163
#1,163
Thunder Good-Oil said:
LV fans are spoiled. If Holly gets run, things will get worse for them.[/QUOTE
]
giphy.gif
Click to expand...
 
#1,164
#1,164

The glory years are in the rear view mirror. No high level established coach will take on the challenge of following Summitt, even a decade later, and hiring a young up and comer that is successful is a long shot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aWhiteLoftonChism
#1,165
#1,165
Thunder Good-Oil said:
The glory years are in the rear view mirror. No high level established coach will take on the challenge of following Summitt, even a decade later, and hiring a young up and comer that is successful is a long shot.
Click to expand...
Better chance there than football.
 
#1,171
#1,171
Thunder Good-Oil said:
Nope. There are far more credible women's basketball programs across the country today than there were when Pat Summitt was running the program. The SEC wasn't nearly as deep during Pat's era. Andy Freaking Landers at Georgia was the biggest competition. Mississippi State and USC were non-existant. Geno was still washing uniforms after UConn's games until Pat's last few years.

Holly is recruiting very well. Anybody would struggle in the current environment.
Click to expand...
Anybody named Holly would struggle. Anybody named Kara would come in and make a DRASTIC difference in year one!
 
#1,172
#1,172
cardvolfan said:
Anybody named Holly would struggle. Anybody named Kara would come in and make a DRASTIC difference in year one!
Click to expand...

Holly has won 75% of her games. Has Kara ever coached a single game?

The Lady Vols will never approach the success they had under Pat. They're lucky to still be consistently ranked and pulling off a couple of huge wins every year. Replacing Holly isn't going to make any of that better. The best scenario is for Holly to coach several more years, keep up the outstanding recruiting, and then retire and stay connected to the program. There are only 2 or 3 coaches that would make the program better and they're certainly not going to put their careers at risk to be the head ball coach for the LVs.
 
#1,173
#1,173
Thunder Good-Oil said:
Holly has won 75% of her games. Has Kara ever coached a single game?

The Lady Vols will never approach the success they had under Pat. They're lucky to still be consistently ranked and pulling off a couple of huge wins every year. Replacing Holly isn't going to make any of that better. The best scenario is for Holly to coach several more years, keep up the outstanding recruiting, and then retire and stay connected to the program. There are only 2 or 3 coaches that would make the program better and they're certainly not going to put their careers at risk to be the head ball coach for the LVs.
Click to expand...
If you're okay with UT pulling off a couple of big wins a year and consistently losing to much less talented teams, then she's your girl. As for me and the Lady Vols history and tradition, I hope for more. There is a point in time when playing below expectations for so long makes it very tough to get that culture of winning big time hard to come by.
 
#1,174
#1,174
cardvolfan said:
If you're okay with UT pulling off a couple of big wins a year and consistently losing to much less talented teams, then she's your girl. As for me and the Lady Vols history and tradition, I hope for more. There is a point in time when playing below expectations for so long makes it very tough to get that culture of winning big time hard to come by.
Click to expand...

I'm good with a 75% winning percentage, multiple SEC championships, and consistently adding high level recruits. 75% is better than every UT men's coach in my lifetime.

Holly is the reason they're a talented team. Current targets probably never saw Pat coach other than finding it on YouTube.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aWhiteLoftonChism
#1,175
#1,175
Thunder Good-Oil said:
I'm good with a 75% winning percentage, multiple SEC championships, and consistently adding high level recruits. 75% is better than every UT men's coach in my lifetime.

Holly is the reason they're a talented team. Current targets probably never saw Pat coach other than finding it on YouTube.
Click to expand...
Then enjoy the season!
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top