The Problems with Trans-ideology
- Thread starter Vol8188
- Start date
Sgt_Nick_Fury
Danneskjöld's love child.
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2010
- Messages
- 11,874
- Likes
- 18,675
orangotango
Go Vols!!
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,692
- Likes
- 15,135
85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 32,520
- Likes
- 63,897
NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 22,888
- Likes
- 7,974
Shame is a powerful motivator. You know the best way to get your fat friend who can't get a date to lose weight? Tell them how great they look and that they're perfect the way they are. Ha, no. Shame them. There's different levels of shame.
Bringing back insane asylums and putting them there may be the most humane thing to do. Being a man or woman and telling the world they need to accept you as the opposite is delusional psychotic behavior and should not be tolerated. Do you play along with schizophrenics? Your answer to that questions is very telling. If you believe these people are of sound mind, then there may be something wrong with you too.
Last edited:
Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 46,923
- Likes
- 44,921
I think where we differ is you see all societal pressure and/or norms as a negative.
If you rewind time to when we had more societal pressure, we had greater levels of happiness, lower levels of suicide, lower levels of anxiety/depression, lower divorce rates, and less kids born to one parent homes
The left wing idea that your own sexual preferences are the most significant aspect of your being and are greater than your societal obligations hasn’t had great real world outcomes.
Last edited:
CagleMtnVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2008
- Messages
- 26,980
- Likes
- 42,170
85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 32,520
- Likes
- 63,897
I’m not big on passing judgement on the mental fitness of others. That sort of thing has a way of coming back around.
The wrong group of people “in charge” just might deem me unfit due to, say… the number of firearms I (used to) own.
Your last sentence is a testament to that - no way in hell I’d want the likes of you adjudicating my “fitness”.
I can and should judge all day with the trannies. When you're clearly a dude and spend your whole life trying to get others to alter reality and play along with your psychotic delusions - you should be called out. You can call a dude ma'am all day if you like, just know you look like a f'n idiot and should be shamed as well.
Having the wrong people in charge is terrible, we've been living through that for decades. I'd normally say I hope you lost your firearms in a boating accident, but you increasingly show on what is just a college sports message board that you're not of sound mind.
You have said on here that you're all about calling dudes ma'am if they want. You're not of sound mind and you need people like me. I am here to help, and I'm not from the government.
Now, do you play along with schizophrenics psychosis? I see you avoided this...
CobbVol
Junior Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 4,731
- Likes
- 9,767
Words of reason from across the pond ...
From the article:
Rowling was responding to a critic who said they wished she would use her “immense power for good” and labelled her “hateful focus” on transgender children as “hurtful and unnecessary”.
In response, the 59-year-old writer posted on X, and said: “There are no trans kids. No child is ‘born in the wrong body’.
“There are only adults like you, prepared to sacrifice the health of minors to bolster your belief in an ideology that will end up wreaking more harm than lobotomies and false memory syndrome combined.”
“Schools affirm kids’ trans identities behind parents’ backs,” she went on. “Many parents are struggling to protect kids from a Zeitgeist telling them that anxieties about puberty, sexuality and growing up can be fixed by lifelong reliance on Big Pharma and by doctors who make Frankenstein look ethical.”
www.telegraph.co.uk
From the article:
Rowling was responding to a critic who said they wished she would use her “immense power for good” and labelled her “hateful focus” on transgender children as “hurtful and unnecessary”.
In response, the 59-year-old writer posted on X, and said: “There are no trans kids. No child is ‘born in the wrong body’.
“There are only adults like you, prepared to sacrifice the health of minors to bolster your belief in an ideology that will end up wreaking more harm than lobotomies and false memory syndrome combined.”
“Schools affirm kids’ trans identities behind parents’ backs,” she went on. “Many parents are struggling to protect kids from a Zeitgeist telling them that anxieties about puberty, sexuality and growing up can be fixed by lifelong reliance on Big Pharma and by doctors who make Frankenstein look ethical.”
