mr.checkerboards
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 58,964
- Likes
- 99,137
Yeah, now the answer is the NFC South, but in the past 2-3 years it was widely regarded to be the AFC South. Everyone beat everyone in the division, but then outside of it the division was getting smoked by most of the teams it played.I know. They're both terrible. I think Carolina being so bad is a nose for the NFC. The Texans probably have a better shot of winning a game in the playoffs. Jacksonville folded up like a cheap tent since SF went in there and beat their assrs
Well, yes, the Bucks winning the Superbowl and NO being really good till Brees retiredYeah, now the answer is the NFC South, but in the past 2-3 years it was widely regarded to be the AFC South. Everyone beat everyone in the division, but then outside of it the division was getting smoked by most of the teams it played.
From twitter reports I've seen, so take it with a grain of salt....... Vrabel is upset because he wanted J Rob's assistant GM to get the GM job, so now he wants someone over Rans head because he doesn't like the analytical stuff that's been brought in.That’s dumb, if true. He’s just poking the bear with that sort of thinking.
I think Vrabel has a little too big of an ego for a couple decent seasons of worth of production. If NE offered a 3rd I'd take it in a heart beat. Seems like he's trying to undermine Ran already. Bye.Don’t most organizations have a President or VP of football operations that’s over the GM and coach?
The question of "what is the value of a high end coach in terms of draft capital" is an interesting one. I would never give the Sean Payton level 1st and a 3rd for any coach. But I think I'd happily take a 3rd or better for most any coach.
Surely there are some exceptions? I can't look at the track record of guys like Belichick, Reid, Harbaugh, Tomlin, Belichick, McVey, Shanahan, Pederson, Carroll, etc. and think those teams would have been better off swapping their coach for an extra third rounder.