I hear you. Bit different in the SEC when we’re one of only three schools (us, Mizzou, TX A&M) that doesn’t have at least one natty in one of the 3 major sports in the last 15 years. Compound that with the fact that we’ve been pretty awful across all 3 except for the last 5 years.I think most schools would be happy with that, because most schools, and I mean that literally, don't have either.
Gotcha. Well our lineup is pretty inconsistent as we’ve seen all season. Adding the best pitcher to the mix isn’t really a recipe for success. If we lose this, get past Stanford and face LSU again, it will be much more competitive.Just saying he’s not so good that we shouldn’t be competitive. We have a good team too. That’s what I was trying to say