JK Rowling says ‘no child is born in the wrong body’
Harry Potter author insists there are ‘no trans kids’ but only adults believing in an ideology which will ‘wreak more harm than lobotomies’
www.telegraph.co.uk
82_VOL_83
Nickelback rocks!
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 52,554
- Likes
- 45,139
hjeagle1vol
TOP GUN TENNESSEE DTBmc
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2012
- Messages
- 8,830
- Likes
- 33,075
W.TN.Orange Blood
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2012
- Messages
- 128,022
- Likes
- 329,696
hjeagle1vol
TOP GUN TENNESSEE DTBmc
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2012
- Messages
- 8,830
- Likes
- 33,075
CobbVol
Junior Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 4,731
- Likes
- 9,767
The next generation needs to be properly indoctrinated ...
From the article:
The law, SB 407, was enacted in 2023 and sponsored by California State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) with this exact purpose in mind: to weed out Christian families from the foster system because he depicted them, without offering any specific evidence, as predators who would abuse gay and transgender kids under his care.
The November 14 letter, sent to county and state-licensed foster care agencies, said that “Each resource family must have the capacity, ability, and willingness to safeguard a child’s or non-minor dependent’s personal rights and respect and honor the child’s identities regardless of their own values and beliefs.”
And that a failure to affirm the identity constitutes “a risk” to the child’s “health or safety” which would require denial of foster care applications or cancellation of existing licenses.
From the article:
The law, SB 407, was enacted in 2023 and sponsored by California State Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) with this exact purpose in mind: to weed out Christian families from the foster system because he depicted them, without offering any specific evidence, as predators who would abuse gay and transgender kids under his care.
The November 14 letter, sent to county and state-licensed foster care agencies, said that “Each resource family must have the capacity, ability, and willingness to safeguard a child’s or non-minor dependent’s personal rights and respect and honor the child’s identities regardless of their own values and beliefs.”
And that a failure to affirm the identity constitutes “a risk” to the child’s “health or safety” which would require denial of foster care applications or cancellation of existing licenses.
There should be no problem, whether 10 or 10K. And if the activists are allowed to normalize aberration, it will exponentially increase.
Men who insist on competing with women are simply abusive males who've found government-sanctioned outlets in school, olympic, prisons, and other organized arenas. They hold women in contempt, the same as an adult insisting on competing with children would. There's an inherent physiological reason trans 'athletes' are nearly exclusively biological males. Purposely positioning yourself to abuse inately weaker persons and asserting it your right, is depraved. I think too many well-meaning but stupid people overlook or aren't aware, that biological men masquerading as women are not void of sexual attraction to women for the most part. Which is why common sense told us for milennia that areas of societal privacy for men and women are a good, sensible thing.
Nothing about men abusing women for sport withstands logical, ethical, or moral scrutiny.
And recruiting children to the ideology, insisting they have the maturity to chemically and surgically alter their bodies and assume the attendant psychological and physiological problems associated, is simply and purely evil. The 'live daughter or dead son' dichotomy is a false, vile propaganda tool used to disarm otherwise decent parents to allow recruitment. By people who care nothing about the well-being of the child or the fact they - given sanctuary against prevalent psychological recruitment and time to experience puberty and growth of mental maturity - will outgrow childhood insecurities those people prey upon.
Say 'yes' to adults to live as they wish, but a firm 'no' to their movement.
Last edited:
VOLLeeann
Real Men Are VOLS!!
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2024
- Messages
- 1,112
- Likes
- 1,205
VOLLeeann
Real Men Are VOLS!!
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2024
- Messages
- 1,112
- Likes
- 1,205
No, I'm just an average (the opposite of aberration) person, whom the Source created as male and imbued millennia of people the soundness to understand biological differences, regardless of psychological aberration.
So I expressed hate, even as I advocated for the minority being allowed to live their - THEIR - adult lives as they wish - ?
The shorter answer was "Yes, I do not understand use of the term and the rest of it went right over my head as well".
Last edited:
VN Store
