bleedorange0037
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2007
- Messages
- 15,043
- Likes
- 1,643
IIRC, isn’t this idea from the Soccernomics book?@n_huffhines What was that rubric you were talking about once that had 3 criteria for national team soccer dominance? Wasn't it wealth, population, and soccer history/tradition?
If that's what it was, the US only lacks that last one. How long does it take to build history? When would you say the US truly started building towards a history? It seems like it has been all fits and starts since 1990.
A lot of it holds true for most of the world, but IMO the US exists outside of this to some extent. Wealth only helps if you put that money to good use by way of investing in good facilities, coaching and other things that maximize player development. We’ve gotten better at that in the past ten years or so, but still have miles to go to get on par with the rest of the world.
Population is a tricky one too. Sure we have the sheer numbers, but unlike the majority of the globe, the cream of our athletic talent generally doesn’t end up playing soccer. When you’re basically taking the leftovers who for whatever reason couldn’t make it in football, basketball or baseball it’s difficult to truly realize the potential of that massive population, and also makes getting the player development part even more crucial.
As for history, considering that we’ve won exactly ONE game in the knockout stage of the WC in the entire history of the MNT, there’s a decent argument to be made that we have yet to even start, at least on a global level.