bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 74,148
- Likes
- 50,420
Keep telling yourself that.
You don't see a change of fg% by 40% simply on fatigue, our defense was much better in the second half.
Yea my biggest complaint as many have mentioned, substitutions. Did Q or AJ see minutes in the second half?
I would actually like to see a minute breakdown in the second half, we played our studs and it showed. In both games this year we've gone deep bench early and it's resulted in bad first half play, trim the rotation now IMO.
There was a shot inside of 5min to go from 8-10ft that stokes didn't even bother raising his arms to contest. There big guy was so worn down he had no chance at making it. It was appalling bad post defense which stokes is making a habit of
Yea my biggest complaint as many have mentioned, substitutions. Did Q or AJ see minutes in the second half?
I would actually like to see a minute breakdown in the second half, we played our studs and it showed. In both games this year we've gone deep bench early and it's resulted in bad first half play, trim the rotation now IMO.
So 1 shot is proof of this? Ok
Like I said you don't see a difference in fg% of 40% without a change in defense.
Martin just talked about it post game things they did differently in the second half.
What did he say?
I am sure part of the succes was as you say. Other part was just law of averages and the other was being worn down. All 3 reasons especially considering how big of a difference
I don't mind that win at all. Been saying for several years there are more good basketball players on lesser teams. That's why I love the sport. If you can dribble, shoot and know spacing with some picks, you can play with anyone, especially when you can't miss. There continue to be more and more lesser known teams with good ball coaches and players.
Better than an L for sure.