The Problems with Trans-ideology

not naturally....no. there is subset of society that chooses that life...but its not natural.....still believe in the gay gene huh
So there is no 100% hetero like you claimed? Got it

I've heard from enough homosexuals to believe it's absolutely not a choice for most. How that's controlled by the body is outside my purview but those who experience it likely know best
 
So there is no 100% hetero like you claimed? Got it

I've heard from enough homosexuals to believe it's absolutely not a choice for most. How that's controlled by the body is outside my purview but those who experience it likely know best
Again all societies are inherently hetero or they wouldn't exist....its really not that tough a concept....
 
So there is no 100% hetero like you claimed? Got it

I've heard from enough homosexuals to believe it's absolutely not a choice for most. How that's controlled by the body is outside my purview but those who experience it likely know best
giphy.gif
 
The problem is you claimed all societies in existence are 100%, not inherently
Society wouldnt exist if they weren't hetero....if homosexuality was capable of procreation then you could argue that its possible for a society to "be" (naturally) homosexual.....as that is not possible society is inherently heterosexual due to the ability to procreate and continue the spieces...that's why a gay gene has not been discovered...why there is no difference in genetic structures between a homo or hetero person..its a choice. And a destructive one at that.
 
Society wouldnt exist if they weren't hetero....if homosexuality was capable of procreation then you could argue that its possible for a society to "be" (naturally) homosexual.....as that is not possible society is inherently heterosexual due to the ability to procreate and continue the spieces...that's why a gay gene has not been discovered...why there is no difference in genetic structures between a homo or hetero person..its a choice. And a destructive one at that.
Homosexuals can and do procreate. They do it in the exact same manner many hetero couples do

The simple fact is people like you need it to be a choice so you can declare it yucky destructive. Many of the people actually experiencing it would disagree with your scientific assessment
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
It was a question and an opinion based on the current trend of adding other groups to those letters, not a "conspiracy theory". If you think the Vols are going to go 16-0 win a natty, is that conspiracy or opinion? Take a smoke break, bro.

Would you prefer "crackpot take" or "slippery slope ********?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
Society wouldnt exist if they weren't hetero....if homosexuality was capable of procreation then you could argue that its possible for a society to "be" (naturally) homosexual.....as that is not possible society is inherently heterosexual due to the ability to procreate and continue the spieces...that's why a gay gene has not been discovered...why there is no difference in genetic structures between a homo or hetero person..its a choice. And a destructive one at that.

OK, boomer.
 
Yeah, I don't they do. Did you not have anatomy in High School? Parents not teach you the birds and bees?
Even better, when my wife and I were trying to have kids we had some issues and learned a lot. The people we learned from were actual doctors so I believe they have surpassed your HS education. Technology has really come a long way from the turkey baster
 
Even better, when my wife and I were trying to have kids we had some issues and learned a lot. The people we learned from were actual doctors so I believe they have surpassed your HS education. Technology has really come a long way from the turkey baster

Ahh, I see, you said the exact same way MANY hetero couples do. Now you are talking about a very small minority of hetero couples who have conception issues. But, I assume, you didnt have conception issues because you were putting it in the wrong hole, right?
 
Ahh, I see, you said the exact same way MANY hetero couples do. Now you are talking about a very small minority of hetero couples who have conception issues. But, I assume, you didnt have conception issues because you were putting it in the wrong hole, right?
The reason why is irrelevant since the crux of the argument I was quoting was around the ability to procreate. He claimed it wasn't possible as did you by using your HS science class as proof.
 
YES !!!!!






An amendment to the legislation provides a list of flags that are permitted in schools.

If made law, LEAs and public charter schools would be allowed to fly only the following:

• The United States Flag

• The Official Tennessee State Flag

• A Flag That Cannot be Disturbed or Altered (TCA Section 4-1-412)

• The POW/MIA Flag

• A Flag Representing an Indian Tribe (25 U.S.C. Section 5304)

• A Flag Representing a City, County, Metropolitan Government, or Other Political Subdivision of the State of Tennessee

• A Flag Representing a Unit, Brand, or Other Division of the Armed Forces Including ROTC Programs

• A Flag Representing a College or University

• A Flag Displayed Temporarily as Part of a Bona Fide Course Curriculum

• An Official School Flag

 
Last edited:
The reason why is irrelevant since the crux of the argument I was quoting was around the ability to procreate. He claimed it wasn't possible as did you by using your HS science class as proof.

It isnt possible for 2 men or 2 women to procreate.
 
Can a man and a woman procreate without having intercourse?

Would a society full of men and women simply die out in a generation if all were homosexual?

They can today.

A society full of gays would die out very quickly, yes. Within a few generations, of course assuming all offspring are gay too.

The big difference here is, a man and woman getting help to conceive is within the bounds of nature. 2 gays using a surrogate womb or surrogate sperm, is unnatural. They are trying to unnaturally mimic that which is natural.

I dont even know if society should allow gays to have children either by surrogacy or adoption.
 
Good, let's get is passed.


While I understand the sentiment, all this will do is help push kids into normalizing this mess over the long run. Banning crap like this does not work with kids and we all know it.

A drinking age of 18 was better than no beer at all when I was 17.
 
While I understand the sentiment, all this will do is help push kids into normalizing this mess over the long run. Banning crap like this does not work with kids and we all know it.

A drinking age of 18 was better than no beer at all when I was 17.

It's just another stupid waste of time and taxpayer money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland

VN Store



Back
Top