The Problems with Trans-ideology

[NashVol11]

What is gaslighting, Alex.

I agree, people keep trying to gaslight the public into believing that's some mainstream movement. It's conspiracy weirdos' favorite boogeyman

 

[Vol8188]

I agree, people keep trying to gaslight the public into believing that's some mainstream movement. It's conspiracy weirdos' favorite boogeyman

Keep on trolling. I’m sure the term isn’t being brought up because a democrat in congress used it recently. Was probably created by right wing academics too

 

[NashVol11]

Like, search "minor attracted person" on Twitter and let me know how many posts are people "normalizing pedophilia" or whatever and how many are right wingers fear-mongering about it. I bet it's nearly 100% the latter.

Actually just checked myself and I was right

 

[Vol8188]

Like, search "minor attracted person" on Twitter and let me know how many posts are people "normalizing pedophilia" or whatever and how many are right wingers fear-mongering about it. I bet it's nearly 100% the latter.

Actually just checked myself and I was rightView attachment 632435
View attachment 632437View attachment 632438

Dumb trolling is dumb. Any negative event will always have less participants in the action itself than there are people calling out the action.

What I do find weird is that you seem to have a problem with people calling out the action.

 

[NashVol11]

Dumb trolling is dumb. Any negative event will always have less participants in the action itself than there are people calling out the action.

What I do find weird is that you seem to have a problem with people calling out the action.

Hilariously made up and Exhibit #3098234 of you being unable to have an honest conversation. I said exactly what I meant, which is that people fear-monger about it far more than it actually happens because it's a boogeyman.

The "Democrat saying it in Congress" appears deliberately misconstrued and I didn't hear her say that actual term anyway. The LGBT pedophile thing is a conspiracy theory no matter how easily idiots like you fall for it

 

[Vol8188]

Hilariously made up and Exhibit #3098234 of you being unable to have an honest conversation. I said exactly what I meant, which is that people fear-monger about it far more than it actually happens because it's a boogeyman.

The "Congressman saying it in Congress" appears deliberately misconstrued and I didn't hear her say that actual term anyway. The LGBT pedophile thing is a conspiracy theory no matter how easily idiots like you fall for it

Say you were aware of the democrat in congress saying it? Meaning the entire conversation started with you openly lying….but I’m the one being dishonest?

Troll on…poorly

 

[NashVol11]

Say you were aware of the democrat in congress saying it? Meaning the entire conversation started with you openly lying….but I’m the one being dishonest?

Troll on…poorly

I just looked it up and linked what I found you clown, how many more hundreds of times are you going to lie about others looking for a "gotcha" only to be as completely wrong as possible

 

[Vol8188]

I just looked it up and linked what I found you clown, how many more hundreds of times are you going to lie about others looking for a "gotcha" only to be as completely wrong as possible

Must not be as many on the right talking about it as you claim, if you were still ignorant of this until the last 10 minutes.

Or maybe there has been a ton of people talking about it and you were too sorry to ask the simple question of “why”?

Either way, I’m glad you’re enlighten now. It’s the least we can do

 

[NashVol11]

Must not be as many on the right talking about it as you claim, if you were still ignorant of this until the last 10 minutes.

Or maybe there has been a ton of people talking about it and you were too sorry to ask the simple question of “why”?

Either way, I’m glad you’re enlighten now. It’s the least we can do

She was quoting the weirdos on the right who keep saying that, which was my point. You're welcome for holding your hand through an article you apparently couldn't understand, after falling for a debunked narrative about "a Democrat senator saying it in Congress" just like the people I'm talking about

 

[Vol8188]

The LGBT pedophile thing is a conspiracy theory no matter how easily idiots like you fall for it

Im sure it’s coincidental that it was a non-binary person who coined the term MAP. Even though if this were truly disassociated from the alphabet people, the odds of this coming specifically from a non binary person would be astronomically low

 

[Vol8188]

She was quoting the weirdos on the right who keep saying that, which was my point. You're welcome for holding your hand through an article you apparently couldn't understand, after falling for a debunked narrative about "a Democrat senator saying it in Congress" just like the people I'm talking about

lol I’m sure non-binary person who coined the term is completely coincidental and in no way a left wing person

 

[NashVol11]

Im sure it’s coincidental that it was a non-binary person who coined the term MAP. Even though if this were truly disassociated from the alphabet people, the odds of this coming specifically from a non binary person would be astronomically low

lol I’m sure non-binary person who coined the term is completely coincidental and in no way a left wing person

Disproving the universally accepted idea that this is a conspiracy theory by doing the "wHaT a CoInCiDeNcE" thing that every single conspiracy idiot does lol

 

[hndog609]

I agree that biological males shouldn't compete in women's sports. My point is that it isn't anywhere near prevalent enough to be anything more than a mole hill right now. It has the potential to destroy women's sports if it became really common, but it's a rarity right now. With 0.6% of the US population identifying as transgender...it's probably always going to be a rarity. Clay Travis, and many others, try to make it into some massive five alarm fire of an issue because it plays really well for them politically.

