The Problems with Trans-ideology

#7,602
#7,602
gcbvol said:
I hear you, and agree the behavior you've experienced is wrong and unacceptable (assuming one doesn't instigate). I don't mean to diminish your experience, but I've lived through threats of violence and death and know many who have been beaten for being LGBT. Thankfully, not so much these days, and I'd like to stay on this trend. But, we keep trying to slide back.

Hell, there are evangelical preachers today calling for the stoning/imprisonment/death of LGBT people to the applause and amens of their congregations. I am, unfortunately, intimately familiar with faith-based hate. And we've seen Nancy Mace railing about trans people and bathrooms for days, saying it's about protecting biological women. But she's totally good with a sexual predator colleague being nominated for AG. She's a fraudulent grandstander, and its disgusting she's making life hell for a new member of Congress who has done nothing wrong. All for political capital.
Click to expand...
The fringe is always the most vocal.

I've had some limited positive exposure to the gay community. A family member and before that a friend from high school who was close to a few of the females in our friend group. I could always tell he struggled to fit in, and was uncomfortable around some of the guys.......we finally just told him we knew and didn't really care. That seemed to help him get more at ease.

Say all that to say this, I'm sure life can't be easy for LGBTQ people. He'll it's not easy for straight people..... Point is I think we all really want the same things in life. As someone pointed out earlier trans people have shared bathrooms with us for years and we never knew.....I think that's probably best, why should we know? Unless they were creeps it wouldn't raise alarms for people. The only problem is there is a portion of that community that is a stain on the whole, same for any subgroup of people. And children are often the target of creeps, straight or LGBTQ.

The question is how do we handle it? As a father I couldn't accompany my daughter into a women's bathroom. I never felt comfortable taking her into a men's bathroom.

Common sense needs to be used, I think you are right that political points and clout get in the way on both sides of this issue.

JMO
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: gcbvol
#7,603
#7,603
just bob said:
I'm glad you came back. I have a serious question for you. I noticed you use LGBT several times in this thread. Why are you alienating the rest? You're excluding queer, intersex, asexual, that 2-spirit thing, the + (And we both know what some in you group want that + to include...), and whatever else I'm missing that may have been added today. Why are you being exclusive? Thank you.
Click to expand...
You ignorant ass. No one in @gcbvol “group” advocates for accepting pedophilla. He's told you what he thinks. Those who do he doesn't accept or are part of his group. You are the perfect example of bigotry. The best part is you openly admit it. Sad part is you are too lost to see why. Poor poor jussie
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DinkinFlicka, 85SugarVol, NashVol11 and 1 other person
#7,605
#7,605
just bob said:
So when I'm seeing their safe group constantly changing names my curiosity takes me to a proud member of that group who only calls them LGBT. This leads me to believe that he's an older gent (35-50) and more of an OG who keeps it simple, or rather keeps it to what he knows best. But I don't know for sure, so I asked him why he's excluding all the new ones.

Bold - I know he can, he doesn't need your sorry butt to needlessly and pathetically defend him now does he?
Click to expand...
Sorry I missed this. Yes, I am older. I'm 54, married (31 years next month), and recently retired. So, using only LGBT or LGBTQ isn't necessarily exclusionary. In my view, the full acronym is more useful or important at an organizational level. We do work with local LGBTQ+ nonprofits, and I understand it means something for intersex, asexual, etc. to feel they belong. I always try to treat people with respect, so what I use is going to depend on setting and audience. Just because I don't always use QIA+ does not mean I do not see them as part of our community.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11 and just bob
#7,606
#7,606
gcbvol said:
Sorry I missed this. Yes, I am older. I'm 54, married (31 years next month), and recently retired. So, using only LGBT or LGBTQ isn't necessarily exclusionary. In my view, the full acronym is more useful or important at an organizational level. We do work with local LGBTQ+ nonprofits, and I understand it means something for intersex, asexual, etc. to feel they belong. I always try to treat people with respect, so what I use is going to depend on setting and audience. Just because I don't always use QIA+ does not mean I do not see them as part of our community.
Click to expand...
Thank you. My younger cousin, 30ish - yes gay and married, is all about the newest thing. Updates the fam on the community. Prides himself on being as welcoming as possible, yadda yadda, and tells us all about it at family functions. His posts on Facebook (Yes he still uses it) regarding all things he's doing LGBT related (Lives in Seattle...) includes all of the newest letters, numbers, symbols, etc. My older aunt, 55ish, not married but the same partner for like 30 years, couldn't care any less. Never even uses LGBT or talks about it. Even drives a Subaru - she knows I love that. I was genuinely curious regarding you because as you have seen I figured you were older. Not OLD, just "Older" than the younger dudes who speak differently and I wanted to know if my suspicions were correct. I am rather blunt in person and online and prefer to be so instead of beating around the bush. Sometimes that means taking things the wrong way, sometimes the right way. As you have seen I have gathered a colorful fanbase who like to jump at me when I involved myself in pretty much any thread. I love it. I'll respond to them later when I feel like it - ha.

Thanks for the response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gcbvol
#7,616
#7,616

Father Who Pleaded With Pediatrician Ex-Wife Not To 'Chemically Castrate' Their Son, 9, is dealt crushing blow​



A Texas father who tried for years to stop his ex-wife from allowing his pre-teen child, who now identifies as 'Luna,' to be chemically castrated has been dealt a blow in California court.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mark Juhas ruled that Jeff Younger's ex-wife Anne Georgulas would be granted full custody of his 12-year-old son James and would be able to allow him to transition.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Dad who pleaded not to 'chemically castrate' son dealt crushing blow

A Texas father who tried for years to stop his ex-wife from allowing his pre-teen child, who now identifies as 'Luna', to be chemically castrated has been dealt a blow in court.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
 
#7,617
#7,617
Franklin Pierce said:

Father Who Pleaded With Pediatrician Ex-Wife Not To 'Chemically Castrate' Their Son, 9, is dealt crushing blow​



A Texas father who tried for years to stop his ex-wife from allowing his pre-teen child, who now identifies as 'Luna,' to be chemically castrated has been dealt a blow in California court.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Mark Juhas ruled that Jeff Younger's ex-wife Anne Georgulas would be granted full custody of his 12-year-old son James and would be able to allow him to transition.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Dad who pleaded not to 'chemically castrate' son dealt crushing blow

A Texas father who tried for years to stop his ex-wife from allowing his pre-teen child, who now identifies as 'Luna', to be chemically castrated has been dealt a blow in court.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...
Anyone who chemically castrates a child deserves whatever awaits them in the next life.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top