marcusluvsvols
Blue collar skoller
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
- Messages
- 13,467
- Likes
- 22,961
Have to really think about this bud. Its a complicated issue.We only have 3 options to address what you're talking about.
1. Morality or personal responsibility to "just say no" or not allow the use to become a destructive addiction.
2. Change the way we address addiction
3. Make the punishment so severe and so quick people are scared to use drugs.
...or some combo of the above.
Which would you pursue?
4. remove safety nets. test positive for drugs or alcohol or nicotine and you don't get any welfare, healthcare, housing, etc. you have to be tested each month before the government cuts you a check.
I am all for this. Minus the nicotine part ... and alcohol as long as we are gonna continue to pretend that it isnt also a highly destructive drug and it remains legal to use. I dont think you can take away legal substances available OTC like alcohol and nicotine from someone just bc they get food stamps etc as long as they pay for those things with their own income and they can regularly show up for appointments sober.
That said...I think it should be MUCH harder to get assistance past temporary unemployment which is paid into. To get food stamps or welfare should be MUCH more difficult. It should also be temporary with strictly enforced end dates and miniscule assistance. I am also absolutely appalled at all the junk food, microwave junk food, filet mignon etc that are currently "EBT eligible " as well as the fact that people can use that EBT at gas stations to buy a $5 frozen food item for $10 of taxpayer funds just because the people are too lazy to actually go to the grocery store like responsible humans...like THEY would do if it was THEIR cash paying for that crap. Illegal aliens should not be eligible for ANY benefits whatsoever at any point in time. Including medical care. This would greatly discourage them from invading our country. Also...IF the government is gonna continue to provide subsidized or free housing at taxpayer expense, that housing should be closely monitored and EVERYONE who stays at any subsidized residence should be counted for income in the calculations for assistance. The drug dealer or thief boyfriends included. No more incentives for NOT getting married for the poor. That policy especially has destroyed poor black and white folks by removing Dads from homes. It also encourages some irresponsible birth control practices due to increased handouts from more kids. No expectations of privacy in subsidized housing either. Regular and unscheduled inspections. If drug activity is detected in a unit and can be proven, then the tenants are evicted and no longer eligible for govt housing. That would put an end to the drug infested shooting galleries that housing projects always become. Caught with drugs in a unit= eviction 1st offense.