Why is prevalence a criteria? The number of males competing against females in demarcated sports should be zero. Make that the rule and be done with it.

 

[Vol8188]

Disproving the universally accepted idea that this is a conspiracy theory by doing the "wHaT a CoInCiDeNcE" thing that every single conspiracy idiot does lol

So the term MAPs comes from a non binary person, but that is just coincidence and this is in no way associated with that movement despite almost no one in the world being non-binary?

Weird

 

[Vol8188]

Like, search "minor attracted person" on Twitter and let me know how many posts are people "normalizing pedophilia" or whatever and how many are right wingers fear-mongering about it. I bet it's nearly 100% the latter.

Actually just checked myself and I was rightView attachment 632435
View attachment 632437View attachment 632438

Why does people pushing back against this upset you so much?

I’m not sure anything ever has the exact right amount of pushback from the other side. So why care if this one thing gets more pushback than you think it should?

Unless of course you support the destigmatization of pedophiles (the stated reason the author created the phrase) and are therefore upset it’s receiving pushback

 

[NashVol11]

So the term MAPs comes from a non binary person, but that is just coincidence and this is in no way associated with that movement despite almost no one in the world being non-binary?

Weird

Most conspiracy theories are based on a lot more than "one non-binary person wrote about MAPs so therefore LGBT is cover for pedophilia" but you didn't think that far

 

[NashVol11]

Why does people pushing back against this upset you so much?

I’m not sure anything ever has the exact right amount of pushback from the other side. So why care if this one thing gets more pushback than you think it should?

Unless of course you support the destigmatization of pedophiles (the stated reason the author created the phrase) and are therefore upset it’s receiving pushback

It doesn't upset me, you made that up. "Pushing back" is a dishonest description (shocking) because it's not being pushed at them at all

 

[Vol8188]

Most conspiracy theories are based on a lot more than "one non-binary person wrote about MAPs so therefore LGBT is cover for pedophilia" but you didn't think that far

Wrote about maps or coined the actual term? At least try to be honest.

lol but yeah, it’s just coincidence.

 

[Vol8188]

It doesn't upset me, you made that up. "Pushing back" is an inaccurate description because it's not being pushed at them at all

Obviously there was a push by at a minimum one academic to do this. You’re openly lying again

 

[NashVol11]

Wrote about maps or coined the actual term? At least try to be honest.

lol but yeah, it’s just coincidence.

The term that no one uses but right wingers as a boogeyman? You are proving my point lol, sorry you fell for such a dumb theory

 

[NashVol11]

Obviously there was a push by at a minimum one academic to do this. You’re openly lying again

ONE person?!?!?! We're all under attack. The KKK or neo-Nazi groups have far more than one person in them and using them to characterize all white people or all straight people would still be stupid

 

[Vol8188]

The term that no one uses but right wingers as a boogeyman? You are proving my point lol, sorry you fell for such a dumb theory

I can find about ten different academic papers in the last 3 years that use the term.

When someone in academics first coins a term (2021 for this one) it typically takes awhile before the term catches on.

Why though do you think this is receiving such disproportionate outrage? The reason should be obvious

 

[Vol8188]

ONE person?!?!?! We're all under attack. The KKK or neo-Nazi groups have far more than one person in them and using them to characterize all white people or all straight people would still be stupid

lol troll on….one day maybe you’ll be good at it

 

[NashVol11]

I can find about ten different academic papers in the last 3 years that use the term.

When someone in academics first coins a term (2021 for this one) it typically takes awhile before the term catches on.

Why though do you think this is receiving such disproportionate outrage? The reason should be obvious

Because people love to characterize every minority group they don't like as "coming for your children"

 

[Vol8188]

Because people love to characterize every minority group they don't like as "coming for your children"

Lmfao. I’m sure it has nothing to do with the topic here being an actual minority group that is sexually attracted to your children.

I hope one day you grow up and actually have a family. It would do you and millions of other liberals a lot of good