I was fine with this logic until we got serious and decide to commit serious money (and White is also going to commit resources now as well) a couple years ago. This whole never win in the postseason, 20-22 wins a year type seasons aren’t acceptable when you’re a top 5 paid coach.
Tennessee had no chance against Villanova's 'attitude'
The Wildcats do not have any obvious NBA players. Plenty of guys could become NBA players: Samuels, Gillespie, Justin Moore. But no one jumps off the floor as an obvious draft pick/longtime NBA stud. The college basketball handbook will tell you that to win big in the sport — like national championship big — you have to have at least one or two pro guys. But if you play like Villanova did against Tennessee, like you’re on a schoolyard fighting for your lunch money, it is an awfully good equalizer. “Those guys have some dudes,” an NBA scout said, nodding toward the Tennessee bench at halftime, when the Vols trailed by 20 and had 15 points. “And they look like a middle school team right now.”
Ouch
That's fine and understandable. I hope for great seasons, but as someone whose introduction to Tennessee basketball was Buzz ball, I just can't bring myself to expect much beyond what I stated.
I see we have come back to earth. Barnes teams will always be good but never great. Hopefully we find a way to bounce back.
Like idk why Vol fans don’t understand the one time we sucked at basketball for a decent amount of time was when Dickey was in charge. Other than, we are a good program.
Tennessee had no chance against Villanova's 'attitude'
The Wildcats do not have any obvious NBA players. Plenty of guys could become NBA players: Samuels, Gillespie, Justin Moore. But no one jumps off the floor as an obvious draft pick/longtime NBA stud. The college basketball handbook will tell you that to win big in the sport — like national championship big — you have to have at least one or two pro guys. But if you play like Villanova did against Tennessee, like you’re on a schoolyard fighting for your lunch money, it is an awfully good equalizer. “Those guys have some dudes,” an NBA scout said, nodding toward the Tennessee bench at halftime, when the Vols trailed by 20 and had 15 points. “And they look like a middle school team right now.”
Ouch
Depends on how you define a good program. If your definition is that we have been consistently good year after year (at least for the most part), then I have to disagree.
This isn't a bad program by any means, but we've been pretty hit or miss for several years now if we look at our last seven coaches. The O'Neil years were awful. Green years were good. Buzz years were awful. Pearl's run was excellent. Cuonzo wasn't terrible but not all that good either aside from sneaking into the tournament once and making a nice run.
The Tyndall year wasn't good. Barnes inherited a rough situation and struggled in his first two seasons because of it but has since been solid with a couple of really nice years that sadly ended in disappointing Tournament losses.
All of that to say, we've been good in stretches. Can't so much more than that, though, in my opinion.
The Green years were only good on paper. That guy was an incompetent, underachieving clown of a coach. Imagine what Bruce Pearl would have done with Jerry’s roster.
KO wasn’t awful (the years weren’t at all memorable though). KO reporting to Doug Dickey was toxic. Inheriting a program that went 5-22 after ending the previous year with a 101-40 beat down is as hot as dumpster fires come.
Yeah, I should have clarified on the Green years. Looking back, he arguably had the best rosters this program has ever had. Give his teams to Pearl and there is at least one Final Four there imo.